当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

内镜下切除术在食管及贲门固有肌层肿瘤治疗中的应用

发布时间:2018-09-17 09:16
【摘要】:目的:评价内镜下切除术,包括内镜黏膜下挖除术(endoscopic submucosal excavation,ESE)和经黏膜下隧道内镜肿瘤切除术(submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection,STER),在食管和贲门固有肌层肿瘤(muscularis propria tumors,MPTs)治疗中的临床应用价值,并对比分析两者的安全性与有效性,分析患者术后出现并发症的危险因素。方法:收集2013年01月-2016年10月于成都军区总医院消化内镜中心行ESE及STER术患者资料,筛选出符合入选标准的病例53例,回顾性分析其临床及病理资料;其中接受ESE手术患者29例,STER手术患者24例。主要观察指标:手术时间、术中并发症、整块切除率、术后不良事件发生情况及复发情况。根据术后病理和病变部位行亚组分析。结果:1.本研究共纳入患者53例,男16例,女37例;平均年龄50.38±8.15岁,MPTs平均直径为20.13±13.56mm;按发生部位来分:食管43.4%(23/53),贲门56.6%(30/53);按术后病理来分:平滑肌瘤28.3%(15/53)、间质瘤67.9%(36/53)、其他(神经内分泌瘤、脂肪瘤等)3.8%(2/53)。2.超声内镜(endoscopic ultrasonography,EUS)对病变的判断:来源层次的总体符合率为100%;病变性质的符合率为62.3%(33/53),其中间质瘤的符合率为87.5%(21/24),平滑肌瘤的符合率为44.4%(12/27);EUS下表现为形状不规则的MPTs,我们将其诊断为间质瘤的准确率明显高于平滑肌瘤(χ~2=6.24,P=0.012)3.本研究53例患者的整块切除率为96.2%(51/53),两组在整块切除率方面无差异(STER 95.8%VS ESE 96.6%,P0.05);STER组手术时间明显长于ESE组(140.46±73.48min VS 60.03±51.29min,P0.05);术中总的并发症发生率11.3%(6/53),均发生于贲门部,其中术中明显出血发生率为9.4%(5/53),术中穿孔发生率为1.9%(1/53),STER组术中并发症低于ESE组(4.2%VS 17.2%,P0.05);术后总的并发症发生率22.6%(12/53)(有4例患者同时并发了两种术后并发症),其中感染发生率为11.3%(6/53),气体相关性并发症11.3%(6/53),少量胸腔积液5.7%(3/53),迟发性出血1.9%(1/53);术后总的并发症STER组明显高于ESE组(37.5%VS 10.3%,P0.05),特别是术后气体相关性并发症(25.0%VS 0,P0.05);两组在术后平均住院天数及禁食天数方面无明显差异。4.食管的MPTs,ESE与STER相比:手术时间短(43.42±17.89min VS156.27±69.23min,P0.001)、钛夹使用少(1.58±2.87 VS 7.45±1.29,P0.001)、术后并发症发生率低(0 VS 45.5%,P=0.014)且术中并发症无差异。贲门的MPTs,STER与ESE相比手术时间较长(127.08±77.01min VS71.76±63.50min,P0.001),但术中并发症较低(7.7%VS 29.4%,P=0.196),且术后并发症无差异。5.结合单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归模型分析,本研究表明MPTs直径大、形状不规则、采用STER术、手术时间长是术后并发症发生的危险因素。6.随访及预后:平均随访时间4.62±6.53月(2-20月)、平均随访次数1.30±0.70次(1-4次),无一例复发。结论:1.ESE、STER是MPTs安全有效的微创治疗方法;STER手术时间长于ESE,但术中视野清晰、术中出血并发症发生低;STER手术组气体相关性并发症高于ESE组,但均比较轻微,经保守治疗后消失。2.食管的MPTs,ESE与STER相比手术时间短、钛夹使用少、术后并发症发生率低且术中并发症无差异,故推荐行ESE术。贲门的MPTs,STER与ESE相比手术时间长,但术中并发症较低且术后并发症无差异,故贲门部的MPTs推荐行STER术。3.EUS对MPTs有较好的诊断作用,特别是超声下表现为形状不规则的MPTs诊断为间质瘤的准确性较高。4.研究表明MPTs直径大、形状不规则、采用STER术、手术时间长是术后并发症发生的危险因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) in the treatment of esophageal and cardiac muscular propria tumors (MPTs). Methods: The clinical and pathological data of 53 patients who underwent ESE and STER in the center of digestive endoscopy of Chengdu Military Region General Hospital from January 2013 to October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Main outcome measures: operative time, intraoperative complications, total resection rate, occurrence and recurrence of adverse events after operation. Subgroup analysis was performed according to postoperative pathology and lesion site. Results: 1. 53 patients, 16 males and 37 females, with an average age of 50.38 (+ 8.15 years), were included in this study. MPTs were 20. 13 [13.56 mm], 43.4% (23/53) of the esophagus and 56.6% (30/53) of the cardia, 28.3% (15/53) of leiomyomas, 67.9% (36/53) of stromal tumors, and 3.8% (2/53) of other tumors (neuroendocrine tumors, lipomas, etc.). 2. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed that the overall coincidence rate at the source level was 100%; The coincidence rate of degeneration was 62.3% (33/53), including 87.5% (21/24) of stromal tumors and 44.4% (12/27) of leiomyomas, and the accuracy of diagnosing stromal tumors (_~2 = 6.24, P = 0.012) was significantly higher in patients with EUS with irregular shape MPTS than that of leiomyomas (_~2 = 6.24, P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the total resection rate between the two groups (STER 95.8% VS ESE 96.6%, P 0.05); the operation time in STER group was significantly longer than that in ESE group (140.46 65507 The intraoperative complications in ER group were lower than those in ESE group (4.2% VS 17.2%, P 0.05); the total postoperative complications rate was 22.6% (12/53) (4 patients had two postoperative complications simultaneously), including infection rate 11.3% (6/53), gas-related complications 11.3% (6/53), small amount of pleural effusion 5.7% (3/53), delayed hemorrhage 1.9% (1/53); Esophageal MPTS and ESE were significantly shorter than STER (43.42 17.89 6550 Compared with ESE, MPTs and STER had longer operation time (127.08 VS 71.76 Regression model analysis showed that MPTs with large diameter and irregular shape were risk factors for postoperative complications. 6. Follow-up and prognosis: the average follow-up time was 4.62 (+ 6.53 months) (2-20 months), the average follow-up time was 1.30 (+ 0.70 times) (1-4 times), no recurrence. Conclusion: 1. ESE, STER is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for MPTs. Methods: The operation time of STER was longer than that of ESE, but the visual field was clear and the complications of bleeding were lower. The gas-related complications in STER group were higher than that of ESE group, but all were slight, and disappeared after conservative treatment. It is recommended that ESE be performed. MPTs of cardia and STER have longer operation time than ESE, but the intraoperative complications are lower and there is no difference in postoperative complications. So MPTs of cardia are recommended to use STER. 3. EUS has better diagnostic effect on MPTs, especially for MPTs with irregular shape under ultrasound. 4. Research shows that MPTs are straightforward. Large diameter and irregular shape, STER operation and long operation time are the risk factors of postoperative complications.
【学位授予单位】:西南医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡红娜;宋莎莎;方海明;章礼久;;食管间叶源性肿瘤临床病理特点及内镜下切除方法评价[J];浙江临床医学;2016年05期

2 胡小三;徐辉;;内镜黏膜下剥离术出血的处理[J];川北医学院学报;2016年02期

3 谭玉勇;唐瑶;刘德良;;经黏膜下隧道内镜肿瘤切除术治疗消化道固有肌层肿瘤的现状[J];世界华人消化杂志;2016年11期

4 常琳琳;张开光;张明黎;宋继中;王业涛;王巧民;解丽;吴正祥;;上消化道黏膜下肿瘤的诊治和随访[J];世界华人消化杂志;2016年05期

5 Matheus Cavalcante Franco;Ricardo Teles Schulz;Fauze Maluf-Filho;;Opinion: How to manage subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract?[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2015年18期

6 吴爱荣;李锐;史冬涛;李岭;张德庆;王超;严苏;;超声内镜对上消化道黏膜下肿瘤的诊断价值[J];中华胃肠外科杂志;2015年11期

7 董海燕;王玉龙;李国栋;李杰;庞秋萍;贾欣永;;改良腹腔镜胃镜双镜联合手术治疗固有肌层来源胃间质瘤[J];中华消化外科杂志;2015年05期

8 De-Jun Zhou;Zhen-Bo Dai;Malcolm M Wells;Dan-Lei Yu;Jing Zhang;Lei Zhang;;Submucosal tunneling and endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors at the esophagogastric junction[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2015年02期

9 Andrzej Biaek;Anna Wiechowska-Kozowska;Jan Pertkiewicz;Katarzyna Karpińska;Wojciech Marlicz;Piotr Milkiewicz;Teresa Starzyńska;;Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of neoplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2013年12期

10 杨建民;费保莹;徐启顺;楼国春;张骏;厉彩红;施萍;;内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道肿瘤的疗效和安全性[J];中国内镜杂志;2013年03期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 李宾;内镜切除技术在食管胃结合部固有肌层肿瘤中的应用[D];山东大学;2015年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 黄益澄;内镜经黏膜下隧道肿瘤切除术治疗食管固有肌层肿瘤[D];山东大学;2012年



本文编号:2245406

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2245406.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户45241***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com