穴位埋线对血管性痴呆模型大鼠学习记忆及海马SOD、MDA的影响
本文关键词:穴位埋线对血管性痴呆模型大鼠学习记忆及海马SOD、MDA的影响 出处:《黑龙江中医药大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
更多相关文章: 血管性痴呆 学习记忆能力 穴位埋线疗法 SOD MDA
【摘要】:目的:观察百会、肾俞穴位埋线对血管性痴呆模型大鼠学习记忆、神经细胞及海马SOD、MDA的影响,探索百会、肾俞穴位埋线是否有脑神经保护作用及抗氧化作用,为血管性痴呆治疗提供新的依据。方法:造模前行水迷宫实验排除特异性大鼠,随机假手术组10只,以经改良的 Pulsinelli' s4 血管阻断法(four-vesselocclusion,4-VO)建立 VD 大鼠模型[1]后随机数表法分为VD模型组、穴位埋线组、针刺组。埋线组取穴:肾俞(双)、百会,每隔7天埋线1次,共埋2次;针刺组:治疗之日起每日上午8时到12时之间进行针刺,百会,神庭穴向后斜刺,大椎,足三里,直刺平补平泻手法捻转1分钟,后留针20分钟,针刺每日一次,共针刺16天。模型组:造模成功后除常规饲养每日消毒观察大鼠日常行为外不予任何治疗处理。假手术组:麻醉后,行背侧颈正中切口,不进行椎动脉烧灼,再行腹侧颈正中切口,分离双侧颈总动脉,穿线备用,但不进行颈总动脉夹闭,24小时候缝合切口。治疗期间常规饲养每日消毒观察大鼠日常行为外不予任何治疗处理。以上动物均在造模后、治疗结束后行Morris水迷宫检测各组大鼠学习记忆能力,水迷宫试验后随机抽取各组中大鼠处死取含海马的脑组织检测细胞凋亡情况及SOD,MDA。结果;经水迷宫实验检测VD模型组表现出明显的学习记忆障碍,SOD活性下降,MDA含量上升,与假手术组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.01);埋线组与针刺组两组与模型组相比治疗后SOD活性均有所上升,MDA含量均有所下降,且寻找跳台次数明显增多,潜伏期缩短,但埋线组优于针刺组。各组抽取的大鼠脑切片做HE染色,光学显微镜下辨识海马锥体细胞变化。发现假手术组锥体细胞排行紧凑,整体构架规整,核清晰可见并深染。模型组则呈弥散空泡样变大,核仁缩小。埋线组和针刺组细胞空泡弥散较模型组少,细胞构架较清楚,核仁也可见。结论:百会、肾俞穴位埋线可以改善大鼠的学习记忆能力,提高大鼠大脑SOD活性,降低MDA含量,对大鼠脑组织损伤具有明显的保护作用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the effects of catgut embedding at Baihui and Shenshu points on learning and memory, nerve cells and MDA in hippocampus of rats with vascular dementia. Whether the Shenshu acupoint catgut embedding has the brain nerve protection and the antioxidation function, provides the new basis for the vascular dementia treatment. Methods: the water maze experiment before making the model excludes the specific rats, 10 rats in the random sham-operation group. Establishment of VD rat model by modified four-vessel inclusion 4-VO4 vessel occlusion method. [(1) the later random number table method was divided into VD model group, acupoint embedding group and acupuncture group. The acupoints in the catgut embedding group were collected: Shenshu (Shuangli, Baihui, once every 7 days), buried twice; Acupuncture group: daily acupuncture between 8:00 and 12:00 every day from the day of treatment, Baihui, Shenting point backward oblique prick, Dazhui, Zusanli, straight prick Pingbu Pingxiao technique twirled for 1 minute, then kept needle for 20 minutes. Acupuncture once a day for 16 days. Model group: after the model was successfully made, there was no treatment except routine feeding and daily disinfection to observe the daily behavior of the rats. The sham operation group: after anesthesia, the dorsal cervical median incision was performed. No cauterization of vertebral artery, ventral median cervical incision, separation of bilateral common carotid artery, puncture line reserve, but no common carotid artery occlusion. 24 hours suture incision. During the treatment period, routine feeding, disinfection and observation of the daily behavior of the rats were not treated with any treatment. All the above animals were treated after the establishment of the model. After the treatment, the learning and memory ability of the rats in each group was measured by Morris water maze. After the water maze test, the rats in each group were randomly selected and killed to detect apoptosis and SOD in the hippocampus. MDA. results; In VD model group, the activity of SOD decreased and the content of MDA increased by water labyrinth test. The difference was statistically significant compared with that of sham operation group (P 0.01). Compared with the model group, the activity of SOD in the catgut embedding group and acupuncture group decreased, and the frequency of searching for the platform increased and the incubation period was shortened. But the embedding group was superior to the acupuncture group. The brain slices of each group were stained by HE and the changes of hippocampal pyramidal cells were identified under optical microscope. The results showed that the pyramidal cells in the sham operation group were compact and the whole structure was regular. The nuclei were clearly visible and deeply stained. The model group showed diffuse vacuoles and reduced nucleoli. The number of vacuoles in the embedding group and acupuncture group was less than that in the model group. The cell structure was clear and the nucleolus was also visible in the model group. Conclusion: Baihui can be seen. The catgut embedding at Shenshu acupoint can improve the learning and memory ability of rats, increase the activity of SOD and decrease the content of MDA in the brain of rats. It has obvious protective effect on brain tissue injury in rats.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R245;R-332
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏素红;杨建宇;李彦知;史金花;戴淑琴;;关于微创穴位埋线技术规范的思考[J];中国医药指南;2007年S1期
2 张幼慈;;中医穴位埋线减肥324例疗效分析[J];中外医疗;2008年36期
3 左芳;楼婷;;穴位埋线的临床应用状况和发展趋势研究[J];中华中医药学刊;2009年05期
4 黄洪波;李东;;穴位埋线临床与基础研究概况[J];河北中医;2010年05期
5 李玉敏;张晓杰;;穴位埋线法治疗痤疮的临床研究进展[J];甘肃中医学院学报;2010年05期
6 黄健;毛胜富;;穴位埋线抑制生殖器疱疹复发疗效观察[J];中国针灸;2010年10期
7 雷景和;;无创穴位埋线减肥疗法的临床应用[J];甘肃医药;2011年03期
8 刘进;;穴位埋线减肥52例疗效观察[J];中医临床研究;2013年01期
9 顾亚娇;赵文霞;;穴位埋线对非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者血脂影响观察40例[J];中国中医药现代远程教育;2013年19期
10 陆健;葛堂;赵敬阳;;穴位埋线麻醉试验过程和首例成功的汇报[J];天津医药;1976年09期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 刘颖;;穴位埋线法在中医外科中的应用[A];2008年中医外科学术年会论文集[C];2008年
2 任晓艳;;穴位埋线拓展及临床应用[A];农村中医药适宜技术交流及推广研讨会论文集[C];2006年
3 张幼慈;;中医穴位埋线减肥324例疗效分析[A];第二十四届航天医学年会暨第七届航天护理年会论文汇编[C];2008年
4 黄宁霞;钟彦;;穴位埋线对预防化疗呕吐的疗效观察[A];中华中医药学会第八次外治学术会议论文集[C];2012年
5 刘晓琴;温转;;浅谈穴位埋线后不同疾病出现的典型反应[A];全国针灸临床适宜技术推广研讨会暨甘肃省针灸学会2013年学术年会论文集[C];2013年
6 雷景和;;无创穴位埋线减肥疗法的临床应用[A];甘肃省中医药学会2010年会员代表大会暨学术年会论文汇编[C];2010年
7 张中成;骆悠;;电针结合穴位埋线对代谢综合征患者胰岛素抵抗的影响[A];广东省针灸学会第十一次学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2010年
8 任晓艳;徐松波;;穴位埋线减肥法治疗肥胖症1260例疗效观察[A];中国针灸学会第六届全国中青年针灸推拿学术交流暨针灸学科发展与建设研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
9 张理梅;;穴位埋线在损美性皮肤病中的应用[A];浙江省中医药学会2005年外科、耳鼻喉科学术交流会资料汇编[C];2005年
10 姚军;陈炜;;穴位埋线瘦身及减肥174例[A];全国第16届针灸临床学术研讨会、全国第11届耳穴诊治学术研讨会、当代临床治验论坛暨中西部十省区学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 天津中医药大学第一附属医院主治医师 尹丽丽;穴位埋线进展多[N];健康报;2007年
2 邢郦阳;穴位埋线治肥胖[N];家庭医生报;2008年
3 中南大学湘雅二医院针灸科 雷毅军 吴杞;穴位埋线可减肥[N];家庭医生报;2004年
4 ;穴位埋线治癫痫[N];中国中医药报;2009年
5 yび板逭步,
本文编号:1402656
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/1402656.html