晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌应用贝伐单抗疗效的预测因素分析
[Abstract]:Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignancies and the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Most patients with NSCLC are diagnosed at advanced stage (stage III B or IV) and have poor prognosis. In recent years, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), anaplastic lymphoma kinase The use of tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (ALK) opens a new chapter in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, only a few patients with NSCLC have EGFR or ALK-driven genes. For patients with negative driving genes, chemotherapy with platinum is still the standard treatment. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, which has been proved by many studies. Bevacizumab can further improve the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, but its objective Resonse Rate (ORR) is only 35% - 54%, which means that not all patients can benefit from bevacizumab treatment. Many researchers have explored predictors of the efficacy of bevacizumab. Objective To investigate the predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in advanced non-phosphorus NSCLC. Objective: To explore the predictors of the efficacy of bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC by analyzing the basic characteristics, pathological features, tumor markers, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and blood biochemical parameters of patients, and to screen the most beneficiary population of bevacizumab so as to guide the clinical application of bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC. Methods The clinical data of 112 advanced NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab in Shandong Cancer Hospital from June 2011 to January 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The basic features, pathological features, tumor markers, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and blood biochemistry were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier test, log-rank test, univariate Cox regression analysis were used for univariate analysis, and P0.1 was included in multivariate analysis; multivariate Cox regression was used to further analyze the effect of related factors on progression-free survival (PFS) after bevacizumab treatment, with statistical significance at p0.05. The median follow-up time was 2-36 months on January 20, 2017, with a median follow-up time of 11 months. The median PFS of all patients treated with bevacizumab was 11 months. 3, P = 0.028, double lung metastases (ORR 37.1%, 967 2 = 9.455, P = 0.002), pre-application metastasites (< 2 (ORR 41.2%, 962 = 5.216, P = 0.022), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (< 2.29 (ORR 37.0%, 962 = 5.099, P = 0.024), platelet lymphocyte ratio (96let, PLlet, lymphocyte ratio 962 = 5.216, P = 5.216, P = 0.022, P = 0.022), neutrophil lymphocyte lymphocyte ratio (NLR), NLR < 2.29 (ORR 37.0%, 967 2 = 1 Patients with mean platelet volume (MPV) less than 9.9 fL (ORR 36.7%, 2 = 5.873, P = 0.015) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) less than 179.5 U/L (ORR 43.8%, 2 = 18.223, P = 0.000) had a high response rate and a statistically significant difference in the long-term efficacy of bevacizumab. 9672 = 3.557, P = 0.057, P = 0.059, lobe (962 = 34.987, P = 0.000), lobe (962 = 34.987, P = 0.000), anatomtyping (962 = 12.853, P = 0.000), concurrentchemotherapy regimen (962 = 14.602, P = 0.000), time of application of bevacizum (962 = 14.577, P = 0.001), T stage (962 = 4.382 = 4.389, P = 0.N6, N stage (962 = 4.Nstage = 4.Nstage (962 = 4.Nstage), N stage (962 = 3.Nstage (962 = 3.962 = 3.Nstage 149, P = 0.0076, number of metastatic sites (_2 = 3.141, P = 0.076) Liver metastasis, liver metastasis (962 = 7.758, P = 0.005), bone metasta (962 = 4.34, P = 0.037), hemoglobin (HGB) (962 = 3.288, P = 0.070), LDH (962 = 4.266, P = 0.039), albumin (Albumin, ALB) levels (962 = 7.324, P = 0.004, P = 0.007), D2aggregate (962 = 7.2 = 7.403, P = 2 = 7.3, P = 3, P = P = 0.003, P = 0.007) and the use of albumin (albumin, albumin, albumin, albumin, albumin, There is a correlation between the efficacy of Vamvastatin. We have multiple reasons for this. The results showed that age (HR = 4.133, P = 0.007), lobe (HR = 37.206, P = 0.000), primary tumor T stage (HR = 0.114, P = 0.000), bone metastasis (HR = 2.685, P = 0.044), LDH level (HR = 0.245, P = 0.012), ALB level (HR = 7.670, P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In this population, 60 years of age, lower lobe tumors, T1-T2 tumors before bevacizumab administration, no bone metastasis, ALB42.1g/L before bevacizumab, LDH < 179.5U/L were independent prognostic factors for bevacizumab administration.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R734.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 裘雁冰;陆益;吴洪斌;凌云华;;贝伐单抗及其联用化疗方案的不良反应[J];药物不良反应杂志;2006年06期
2 刘淑英;王晓稼;;贝伐单抗在肿瘤治疗中相关毒副反应[J];肿瘤学杂志;2009年12期
3 陈万灵;欧阳学农;;新药贝伐单抗的临床应用进展[J];中国肿瘤;2010年08期
4 崔斐;李军;罗荣城;;贝伐单抗在肿瘤临床治疗中的研究进展[J];河北医学;2008年06期
5 白琼;;贝伐单抗临床研究进展[J];首都医药;2006年22期
6 朱丽婷;;贝伐单抗治疗晚期恶性肿瘤的护理[J];临床和实验医学杂志;2008年09期
7 余锋;熊建萍;;贝伐单抗临床应用进展[J];药品评价;2007年04期
8 封宇飞,雷静,傅得兴;血管内皮生长因子抑制剂——贝伐单抗[J];中国药学杂志;2005年19期
9 徐亮;李建军;游启生;;从贝伐单抗应用的窘境议医疗管理政策的瓶颈[J];眼科;2011年05期
10 杜丰;依荷芭丽·迟;王金万;;贝伐单抗疗效预测因素的研究进展[J];中国肿瘤临床;2012年19期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 应杰儿;徐琦;刘碧霞;赵亚珍;顾琳慧;冯建国;;不同剂量贝伐单抗对荷结肠癌细胞裸鼠移植瘤炎症因子表达的影响[A];中国肿瘤内科进展 中国肿瘤医师教育(2014)[C];2014年
2 吴瀚峰;潘力;王恩敏;戴嘉中;梅广海;王鑫;刘晓霞;张南;王滨江;于同刚;董亚非;;贝伐单抗治疗立体定向放射外科治疗后相关反应7例报道并文献复习[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
3 徐琦;刘碧霞;顾琳慧;郑爽爽;周卫民;应杰儿;冯建国;;不同剂量贝伐单抗对荷结肠癌细胞裸鼠移植瘤炎症因子表达的影响[A];2013年浙江省肛肠外科学术年会暨结直肠疾病的微创及综合治疗新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2013年
4 吴瀚峰;潘力;王恩敏;戴嘉中;梅广海;王鑫;刘晓霞;张南;王滨江;于同刚;董亚非;;贝伐单抗治疗立体定向放射外科治疗后相关反应七例报告并文献复习[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第六届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2011年
5 王升晔;杜向慧;;贝伐单抗在乳腺癌治疗中的疗效和风险评估[A];2013华东胸部肿瘤论坛暨第六届浙江省胸部肿瘤论坛论文集[C];2013年
6 张雪鹏;孙影;;PDT联合贝伐单抗治疗裸鼠U87胶质瘤的实验研究[A];第五届全国中医药免疫学术研讨会——暨环境·免疫与肿瘤防治综合交叉会议论文汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 本报特约撰稿人 陆志城;贝伐单抗:下一个重磅炸弹[N];医药经济报;2005年
2 ;贝伐单抗[N];医药经济报;2005年
3 潘宗炎 丁鼎乐;贝伐单抗可望改变癌症治疗方向[N];中国中医药报;2005年
4 余志平;兰尼单抗、贝伐单抗,竞相争锋[N];中国医药报;2007年
5 ;生存时间可延长4个月[N];医药经济报;2004年
6 张柳;贝伐单抗治疗乳腺癌具有良好效果[N];中国医药报;2008年
7 白冰 提供;贝伐单抗加紫杉醇可控制乳癌[N];中国医药报;2007年
8 许关煜;贝伐单抗与呼吸道食道瘘[N];医药经济报;2007年
9 张旭;含贝伐单抗的治疗方案可延长卵巢癌患者无疾病恶化生存期[N];中国医药报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 杜池刚;TGFB1、ENG、ACVRL1基因多态性AVM相关研究及贝伐单抗对GBM治疗效果的meta分析[D];山东大学;2016年
2 程钢炜;贝伐单抗对大鼠结膜成纤维细胞生长及滤过术后瘢痕化的影响[D];北京协和医学院;2011年
3 王岩;1.中国人群UGT1A基因多态性与伊立替康毒性的相关性研究 2.贝伐单抗联合SN-38抑制大肠癌和血管内皮细胞增殖及其机制研究[D];中国人民解放军军事医学科学院;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陶累累;贝伐单抗联合细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞对非小细胞肺癌的抑制作用及机制研究[D];南京大学;2014年
2 李步托;晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌应用贝伐单抗疗效的预测因素分析[D];山东大学;2017年
3 孙婷婷;贝伐单抗对耐药鼻咽癌细胞凋亡的影响[D];南方医科大学;2009年
4 赵梦瑶;年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体腔内注射贝伐单抗后房水中血管内皮生长因子和贝伐单抗浓度变化[D];大连医科大学;2013年
5 简妮娅;贝伐单抗治疗新生血管性青光眼的系统评价[D];新疆医科大学;2013年
6 刘琳;兔眼前房注射贝伐单抗的药物分布及毒副作用的实验研究[D];大连医科大学;2009年
7 白云潇;玻璃体腔内注射贝伐单抗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性注射周期分析[D];新乡医学院;2014年
8 路慧s,
本文编号:2242455
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2242455.html