内镜下切除术在食管及贲门固有肌层肿瘤治疗中的应用
[Abstract]:Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) in the treatment of esophageal and cardiac muscular propria tumors (MPTs). Methods: The clinical and pathological data of 53 patients who underwent ESE and STER in the center of digestive endoscopy of Chengdu Military Region General Hospital from January 2013 to October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Main outcome measures: operative time, intraoperative complications, total resection rate, occurrence and recurrence of adverse events after operation. Subgroup analysis was performed according to postoperative pathology and lesion site. Results: 1. 53 patients, 16 males and 37 females, with an average age of 50.38 (+ 8.15 years), were included in this study. MPTs were 20. 13 [13.56 mm], 43.4% (23/53) of the esophagus and 56.6% (30/53) of the cardia, 28.3% (15/53) of leiomyomas, 67.9% (36/53) of stromal tumors, and 3.8% (2/53) of other tumors (neuroendocrine tumors, lipomas, etc.). 2. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed that the overall coincidence rate at the source level was 100%; The coincidence rate of degeneration was 62.3% (33/53), including 87.5% (21/24) of stromal tumors and 44.4% (12/27) of leiomyomas, and the accuracy of diagnosing stromal tumors (_~2 = 6.24, P = 0.012) was significantly higher in patients with EUS with irregular shape MPTS than that of leiomyomas (_~2 = 6.24, P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the total resection rate between the two groups (STER 95.8% VS ESE 96.6%, P 0.05); the operation time in STER group was significantly longer than that in ESE group (140.46 65507 The intraoperative complications in ER group were lower than those in ESE group (4.2% VS 17.2%, P 0.05); the total postoperative complications rate was 22.6% (12/53) (4 patients had two postoperative complications simultaneously), including infection rate 11.3% (6/53), gas-related complications 11.3% (6/53), small amount of pleural effusion 5.7% (3/53), delayed hemorrhage 1.9% (1/53); Esophageal MPTS and ESE were significantly shorter than STER (43.42 17.89 6550 Compared with ESE, MPTs and STER had longer operation time (127.08 VS 71.76 Regression model analysis showed that MPTs with large diameter and irregular shape were risk factors for postoperative complications. 6. Follow-up and prognosis: the average follow-up time was 4.62 (+ 6.53 months) (2-20 months), the average follow-up time was 1.30 (+ 0.70 times) (1-4 times), no recurrence. Conclusion: 1. ESE, STER is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for MPTs. Methods: The operation time of STER was longer than that of ESE, but the visual field was clear and the complications of bleeding were lower. The gas-related complications in STER group were higher than that of ESE group, but all were slight, and disappeared after conservative treatment. It is recommended that ESE be performed. MPTs of cardia and STER have longer operation time than ESE, but the intraoperative complications are lower and there is no difference in postoperative complications. So MPTs of cardia are recommended to use STER. 3. EUS has better diagnostic effect on MPTs, especially for MPTs with irregular shape under ultrasound. 4. Research shows that MPTs are straightforward. Large diameter and irregular shape, STER operation and long operation time are the risk factors of postoperative complications.
【学位授予单位】:西南医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡红娜;宋莎莎;方海明;章礼久;;食管间叶源性肿瘤临床病理特点及内镜下切除方法评价[J];浙江临床医学;2016年05期
2 胡小三;徐辉;;内镜黏膜下剥离术出血的处理[J];川北医学院学报;2016年02期
3 谭玉勇;唐瑶;刘德良;;经黏膜下隧道内镜肿瘤切除术治疗消化道固有肌层肿瘤的现状[J];世界华人消化杂志;2016年11期
4 常琳琳;张开光;张明黎;宋继中;王业涛;王巧民;解丽;吴正祥;;上消化道黏膜下肿瘤的诊治和随访[J];世界华人消化杂志;2016年05期
5 Matheus Cavalcante Franco;Ricardo Teles Schulz;Fauze Maluf-Filho;;Opinion: How to manage subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract?[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2015年18期
6 吴爱荣;李锐;史冬涛;李岭;张德庆;王超;严苏;;超声内镜对上消化道黏膜下肿瘤的诊断价值[J];中华胃肠外科杂志;2015年11期
7 董海燕;王玉龙;李国栋;李杰;庞秋萍;贾欣永;;改良腹腔镜胃镜双镜联合手术治疗固有肌层来源胃间质瘤[J];中华消化外科杂志;2015年05期
8 De-Jun Zhou;Zhen-Bo Dai;Malcolm M Wells;Dan-Lei Yu;Jing Zhang;Lei Zhang;;Submucosal tunneling and endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors at the esophagogastric junction[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2015年02期
9 Andrzej Biaek;Anna Wiechowska-Kozowska;Jan Pertkiewicz;Katarzyna Karpińska;Wojciech Marlicz;Piotr Milkiewicz;Teresa Starzyńska;;Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of neoplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2013年12期
10 杨建民;费保莹;徐启顺;楼国春;张骏;厉彩红;施萍;;内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道肿瘤的疗效和安全性[J];中国内镜杂志;2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李宾;内镜切除技术在食管胃结合部固有肌层肿瘤中的应用[D];山东大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 黄益澄;内镜经黏膜下隧道肿瘤切除术治疗食管固有肌层肿瘤[D];山东大学;2012年
,本文编号:2245406
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2245406.html