多发性骨髓瘤髓外病变患者MYC激活的预后意义及其分子机制探讨
[Abstract]:Background and Objective Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant blood system tumor, and extramedullary disease (EMD) is one of its manifestations, often indicating poor prognosis. The prognosis of EMD patients is very heterogeneous, and its pathogenesis and risk factors are not clear, and the cytogenetic abnormality is the hot spot of the present study. MYC is an important proto-oncogene, and gene rearrangement is common in highly invasive tumors. In recent years, it has been found that its abnormality is related to the progression of MM disease, and can be activated by the genes such as Muco1, Pyk2, etc., but the significance of MYC in the prognosis of EMD and MM is still short of mass report. The main purpose of this study was to study the relationship between the level of MYC and the level of protein expression and EMD, and to explore its prognostic significance in MM. (2) The cytogenetic abnormality of the patients with EMD and isolated plasma cell tumor (SP) was compared, and the role of plasma cell clone evolution in the generation of EMD was discussed. (3) The possible mechanism of MYC activation in extramedullary disease was investigated by using myeloma cell line to study the effect of Py2 and Muc1 on MYC in vitro. Methods The patients who were first diagnosed between January 2008 and November 2015 were included in the study. Myc, Muc1 and Py2 protein expression in the bone marrow specimens were studied by means of a case-control analysis method in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and non-extramedullary disease (nonEMD) and in situ hybridization (FISH). The pathological specimens of the extramedullary plasmacytoma of the EMD patients were selected as control and the isolated plasma cell tumor specimens (SP) diagnosed by the pathology department of Peking Union and the hospital were used as control and the FISH method was used to study the MYC abnormality, 1q21 amplification, 8p21 deletion, RB1 deletion, D13S319 deletion, P53 deletion, IGH rearrangement and IHC method to study Myc. Muc1, Py2 protein expression. The effects of Myc inhibitor, Py2 inhibitor and bortezomib on cell proliferation, apoptosis and invasiveness were investigated in vitro using the MM cell line U266, the RPMI8226 and the plasma cell leukemia (PCL) cell line NCI-H929. Results 1. MYC rearrangement and the expression of Myc, Muc1 and Py2 were detected in 65 nonEMD patients and 42 patients with EMD. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (not up to vs24, p = 0.021). The incidence of MYC rearrangement in nonEMD and EMD groups was 20.0% and 33.3% (p = 0.121), respectively. The incidence of MYC rearrangements (42.3%) (p = 0.029), MYC rearrangement, and 1 q21 amplification of double-positive in nonEMD and EMD groups was 6.2% and 23.8% (p = 0.025), respectively. The median survival time of MYC rearrangement was 15.4 months. The median survival of the MYC rearrangement negative was not reached (p0.001). The simple 1q21 amplification or 8p21 deletion did not significantly reduce the survival of the patient, but the median survival of the MYC rearrangement combined with the 1q21 amplification or the 8p21 deletion was significantly shortened, respectively (p = 0.001) and 11.0 months (p = 0.010). The multi-factor analysis found that MYC rearrangement was an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of MM (p0.001). The results showed that the high expression of Myc in bone marrow of newly diagnosed MM patients was 15.7% and 48.2% (p0.001) in nonEMD and EMD, 16.3% and 35.2% (p = 0.030) in non-EMD and EMD groups, respectively. The expression of Myc in the high-expression group of the Muc1 was significantly higher (34.2% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.010), and the expression of Myc in the high-expression group of Py2 was significantly higher (29.6% vs18.0, p = 0.011). Myc protein expression and gene abnormality did not match completely. 32 cases of EMD and 14 cases of SP plasmacytoma were detected by FISH, MYC rearrangement in EMD (46.7% vs14.3%, p = 0.038), 1q21 amplification (65.5% vs14.3%, p = 0.002), 8p21 deletion (37.9% vs0%, p = 0.008), RBI deletion (65.5% vs14.3%, p = 0.001), D13S319 (58.6% vs23.4%, p = 0.022), P53 deletion (37.9% vs0%, p = 0.008), IGH rearrangement (48.3% vs. 7.1%, The p = 0.015) incidence was significantly higher in the SP group. In most of the EMD patients, there were new cytogenetic abnormalities in plasma cells compared to the bone marrow tissue. The high expression rate of Myc protein was higher in the EMD group than in the SP group (43.3% vsl6.7%), but there was no significant difference (P = 0.103). One case of a MYC-positive SP group eventually progressed to active myeloma within two years. Inhibiting Myc can reduce the invasion ability of MM cells, and inhibit Pyk2 to lower the expression level of the cell Myc and reduce the cell invasion ability. Conclusion The prognosis of EMD is poor, but the outcome is very heterogeneous. The high incidence of MYC rearrangement in patients with EMD is an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of MM. The incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities was significantly higher in the EMD than in the SP, and more cytogenetic abnormalities were found in the extramedullary lesions. Myc expression is associated with cell invasiveness, and Muc1 and Pyk2 may cause poor prognosis by activating Myc.
【学位授予单位】:北京协和医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R733.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁亚文,邱玉健,周家善;多发性骨髓瘤误诊1例[J];山东医药;2000年23期
2 陈燕,王燕婷,欧阳仁荣;未分泌型多发性骨髓瘤二例[J];上海医学;2000年02期
3 贾有荣,方忠梅,刘伟;刻舟求剑顾旧病 景过时迁漏新疾──1例多发性骨髓瘤误诊的经过[J];新医学;2000年03期
4 王炜琴,卢兴国,朱彪;多发性骨髓瘤患者的丙型肝炎病毒感染[J];中华血液学杂志;2000年05期
5 侯健;加强对多发性骨髓瘤的研究[J];中华血液学杂志;2000年11期
6 余润泉;多发性骨髓瘤治疗进展[J];中华血液学杂志;2000年11期
7 刘以淑,肖文义;12例多发性骨髓瘤误诊分析[J];重庆医学;2000年02期
8 何建明;以癫痫首发的多发性骨髓瘤一例报告[J];华夏医学;2000年01期
9 潘海波;多发性骨髓瘤非典型表现误诊19例分析[J];广西医科大学学报;2000年05期
10 孙可;多发性骨髓瘤误诊分析(附13例报告)[J];广西医学;2000年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李利红;冷芸;刘晋玮;陈文明;;多发性骨髓瘤高凝机制的研究[A];第12届全国实验血液学会议论文摘要[C];2009年
2 汪萍;沈立松;;B淋巴细胞刺激物与多发性骨髓瘤[A];全国临床免疫检验研讨会暨第六届全国临床免疫学术会议论文汇编[C];2009年
3 陈文明;;多发性骨髓瘤的诊断与治疗[A];全国中西医结合血液学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 郭宇;;多发性骨髓瘤15例延误诊断原因分析[A];第十一届山西省血液病学术年会暨国家级及山西省继续医学教育学习班资料汇编[C];2010年
5 陆海波;白玉贤;吴瑾;周建华;;25例多发性骨髓瘤的诊治分析[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年
6 孙延霞;张凤春;卢振霞;孙步彤;林玉梅;;白介素6在多发性骨髓瘤患者中的表达与临床[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年
7 陈文明;翟玉华;张鹏;宿丽;;多发性骨髓瘤白介素-6和血管内皮细胞生长因子的检测及意义[A];第九届全国实验血液学会议论文摘要汇编[C];2003年
8 陈文明;翟玉华;张鹏;宿丽;;多发性骨髓瘤白介素-6和血管内皮细胞生长因子的检测及意义[A];第三届全国血液免疫学学术大会论文集[C];2003年
9 郑立;;59例多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析[A];中华医学会第八次全国血液学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
10 ;多发性骨髓瘤和并发症处理[A];2005年华东六省一市血液病学学术会议暨浙江省血液病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 李颖;我国发布首个多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南[N];科技日报;2008年
2 王建新;对多发性骨髓瘤治疗要有信心[N];中国消费者报;2008年
3 河南省肿瘤研究所 程心超;识别多发性骨髓瘤[N];健康报;2010年
4 天津市肿瘤医院血液科主任 张翼澾 李运红 胡颜 整理;多发性骨髓瘤 发病静悄悄[N];健康报;2011年
5 北京朝阳医院京西院区血液与肿瘤科主任医师 黄仲夏;多发性骨髓瘤易误诊[N];健康报;2013年
6 马飞;抗多发性骨髓瘤新药研发踏上新征途[N];医药经济报;2013年
7 记者 冯卫东;多发性骨髓瘤复发机理揭开[N];科技日报;2013年
8 陈文明邋冯静;多发性骨髓瘤 把握治疗时机[N];健康报;2007年
9 李颖;万珂为多发性骨髓瘤带来希望[N];科技日报;2007年
10 徐述湘;多发性骨髓瘤治疗进入新阶段[N];中国医药报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 邓书会;多发性骨髓瘤伴髓外病变临床研究[D];北京协和医学院;2014年
2 王栋;PAX5通过结合RIP2调控多发性骨髓瘤细胞NF-κB信号通路[D];中国科学技术大学;2013年
3 刘增艳;miR-186抑制多发性骨髓瘤细胞增殖的作用及机制研究[D];山东大学;2016年
4 于晓晨;多发性骨髓瘤髓外病变患者MYC激活的预后意义及其分子机制探讨[D];北京协和医学院;2016年
5 范宇;ZNF545在多发性骨髓瘤、宫颈癌和食管癌中的表观调控及其抑制肿瘤细胞生长的机制研究[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
6 魏华萍;嵌合抗原受体修饰的NK细胞在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2016年
7 韩晓雁;多发性骨髓瘤化疗相关性周围神经病变的防治策略及其相关细胞因子的研究[D];浙江大学;2016年
8 吴洪坤;miR-145-3p靶向HDAC4调控多发性骨髓瘤细胞凋亡与自噬的作用及机制研究[D];第二军医大学;2016年
9 杨龙江;血小板因子4及其17-70肽段在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用及机制研究[D];第二军医大学;2010年
10 王雅丹;脑源性神经营养因子在多发性骨髓瘤血管新生中的作用及机制研究[D];华中科技大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 余庆峰;神经钙粘素在多发性骨髓瘤患者骨髓瘤细胞中的表达及临床意义[D];郑州大学;2015年
2 程莹;淋巴细胞绝对数在初诊多发性骨髓瘤中的临床意义[D];宁夏医科大学;2015年
3 张李玉;多发性骨髓瘤患者骨髓单个核细胞CT7表达与临床相关性研究[D];东南大学;2015年
4 贾雪;以50岁为界多发性骨髓瘤患者临床特征对比分析[D];遵义医学院;2016年
5 靳重阳;多发性骨髓瘤细胞遗传学临床研究[D];山西医科大学;2016年
6 李诗雅;65例多发性骨髓瘤患者免疫表型特点及预后因素分析[D];山西医科大学;2016年
7 马a花;硼替佐米联合化疗对初治多发性骨髓瘤患者DC亚群、IL-6、TNF-α的影响及与β2-MG的相关性研究[D];兰州大学;2016年
8 邢恋;调节性T细胞、T淋巴细胞亚群及IL-17、IL-23在多发性骨髓瘤中的意义[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
9 王强生;血清铁调素的测定在多发性骨髓瘤中的临床意义[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
10 孙磊;多发性骨髓瘤患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与预后的关系[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
,本文编号:2494655
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2494655.html