5-羟甲基胞嘧啶在无功能垂体腺瘤中的变化及其调节机制研究
[Abstract]:Background Epigenetic modification plays an important role in tumorigenesis. 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine (5hmC) is related to DNA demethylation and is one of the important ways of DNA molecular epigenetic regulation. It has been found that the overall level and regulation pattern of 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine (5hmC) in various tumors, such as renal cancer, breast cancer, glioma, etc. have changed significantly. Body 10/11 translocation family protein 2 (TET2) is a hydrogen peroxidase that catalyzes 5-methyl-cytosine (5mC) to form 5-hmC and continues to catalyze the formation of 5-formyl-cytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxy-cytosine (5caC). Mutations in TET2 are common in hematological diseases and affect the level of 5-hmC. The expression and localization of TET2 protein are also directly related to the level of 5-hmC. Studies have confirmed that epigenetic alterations are also involved in the development of pituitary adenomas, but it is not clear whether 5hmC is involved in the development of pituitary adenomas. Objective To detect the changes of cytosine modification in the whole genome of NFPAs, analyze the effect of the mutation of TET2 gene, protein expression and localization on the 5hmC level, and explore the mechanism of the changes in the 5hmC level. Group A, 5 hmC genome level of NFPAs and normal pituitary were measured; secondly, some regions of exon TET2 were sequenced in all samples of NFPAs, and the mutations were detected; thirdly, TET2 immunohistochemical staining was performed in NFPAs and normal pituitary. Methods 57 cases of NFPAs (57 cases) were selected for ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-M). S/MS analysis and TET2 exon partial region sequencing, 26 cases of immunohistochemical staining, 6 cases of normal pituitary gland (5 cases of UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis, 1 case of immunohistochemical staining), collection and collation of clinical data, NFPAs were divided into two groups: invasive and non-invasive, by Beijing Union Medical College Hospital neurosurgery two experienced doctors according to imaging. The total levels of NFPAs and 5 hmC of normal pituitary genome were compared by mass spectrometry. The TET2 coding region was amplified by PCR and sequenced. The expression and localization of TET2 protein were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining. The expression level was expressed by H-score value of software analysis. The overall level of 5 hmC in NFPAs was significantly lower than that in normal pituitary (0.38 8240 (0.13-1.23 82) vs 2.47 82 (0.82-2.86 82), P 0.0001, 0.82-2.86 82), 0.82-2.86 82), while the overall level of 5 caC was significantly higher (0.20% o (0.20% o (0.04-0.24% o) vs 0.16 82 (0.14-0.14-0.19 82), P = 0.005) in patients with lower level of normal pitpituitary (0.38 82 82 (0.13-1.13-1.23 82) vs 2.47 82 (0.47 023), higher Ki-67 index There was no significant difference in age, sex, course of disease, invasiveness, P53 and Knosp grade between the low 5hmC group and the high 5hmC group. There was no significant difference in 5hmC level between the non-invasive group and the invasive group (0.44% o (0.15-1.04% o) vs 0.35% o (0.13-1.23% o), P = 0.30). There were three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) loci in the positive strand, corresponding to three amino acid changes at TET2 p.P29R, p.L1721W and p.I1762V. The levels of 5 hmC in TET2 R29 group were significantly lower than those in P29 group (0.25 (0.13-0.80) vs 0.46% o (0.16-1.23), P = 0.013, TET2 p.L1721W, p.l1762V) and TET2 had no significant effect on 5 hmC levels. Total expression of TET2 and nuclear expression were moderately positively correlated (r = 0.461, P = 0.018; r = 0.458, P = 0.019). Immunohistochemical samples were divided into two groups according to the level of 5 hmC detected by mass spectrometry. Total expression of TET2 and nuclear expression in 5 hmC group were significantly higher than those in 5 hmC group (192.78 [79.87] vs 129.58 [60.18], P = 0.032; 121.49 [49.21] vs 80.07 [36.68], P = 0.032, respectively. There was no significant difference in the expression and localization of TET2 between the non-invasive group and the invasive group. Conclusion 1. There was a deletion of 5hmC in the whole genome in NFPAs. The lower the 5hmC level indicates that the larger the tumor diameter, the higher the Ki-67 index, suggesting that the decrease of DNA hydroxymethylation may be involved in the tumorigenesis of NFPAs, and is related to the tumor size and Ki-67 index. With the total expression of TET2, the overall level of 5 hmC increased, suggesting that the change of 5 hmC level may be affected by the expression of TET2 and subcellular localization.
【学位授予单位】:北京协和医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R736.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 柴青芬,王晓琪,黄其鎏,郑卫权;底节区无功能嗜酸细胞性垂体腺瘤1例报告[J];第一军医大学学报;2000年01期
2 任祖渊;努力提高垂体腺瘤的诊断和治疗水平[J];中华神经外科杂志;2000年03期
3 汪三合;垂体腺瘤误诊为慢性单纯性青光眼1例原因浅析[J];山西临床医药;2000年10期
4 金许洪,金晨宇,朱惠军;垂体腺瘤术后的中西医治疗[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2000年23期
5 刘学键,李克雷,苏传富;垂体腺瘤33例误诊分析[J];职业与健康;2000年02期
6 魏新亭,罗世祺;垂体腺瘤p16基因启动子甲基化分析[J];河南实用神经疾病杂志;2001年04期
7 闫志钧,林志国,沈红,李庆国,隋立森,浦松;垂体腺瘤的X刀治疗[J];立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志;2001年04期
8 赵明,刘伟国,杨小锋;老年人垂体腺瘤的诊断与治疗[J];浙江创伤外科;2001年03期
9 马增路;垂体腺瘤误诊55例分析[J];中国综合临床;2002年06期
10 窦万臣,马超,王任直,任祖渊;复发性垂体腺瘤的诊断和治疗[J];中华神经外科杂志;2002年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 林志仁;程刚;;X线分次立体适形放疗垂体腺瘤35例[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 魏宇佳;;老年人垂体腺瘤临床特征及随诊分析[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
3 王树兴;李学芝;纪宇明;田维东;彭龙峰;姜京超;杨军;;老年人垂体腺瘤手术治疗(附30例临床分析)[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 王任直;;规范化治疗是提高垂体腺瘤诊治水平的关键[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会首届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2005年
5 潘红日;周开宇;金涌;王广涛;;经鼻蝶入路显微手术治疗垂体腺瘤[A];2005年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
6 傅伟明;龚江标;李谷;郑秀珏;杨小锋;刘伟国;;巨大垂体腺瘤分次手术治疗探讨[A];2007浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
7 牛焕江;王义荣;朱先理;杨树旭;孙伟军;臧国尧;李新伟;方兵;钱聪;甘海鹏;;微骨孔入路手术治疗垂体腺瘤疗效分析[A];2007浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
8 邹杰;冯正国;;垂体腺瘤的眼部改变和误诊分析[A];中国眼底病论坛·全国眼底病专题学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2008年
9 曾梅芳;蒋翠萍;赵雪兰;吴蔚;苗青;张琼月;黄杉;何敏;张烁;杨叶虹;李士其;赵耀;叶红英;李益明;;垂体腺瘤术后垂体前叶功能减退及替代治疗情况研究[A];中华医学会第十次全国内分泌学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
10 刘光耀;王宁;武玉刚;战华;孟祥喜;赵世光;;白细胞介素-18在人类垂体腺瘤组织中的表达及分布[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王任直;应用循证医学 诊治垂体腺瘤[N];健康报;2007年
2 刘桥斌 特约记者 林夕夕;大多垂体腺瘤不需治疗[N];健康时报;2007年
3 健康时报特约记者 朱丽丽;突然闭经排查垂体腺瘤[N];健康时报;2007年
4 本报记者 马艳红;规范治疗垂体腺瘤任务迫切[N];中国医药报;2006年
5 本报记者 钟思思;垂体腺瘤 找出病源防误诊[N];保健时报;2004年
6 ;脑垂体腺瘤表相在四肢躯干[N];北京日报;2006年
7 本报记者 李颖;身体变形 警惕垂体腺瘤[N];科技日报;2014年
8 高素英;垂体腺瘤高发不容忽视[N];中国医药报;2014年
9 李士其;老年人垂体腺瘤与微创手术治疗[N];中国中医药报;2004年
10 记者 匡远深 通讯员 赵晶晶;内镜加盟“搞定”垂体腺瘤[N];健康报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 徐艺文;5-羟甲基胞嘧啶在无功能垂体腺瘤中的变化及其调节机制研究[D];北京协和医学院;2016年
2 马林;垂体腺瘤分子生物学特征和手术治疗的研究[D];天津医科大学;2006年
3 陈来照;神经肽Y及其受体在垂体腺瘤中的表达及意义[D];天津医科大学;2006年
4 夏学巍;过氧化物酶增殖物激活受体γ激动剂治疗垂体腺瘤的实验研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2005年
5 唐建建;骨桥蛋白与垂体腺瘤侵袭性的相关性研究[D];四川大学;2006年
6 黄垂学;过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ配体对垂体腺瘤生长的影响及其作用机制的研究[D];中南大学;2007年
7 李强;缺氧微环境对垂体腺瘤侵袭性变化的影响[D];中南大学;2008年
8 王剑新;垂体腺瘤生长方式的相关形态学研究[D];南方医科大学;2011年
9 马四海;垂体腺瘤细胞培养及替莫唑胺治疗难治性垂体腺瘤的实验研究[D];北京协和医学院;2011年
10 刘海生;内镜扩大经蝶入路治疗巨大垂体腺瘤的解剖学与临床研究[D];吉林大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘琦;基质金属蛋白酶和血管内皮生长因子表达与垂体腺瘤侵袭性关系的研究[D];苏州大学;2005年
2 姜海洋;垂体腺瘤术后低钠血症与血浆B型脑钠肽水平的相关性研究[D];兰州大学;2015年
3 陶晓e,
本文编号:2201895
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2201895.html