当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

全身炎症反应相关指标预测食管癌放疗患者预后的研究

发布时间:2018-11-21 12:16
【摘要】:背景与目的:目前已有多项研究证实食管癌患者术前全身炎性反应相关指标,如粒淋比(NLR)、血淋比(PLR)、淋单比(LMR),能够预测术后食管癌患者预后。然而,NLR、PLR、LMR与接受放疗的食管癌患者的预后关系则未见报道。本研究目的是探讨全身炎性反应相关指标在食管癌放疗患者预后预测中的临床价值。资料与方法:回顾性分析2009年至2014年在山东大学齐鲁医院接受放射治疗的食管癌患者。收集其基线临床特征、放疗前1周内血液分析报告以及CT报告。粒淋比(NLR)的计算方式为食管癌患者的周围血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数的绝对值之比。以此类推,血淋比(PLR)是血小板与淋巴细胞计数的绝对值之比,淋单比(LMR)的计算公式是食管癌放疗患者放疗前的周围血淋巴细胞及单核细胞计数的绝对值之比。以NLR=2为界,PLR=150为界,LMR=3.57为界,将资料分为两组进行分析。运用卡方检验分析NLR、PLR、LMR与患者基线临床特征的关系。对于NLR、PLR、LMR与患者无进展生存期(PFS)的分析,我们采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并利用Log-rank检验比较差异。采用Cox比例风险模型对相关变量进行单因素分析。本研究中数据均采用SPSS23软件进行统计学分析,p0.05结果有统计学差异。结果:本研究共纳入86例患者,其中男性患者75例,女性患者11例。中位年龄63岁。中位随访时间11个月(1-68月)。中位无进展生存11个月。卡方检验显示NLR两组患者间基线临床特征均未见统计学差异;PLR两组患者间年龄上存在明显差异(p=0.005);LMR两组患者性别因素存在明显差异(p=0.036)。高NLR组中位PFS为10月,低NLR组中位PFS为12月(log-rank p=0.048)。高PLR组中位PFS为10月,低PLR组中位PFS为14.5月(log-rank p0.05)。高LMR 组中位 PFS 为 10 月,低 LMR 组中位PFS 为 11 月(log-rank p0.05)。Cox比例风险风险模型结果显示粒淋比组、血淋比组、淋单比组风险比(HR)分别为 0.56,0.65 和 1.15。结论:血淋比和淋单比不能预测接受放疗的食管癌患者PFS。放疗前粒淋比较高的食管癌患者比粒淋比较低的患者PFS短。放疗前粒淋比一定程度上可预测接受放疗的食管癌患者的预后,但这种预测效力并不强。
[Abstract]:Background & objective: several studies have confirmed that preoperative systemic inflammatory response in patients with esophageal cancer, such as granulocyte lymphocyte ratio (NLR), blood lymphocyte ratio (PLR),) to single lymphocyte ratio (LMR), can predict the prognosis of postoperative esophageal cancer patients. However, the relationship between NLR,PLR,LMR and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with esophageal cancer after radiotherapy. Materials and methods: esophageal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy from 2009 to 2014 in Qilu Hospital Shandong University were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline clinical features, blood analysis report and CT report within 1 week before radiotherapy were collected. The granulocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated as the absolute ratio of peripheral blood neutrophils to lymphocyte counts in patients with esophageal cancer. By analogy, (PLR) is the absolute ratio of platelet to lymphocyte count, and the (LMR) formula is the absolute ratio of peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes before radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Taking NLR=2 as the boundary, PLR=150 as the boundary, and LMR=3.57 as the boundary, the data were divided into two groups for analysis. Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between NLR,PLR,LMR and baseline clinical features. For the analysis of NLR,PLR,LMR and (PFS), Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curve, and Log-rank test was used to compare the difference. The Cox proportional risk model is used to analyze the related variables. In this study, the data were analyzed by SPSS23 software, p0.05 results were statistically different. Results: a total of 86 patients were included in this study, including 75 male and 11 female. The median age was 63 years. The median follow-up time was 11 months (1-68 months). Median no progress survival for 11 months. Chi square test showed that there was no statistical difference in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups of NLR, and there was a significant difference in age between the two groups of PLR (p0. 005); LMR and 2 groups) (p0. 036). The median PFS of high NLR group was 10 months and that of low NLR group was 12 months (log-rank p0. 048). The median PFS of high PLR group was 10 months, while that of low PLR group was 14. 5 months (log-rank p 0. 05). The median PFS was 10 months in the high LMR group, and the median PFS was 11 months in the low LMR group (log-rank p0.05). Cox proportional risk model). The results showed that the (HR) of the granulocyte ratio group, the blood lymphocyte ratio group and the single lymphocyte ratio group were 0.560.65 and 1.15, respectively. Conclusion: hemolymph ratio and lymphocytic ratio can not predict PFS. in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy. PFS was shorter in esophageal cancer patients with higher granulocyte levels before radiotherapy than in patients with lower granulocyte lymphocytic levels. The granulocyte ratio can predict the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients who received radiotherapy to some extent, but this predictive effect is not strong.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沈冶中,施险峰;食管癌放疗合并化疗与单纯放疗的疗效比较[J];安徽医学;2000年04期

2 白光平;51例凶型食管癌放疗分析[J];中国厂矿医学;2000年02期

3 程远方,刘建华,王江波,魏汉涛;食管癌放疗后复发再手术63例报告[J];山东医药;2004年30期

4 严爱武;;食管癌放疗患者的饮食护理[J];中国实用护理杂志;2006年33期

5 濮娟;王成师;徐欣;;食管癌放疗后复发再放疗75例[J];山东医药;2011年28期

6 万志龙,马煌如,钱瑞熙,邬荣彬,蔡晶;中段食管癌放疗中食管移位及纠正照射角度的临床意义[J];中国放射肿瘤学;1987年01期

7 李爱英,赵炳芬,陈素云,刘正华;食管癌放疗病人的饮食护理体会[J];当代肿瘤学杂志;1994年04期

8 庄志伟,李德锐,陈志坚,洪泓,林志雄,,李东升,周明镇;食管癌放疗中并发穿孔10例分析[J];癌症;1995年01期

9 陆幼琴,蔡晶;95例食管癌放疗合并化疗的疗效分析[J];中华放射肿瘤学杂志;1995年01期

10 刘登湘,吕登平;食管癌放疗22年后局部复发一例[J];中华放射肿瘤学杂志;1996年03期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 元芳迎;周梅琳;;食管癌放疗患者健康教育需求调查[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2009年

2 李杰;王菁;郭丹;王静怡;杜文静;;食管癌放疗前后多种生物标记物联合检测的临床意义[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年

3 李文奇;汪文莉;宋洪欣;郭秋峰;乔玉斗;;食管癌放疗中大出血15例分析[A];中国民政康复医学第五届学术会议论文汇编[C];1999年

4 吴振宇;刘京;;食管癌放疗性狭窄支架置入术后的临床随访观察[A];全国非血管性与血管性介入新技术学术研讨大会(第二届介入放射学新技术提高班、第二届河南省肿瘤介入诊疗学术大会)论文汇编[C];2004年

5 李杰;杜文静;王菁;郭丹;王静怡;;食管癌放疗前后血清蛋白指纹图谱特征性变化的初步研究[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年

6 高红梅;时高峰;刘辉;许茜;李如迅;王琦;;磁共振扩散成像技术对食管癌放疗后疗效评价的动态研究[A];第四届中国肿瘤学术大会暨第五届海峡两岸肿瘤学术会议论文集[C];2006年

7 张玉丽;朱姣;于博文;;食管癌放疗反应与并发症的观察与护理[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理新进展研讨会论文汇编[C];2012年

8 林贵山;陈锦华;程惠华;傅志超;;血红蛋白水平影响食管癌放疗疗效的前瞻性研究[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年

9 戴明明;瞿跃进;邓

本文编号:2346941


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2346941.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5bad7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com