个体电脑游戏版豁达治疗对中晚期肺癌作用的研究
[Abstract]:Background: the mortality of lung cancer is high. It is one of the most malignant tumors in the malignant tumor. Because of its insidious incidence and no obvious symptoms in the early stage, most patients are diagnosed as middle and late lung cancer. After being diagnosed as lung cancer, most patients have anxiety, depression, negative emotions, combined with treatment. The strong adverse reaction and unbearable cancer pain will make the despair and pessimistic mood more serious. This bad psychological vicious circle makes the lung cancer clinical routine treatment more difficult, so how to reduce the negative emotion, improve the mental state, assist the clinical treatment and improve the quality of life of the patients with middle and late lung cancer. Objective: To study and make an improved version of the individual computer game version of the open-minded therapy, to explore the effect of the individual computer game on the clinical efficacy of the patients with middle and advanced lung cancer in the psychological, physiological and social aspects, and to provide a theoretical and empirical basis for the promotion of Shen Xinkang in the middle and late stage lung cancer patients. Method: 1, Make the improved version of Individual Computer Game-version Magnanimous Therapy (ICGMT), select 8 small stories that are lively and interesting, close to life, and be rich in philosophy, and edit them into Flash animated forms; with the development of the plot, they will be interspersed with the question of "positive" and "negative"; each time To make different choices, the story will develop in different directions and finally get different results. After each video game, the system will automatically score.2. 60 cases of advanced lung cancer patients are divided into group ICGMT and control group, each of which is divided into group ICGMT and control group.ICGMT except routine treatment, and one to one on the computer. The individual computer game edition was treated for 2 weeks, 4 times a week, and one time for about 40 minutes. The control group only used the tumor clinical routine treatment and no open-minded treatment. The two groups were treated with the cancer psychosomatic state questionnaire, the T mental scale, the cancer patient psychological adjustment scale, the cancer coping questionnaire, the enterprising and open-minded questionnaire, the cancer patient's life. The function index scale, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale and the subconscious painting room - tree - man test were used as the patients' psychological and social indicators. All the participants recorded brain wave, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory value by biofeedback therapy instrument before and after two weeks, and collected venous blood to examine immuno cell Ig A, Ig G, Ig M, NK value as the evaluation of physiological indexes of patients. The two groups were compared before and after the experiment, such as psychosomatic condition, psychological response, adjustment mode, quality of life and physiological indexes, and so on to evaluate the effect. Results: 1. developed a modified version of the individual computer game version of open-minded therapy (ICGMT).2. patients' psychological, social indicators (1) cancer psychosomatic state questionnaire score: group ICGMT intervention 2 weeks later. The total score, "psychological" dimension, "body" dimension, "social function" dimension, "psychological behavior plasticity" score (30.70 + 3.98,8.10 + 1.63,7.20 + 1.21,8.2 + 1.45,7.00 + 1.01) were lower than admission (35.90 + 4.91,10.03 + 2.11,8.60 + 1.75,9.2 + 1.87,8.07 + 1.33), and the difference was statistically significant (P0.01), and the total score of the control group after 2 weeks, " The score of "psychological", "body" and "social function" (40.08 + 1.11,11.94 + 4.38,10.22 + 2.13,14.01 + 3.78) were higher than that of admission (35.33 + 1.37,10.83 + 4.28,7.71 + 2.41,9.89 + 4.23), and the difference was significant (P0.01), but there was no statistical difference between the "psychological behavior plasticity" dimension score (9.01 + 3.54) and admission (8.78 + 1.09). Learning significance (P0.05). (2) T mental scale score: ICGMT group and control group in the total average, "personality", "cognitive habit", "emotional expression" and "subconscious", compared to the admission, the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). (3) the psychological adjustment scale score of the cancer patients: the total average score of the ICGMT group, "emotion / self-esteem" "Subjective feeling", "interpersonal relationship / social life", "daily life" and "other" five dimensions (3.40 + 0.33,3.65 + 0.54,3.53 + 0.41,3.53 + 0.34,2.89 + 0.45,3.37 + 0.59) were higher than admission (3.35 + 0.52,3.57 + 0.43,3.41 + 0.51,2.77 + 0.48,3.51 + 0.33,3.29 + 0.51), the difference was significant (P0.01); the control group was 2 weeks after the total. The five dimensions of "emotion / self-esteem", "subjective feeling", "interpersonal relationship / social life", "daily life" and "other" (3.29 + 0.49,3.72 + 0.74,3.38 + 0.64,2.69 + 0.21,3.87 + 0.24,3.45 + 0.81) were all decreased with admission (3.31 + 0.64,3.73 + 1.49,3.39 + 0.52,2.71 + 0.42,3.89 + 0.32,3.47 + 0.49), but the difference was not statistically significant Learning significance (P0.05). (4) cancer Coping Questionnaire score: the total average score of the ICGMT group, the "face" dimension (2.34 + 0.14,2.77 + 0.55) was higher than that of admission (2.29 + 0.23,2.48 + 0.52), "avoidance and depression" and "yield" dimension (1.73 + 0.69,2.10 + 0.55) were lower than that of admission (2 + 0.51,1.73 + 0.69), and the difference was significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the dimension (2.05 + 1.46,1.56 + 5.67) and the admission (2.04 + 0.61,1.55 + 0.41), and the control group was lower than the admission (2.41 + 0.39) after 2 weeks (2.56 + 0.41), and the difference was significant (P0.05). The total equalization, "avoidance and depression", "yield", "fantasy", and "vent" four were significant. The dimension (2.01 + 1.45,2.14 + 0.29,2.43 + 0.58,2.12 + 0.11,1.42 + 0.56) had no significant difference compared with the admission (1.99 + 1.08,2.13 + 0.63,2.46 + 0.22,1.43 + 0.58). (5) the enterprising and open-minded questionnaire score: the total score of the ICGMT group and the positive enterprising dimension (72.35 + 4.09) was higher than that of the admission (70.5). 6 + 7.89,35.45 + 4.54), the difference was significant (P0.05), but there was no significant difference between the "open-minded tolerance" dimension (36.27 + 3.55) and the intervention (36.01 + 4.06) before the intervention (P0.05), and the total score of the control group after 2 weeks (70.81 + 6.21,35.20 + 1.89) and the admission (71.11 + 8.30,35.09 + 1.21) had no statistical significance (p0.0 5); the dimension of "aggressive" (30.07 + 1.89) was lower than that of 2 weeks (34.11 + 2.11), and the difference was significant (P0.05). (6) the scale score of the life function index of cancer patients: the total average score of the ICGMT group, the "good body" dimension, the "good psychological" dimension, and the "social good" dimension (4.38 + 1.21,4.63 + 0.37,5.80 + 1.24) were higher than that of the entry. In hospital (4.13 + 0.67,4.34 + 1.31,4.86 + 0.88,5.67 + 1.15), the difference was significant (P0.05); "nausea" dimension (3.23 + 1.28,4.03 + 1.52) was lower than that of admission (3.72 + 1.54,4.78 + 1.82). The difference was significant (P0.01). In the control group, "good body" dimension and "good psychological" dimension (3.56 + 1.23,4.15) after 2 weeks. The difference was significantly lower than that of admission (4.11 + 0.98,4.77 + 1.22), and the difference was significant (P0.05); the dimension of "nausea" and "the difficulty of cancer" (4.47 + 2.01,3.33 + 1.29) were higher than that of admission (4.46 + 3.21,3.21 + 1.04), the total average, and the "good social" dimension (3.87 + 0.37,5.49 + 1.11) were lower than that of admission (3.88 + 0.52,5.55 + 4.11), but the difference was not (P0.05). (7) the hospital anxiety and Depression Scale score: the total score, the anxiety score and the depression score (13.23 + 3.12,5.99 + 2.13,7.87 + 2.24) in the group ICGMT were lower than that of the admission (16.12 + 3.67,6.67 2.31,9.45 + 2.78), and the difference was significant (P0.01); the total score, anxiety score, and depression score (19.23 + 3.16,8.99 + 4.13,10.87 + 2.24) in the control group were 2 weeks later. ) higher than the admission (17.13 + 4.57,6.98 + 2.39,9.85 + 2.18), the difference was significant (P0.01). (8) room tree man test: 2 weeks after the intervention of group ICGMT, the content of room tree man painting was more full, the layout of each part was complete and no missing, the proportion was moderate, the line head was continuous, the picture was clear, the pen touched the fruit, no repeated modification marks, the picture allegedly more active more sunshine, disappear. After 2 weeks of the control group, the overall picture clarity did not improve obviously, the whole picture was still incomplete, the picture was still monotonous, the whole image was seriously biased toward the drawing side, the size ratio was still unbalance, the pen was weak, the line was irresolute, the lines were bending, the picture implied negative sadness. The positive projection points significantly reduced the results of.3. patients' physiological index (1) group ICGMT after psychological intervention, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, heart rate and respiratory value (129.55 + 7.23,80.31 + 8.09,84.55 + 4.38,17.47 + 1.35) were lower than those at admission (134.78 + 7.57,85.77 + 9.23,87.11 + 8.22,19.56 + 2.11), and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the group and the admission group. (2) the comparison of brain wave and skin electricity and skin temperature: after 2 weeks of ICGMT intervention, the value of alpha wave (35.94 + 0.98) was higher than that of admission (34.85 + 1.69), and the value of theta wave (3.69 + 1.61) was lower than that of admission (4.68 + 1.78) (4.68 + 1.78), and the difference was all (P0.01). After the control group, theta wave (28.71 + 4.56) was higher than the admission (24.51) after 2 weeks (24.51). 8.21), the value of alpha wave (9.39 + 3.52) was lower than admission (11.65 + 4.94). The difference was significant (P0.01) in group.ICGMT and control group, there was no significant difference in skin electrical value, skin temperature, beta wave value and SMR wave value (P0.05). (3) immune cells Ig A, Ig G, Ig M, NK comparison: 2 weeks after ICGMT group intervention (2.55 + 3.) 23,14.87+4.27,1.48 + 0.13,0.35 + 0.47) was higher than that of admission (2.29 + 2.10,10.43+3.14,1.01 + 0.88,0.21 + 0.23), and the difference was significant (P0.05). After 2 weeks in the control group, Ig A, Ig G, Ig M, and NK cell values were lower than those of the admission (2.18 + and 2.18 + 0.21), and the difference was significant 0.05).4. clinical qualitative evaluation of most patients with middle and late stage lung cancer think that the computer game version of open-minded treatment is lively and interesting, close to life, reproduces the patient's innermost inner entanglement; rich philosophic, through the transfer of easy understanding to the patient, correct their distorted cognition and extreme ideas; simple operation, suitable for different age levels. Make patients suffer from different ages. No matter in heart and body condition, psychological coping, adjustment way, quality of life and physiological index, the patient is well received. Conclusion: the individual computer game version of open-minded treatment is a standard, vivid, practical and effective psychological intervention, helping the patients develop a positive and optimistic attitude towards life and achieve an open-minded life. This treatment has a positive effect on improving the psychosomatic condition, psychological response, adjustment mode, social function and quality of life for patients with middle and advanced lung cancer, and also has relatively large improvement on the patient's physiological index, especially the immune function. As an effective psychological intervention formula, it helps the patients with lung cancer improve the quality of life. The post cancer clinical work provides a strong empirical basis.
【学位授予单位】:广东药科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R734.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯雅丽;;“打败”电脑游戏[J];祝您健康;2002年08期
2 杨励;高中学生沉迷于电脑游戏的行为及相关因素研究[J];中国学校卫生;2002年03期
3 卜卫;;女孩的电脑游戏[J];父母必读;1998年11期
4 黄体乾;电游戏对儿童心理健康的消极影响[J];中国学校卫生;1998年06期
5 ;电脑游戏影响孩子记忆力[J];家庭教育(中小学生家长);2009年03期
6 魏庆;孙孟杨;;电脑游戏也治病[J];家庭医学;2012年06期
7 张璇;谢敏;胡晓晴;葛少华;郑全全;;大学生电脑游戏成瘾及其影响因素初探[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2006年02期
8 伍美玲;沈晓娜;孙美祺;郑乐炫;刘韵;党彩萍;;大学生电脑游戏成瘾对人际关系及孤独感的影响[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2013年09期
9 新晨;沉溺电脑游戏易患“游戏脑”综合症[J];世界发明;2003年09期
10 ;男性热衷电脑游戏之谜破解[J];祝您健康;2009年08期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 黄萍;;青少年电脑游戏成瘾的危害及戒除对策[A];中国犯罪学研究会第十四届学术研讨会论文集(上册)[C];2005年
2 沈峥嵘;;电脑游戏:让人终身眷恋的“玩”中“学”[A];江苏省教育学会2006年年会论文集(理科专辑)[C];2006年
3 刘f ;;小学生迷恋电脑游戏的原因及对策[A];中国心理卫生协会青少年心理卫生专业委员会第九届全国学术年会论文集[C];2005年
4 苏依勒图;;小学生怎样健康上网[A];国家教师科研基金“十一五”成果集(中国名校卷)(二)[C];2009年
5 伍沛琳;;对79名学习电脑游戏儿童的心理性探讨[A];中国心理卫生协会第四届学术大会论文汇编[C];2003年
6 刘珠江;;电脑游戏——可为博物馆文化传播所用的新载体[A];新世纪博物馆的实践与思考——北京博物馆学会第五届学术会议论文集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 汤世明;孩子迷恋“电脑游戏”,咋办?[N];中国医药报;2002年
2 张力;电脑游戏市场硬起来了[N];中国信息报;2001年
3 魏岳江;电脑游戏已设计战争 游戏软件正训练打仗[N];北京日报;2007年
4 本报编辑部编译;孩子能从电脑游戏中得到什么[N];中国经济导报;2006年
5 孙浩;恨“夺命”游戏,英国母亲绝地反击[N];新华每日电讯;2006年
6 ;荷兰:欲戒电脑游戏瘾,还需“游戏疗法”[N];新华每日电讯;2007年
7 吴思佳;美医生呼吁:沉溺电脑游戏应列入精神病[N];新华每日电讯;2007年
8 杜飞 高海亮 么振超;电脑游戏练兵应当慎行[N];解放军报;2008年
9 总参某部 魏岳江 徐楚翘;电脑游戏:美俄训练未来战士的一种手段[N];光明日报;2009年
10 寿山;电脑游戏外设小产品 大市场[N];中国质量报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 袁晓雨;个体电脑游戏版豁达治疗对中晚期肺癌作用的研究[D];广东药科大学;2016年
2 韩庆年;电脑游戏中的学习过程与学习模式研究[D];南京师范大学;2003年
3 盛国穗;教育类电脑游戏的问题解决策略[D];湖南师范大学;2006年
4 何威;建构与交互:对新媒介电脑游戏的研究[D];清华大学;2003年
5 费安翔;电脑游戏的审美价值[D];北京师范大学;2008年
6 王昕;电脑游戏对幼儿社会性发展的影响[D];陕西师范大学;2014年
7 林燕;大学生电脑游戏活动中流畅体验问卷的编制与实测[D];西南大学;2010年
8 张永乐;游戏化以及异化:电脑游戏对大学生影响的实证研究[D];南京大学;2012年
9 刘迎蒸;电脑游戏造型对产品形态的影响及应用研究[D];湖南大学;2004年
10 郭粹;电脑游戏的设计与实现[D];电子科技大学;2006年
,本文编号:2171845
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2171845.html