膀胱癌组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒的安全性评估
[Abstract]:Objective: Currently, the treatment of bladder cancer is still mainly surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy; in addition, it also includes adjuvant chemotherapy to improve the therapeutic effect of tumor. Nevertheless, bladder cancer still has a high recurrence rate. Specific proliferation and killing of tumor cells in bladder cancer cells is an important method for tumor targeted therapy. At present, the efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus has been studied, but the safety and toxicity of oncolytic adenovirus are still controversial. The reported toxicity of oncolytic adenovirus mainly focuses on acute toxicity test. The reproductive toxicity of oncolytic adenovirus (oncolytic adenovirus Ad-PSCAE-UP II-E1A), which was constructed in our laboratory, has not been reported for a long time. Methods: Beijing Wujiahe Company was commissioned to amplify, purify and identify the adenovirus Ad-PSCAE-UP II-E1A (APU-E1A), which has been constructed in our laboratory. The mice were purchased from the animal laboratory of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The whole safety evaluation system is divided into three parts: acute toxicity test, general reproductive toxicity test and teratogenic toxicity test. Acute toxicity is to inject the amplified oncolytic adenovirus into the abdominal cavity of mice by intraperitoneal administration, observe the changes of behavior and weight of mice, and sacrifice the mice 14 days later to detect the lymphatic fineness in the blood of mice. Cell and platelet levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and glutamic oxaloacetic aminotransferase (AST) in the liver were measured; histological sections were stained with HE to observe the microscopic pathological changes of oncolytic adenovirus in various tissues and organs. Firstly, male mice were administered by intramuscular injection for 28 days in succession, and the time of administration was every other day. Female mice were administered by intramuscular injection for 14 days in succession after two weeks in male mice. After successful mating, the pregnant mice were divided into two parts. One part was euthanized 16 days after conception, then the fetus was removed, the viscera and skin were removed and stained to observe the bone changes. The teratogenic dosage regimen: female mice after mating were administered on the sixth day, once every other day, until the 14th day after conception; one was euthanized on the 16th day, fetal mice were taken out to observe the changes of embryonic skeletal structure; the other was born naturally for 30 days, and the growth and development were observed. Results In the acute toxicity test of mice, abdominal pain such as writhing occurred in mice, and the weight of mice in the experimental group increased faster than that of the control group, with statistical differences; in addition, in the experiment of mice anatomical discovery. The abdominal cavity of mice in group A showed blood ascites, and the liver showed subacute severe hepatitis. The liver tissue of mice in group A showed severe necrosis of liver tissue, and the normal structure of liver lobules was destroyed. There were no significant changes in the nest weight and placental weight of fetal mice between the middle and high dose groups. There was no significant difference in the length and tail length of fetal mice. The difference was found in the weight growth curve of mice, probably due to differences between individuals and in the weight of pregnant females. During the teratogenic test in mice, the differences in placenta and nest weight between the low, medium and high dose groups and the control group were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in fetal and tail lengths. During the development of the offspring, weight gain was statistically significant. However, from the growth curve of the mice, the difference was not significant, because the growth curves of the mice showed little difference between the groups, so Conclusion: The adenovirus-specific adenovirus of bladder tissue (ADPSCAE-UPII-E1AAR) (APU-E1A-AR) may have more severe hepatotoxicity in acute toxicity test, and the liver may be the target organ of oncolytic adenovirus. In the general reproductive toxicity test and teratogenic toxicity test in mice, there was no significant difference between the tissues. Therefore, it was considered that the oncolytic adenovirus we constructed had little effect on the reproductive system of mice and was a relatively safe swelling. Gene therapy biologics for tumors have less impact on fertility and teratogenesis in pregnant patients and health care workers responsible for cancer treatment
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R737.14
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何向东;王志平;;构建溶瘤腺病毒的策略[J];微生物学免疫学进展;2007年01期
2 张培影;韩从辉;郝林;贺厚光;董秉政;范涛;贡震;胡建鹏;;表达金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素A基因的条件增殖型溶瘤腺病毒的构建[J];中华临床医师杂志(电子版);2009年08期
3 范涛;郝林;贺厚光;梁清;董秉政;胡建鹏;韩从辉;;表达超抗原SEA基因的溶瘤腺病毒载体的构建与鉴定(英文)[J];现代生物医学进展;2010年15期
4 何婉婉;周立;刘涛;阮江星;何滨霞;李阿荣;王毅刚;;溶瘤腺病毒作为癌症基因治疗载体的研究进展及安全性评价[J];中国细胞生物学学报;2013年09期
5 周立;何婉婉;朱桢楠;杨远勤;赵红芳;马步云;王毅刚;;溶瘤腺病毒靶向癌症治疗的临床研究进展[J];中国生物工程杂志;2013年12期
6 晏阳;杜晓辉;李荣;;溶瘤腺病毒抗肿瘤策略研究进展[J];解放军医学院学报;2013年12期
7 周小龙;唐文如;;溶瘤腺病毒治疗肿瘤的研究进展[J];病毒学报;2014年03期
8 张金合;戴平;;溶瘤腺病毒的靶向性策略[J];生命的化学;2006年01期
9 时辉;车国卫;;转录靶向性溶瘤腺病毒治疗肺癌研究的现状与思考[J];中华肿瘤防治杂志;2011年13期
10 谭晓华;;溶瘤腺病毒肿瘤靶向治疗:从实验室到临床[J];中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志;2012年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王莹;王云贵;金洁;钱其军;钱文斌;;嵌合型溶瘤腺病毒对造血干细胞体外净化作用的研究[A];2009年浙江省中医药学会血液病学术年会、浙江省中西医结合学会血液病学术年会暨国家级中西医结合血液病新进展继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2009年
2 曹晖;苏长青;谭淑萍;陈颖;钱其军;;一种具有抗肿瘤活性的新型溶瘤腺病毒[A];2007年全国生化与生物技术药物学术年会论文集[C];2007年
3 浦颖艳;方琳;沈权;孙丽君;胡小翠;王艳;曹祥荣;苏长青;;肿瘤特异性溶瘤腺病毒载体的构建及表达的初步研究[A];江苏省遗传学会第七届二次代表大会暨学术研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2008年
4 俞德超;;能在机体内产生个性化肿瘤免疫反应的重组溶瘤腺病毒[A];第九届全国肿瘤生物治疗学术会议论文集[C];2006年
5 方超;任臻;叶迅;陆瑾;刘芳;陈红专;;携带HSP基因重组溶瘤腺病毒的肿瘤基因治疗研究[A];中国药理学会第九次全国会员代表大会暨全国药理学术会议论文集[C];2007年
6 毛晨宇;滕理送;曹江;;由hTERT和cox-2启动子调控的溶瘤腺病毒的构建及抗瘤研究[A];第二届中国医学细胞生物学学术大会暨细胞生物学教学改革会议论文集[C];2008年
7 郑骏年;刘晓昀;毛立军;史震;刘俊杰;;表达IL-18的溶瘤腺病毒对裸鼠肾癌移植瘤生长及血管形成抑制作用[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
8 刘彦群;;携带人IL-18基因的溶瘤腺病毒并研究其在A375细胞中IL-18基因的表达[A];中华医学会第14次全国皮肤性病学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
9 王华;李德川;陈贵平;赵阳;李方印;;E1A,E1B双突变溶瘤腺病毒AxdAdB-3联合Gemcitabine治疗肾癌的实验研究[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
10 王华;李德川;陈贵平;赵阳;鞠海星;李方印;;E1A,E1B双突变溶瘤腺病毒AxdAdB-3联合Gemcitabine治疗肾癌的实验研究[A];2008年浙江省泌尿外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 赫东芸;表达新城疫病毒血凝素-神经氨酸酶基因溶瘤腺病毒体内、外抗肿瘤作用[D];吉林大学;2015年
2 冉黎;肿瘤细胞来源的微颗粒携带溶瘤腺病毒杀伤肿瘤细胞初步探讨[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
3 胡泽斌;溶瘤腺病毒载体系统的构建及其功能研究[D];中国人民解放军军事医学科学院;2008年
4 王芳;膀胱组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒在动物体内的生物分布及安全性评价[D];兰州大学;2013年
5 贺厚光;双调控溶瘤腺病毒携带超抗原SEA基因治疗前列腺癌基础研究[D];苏州大学;2010年
6 黄晓园;新型溶瘤腺病毒M1体内应用的效应和安全性研究及靶向性输送的探索[D];华中科技大学;2007年
7 齐荣;携带XAF1的复制型溶瘤腺病毒治疗恶性肿瘤的研究[D];上海交通大学;2008年
8 邱松波;携带hTRAIL的复制型溶瘤腺病毒治疗恶性肿瘤的研究[D];武汉大学;2004年
9 刘新建;携带mda-7/IL24的嵌合型溶瘤腺病毒对wnt信号异常肿瘤的靶向基因—病毒治疗[D];上海交通大学;2011年
10 韩志强;选择性封闭肿瘤STAT3的新型溶瘤腺病毒M3的构建及应用[D];华中科技大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘品一;基因溶瘤腺病毒SG635-SF对卵巢癌的作用研究[D];浙江理工大学;2015年
2 石鑫;重组溶瘤腺病毒RCAdC68.pⅨ-EGFP的构建及其对结肠癌细胞增殖的影响[D];苏州大学;2015年
3 李冲;膀胱癌特异性的嵌合型溶瘤腺病毒构建及其疗效初步评价[D];兰州大学;2016年
4 鲁克庆;膀胱癌组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒的安全性评估[D];兰州大学;2016年
5 赵津;重组溶瘤腺病毒对人肿瘤细胞的体内、外抑制作用研究[D];长春工业大学;2016年
6 周丽君;重组溶瘤腺病毒rAd-E1A-CDglyTK的构建和体内、外抑杀瘤作用的实验研究[D];天津医科大学;2008年
7 杨耿兵;新型溶瘤腺病毒靶向治疗恶性肿瘤的研究[D];浙江理工大学;2011年
8 李仁举;一氧化氮对膀胱癌组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒基因治疗的作用[D];兰州大学;2011年
9 胡永超;溶瘤腺病毒治疗实体瘤安全性及临床疗效的初步评价[D];山西医科大学;2011年
10 祁媚姣;超氧阴离子对膀胱癌组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒基因治疗的作用[D];兰州大学;2013年
,本文编号:2196006
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2196006.html