血压晨峰的中医证型特点与相关危险因素的临床研究
本文选题:血压晨峰 切入点:24h动态血压监测 出处:《广州中医药大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:通过采集血压晨峰患者的相关数据,探讨血压晨峰患者的中医证型分布情况及其与年龄、血压级别、病程、血脂、尿微量白蛋白、颈动脉内膜中层厚度情况、血尿酸等相关危险因素的关系。方法:采纳2015年7月至2016年5月入住广东省中医院心血管科并确诊为高血压病的患者,行24h动态血压监测筛查出血压晨峰患者并完善其余各项检查,采集相关数据后利用SPSS统计软件进行分析,得出结果,探讨血压晨峰患者的中医证型分布情况及其与年龄、血压级别、病程、血脂、尿微量白蛋白、颈动脉内膜中层厚度情况、血尿酸等相关危险因素的关系。结果:(1)课题共纳入110例患者。按中医证候分组,肝火亢盛证26例,占23.6%,平均MBPS值37.54±1.58mmHg;阴虚阳亢证18例,占16.5%,平均MBPS值36.79±1.03mmHg;阴阳两虚证23例,占23.9%,平均MBPS值36.99±0.96mmHg。痰湿壅盛证43例,占39.1%,平均MBPS值38.88±2.64mmHg。经单因素方差分析比较,P0.05,差异显著。(2)按血压级别分组,高血压1级患者8例,占7.3%,平均MBPS值36.23±0.79mmHg;高血压2级患者24例,占21.8%,平均MBPS值37.34±2.27mmHg;高血压3级患者78例,占70.9%,平均MBPS值38.15±2.09mmHg,经单因素方差分析显示,P0.05,层级差异显著。(3)按年龄分组,55岁及以下血压晨峰患者18例,占16.4%,平均MBPS值37.17±1.31mmHg;56~65岁血压晨峰患者36例,占32.7%,平均MBPS值37.59±2.30mmHg;66-75岁血压晨峰患者22例,占20.0%,平均MBPS值38.16±2.93mmHg;76~85岁血压晨峰患者34例,占30.9%,平均MBPS值38.17±1.35mmHg。经方差分析比较,P0.05,无明显统计学差异。(4)按高血压病程分组,病程小于10年者61例,占55.5%,平均MBPS值37.37±1.88mmHg;病程介于10~20年者24例,占21.8%,平均MBPS值38.05±1.51mmHg;病程大于20年者25例,占22.7%,平均MBPS值 38.74±2.74mmHg。方差分析显示,P0.05,差异显著。(5)按IMT增厚情况分组,双侧IMT未增厚者20例,平均MBPS者36.96±2.34mmHg;单侧IMT增厚者17例,平均MBPS36.92±1.22mmHg;双侧IMT均增厚者64例,平均MBPS值38.40±2.12mmHg。方差分析显示,P0.05,差异显著。(6)按24h节律分组,24h节律存在者18例,平均MBPS值37.58±2.45mmHg;24h节律消失或倒置者83例,平均MBPS值37.96±2.05mmHg;经t检验,P0.05。(7)按AASI分组,AASI小于0.55者64例,平均MBPS值37.83±1.89mmHg;AASI大于等于0.55者39例,平均MBPS值37.92±2.49mmHg。经比较,P0.05。(8)按TCD血流情况分组,TCD正常者30例,平均MBPS值36.95±1.46mmHg;TCD血流异常者65例,平均MBPS值38.24±2.12mmHg。经比较,二组P0.05。(9)按尿微量白蛋白分组,尿微量白蛋白升高组19例,平均MBPS值39.48±3.02mmHg;正常组42例,平均MBPS值37.14±1.35mmHg。经比较,P0.05。(10)按血尿酸分组,尿酸正常者59例,平均MBPS值37.33±1.10mmHg;尿酸升高者36例,平均MBPS值37.43±1.25mmHg,经比较,P0.05。(11)血脂方面,TC正常者65例,平均MBPS值37.52±1.54mmHg,TC升高者36例,平均MBPS值38.084±2.86mHg,t检验显示P<0.05.NOn-HDL-C正常者67例,平均MBPS值37.49±1.52mmHg,升高者34例,平均MBPS值38.60±2.90mmHg,t检验显示P〈0.05。其余血脂(包括TG.HDL-C、LDL-C)分别进行分组比较,经t检验,P0.05。结论:血压晨峰与病程、血压级别有关,病程愈长、血压级别愈高者,其血压晨峰值愈大;血压晨峰与血脂异常有一定关系,TC或non-HDL-C异常者,其血压晨峰值愈大;血压晨峰愈大,患者愈容易出现尿微量白蛋白增高;血压晨峰值愈大,患者TCD血流情况、IMT愈容易出现异常;痰湿壅盛证患者血压晨峰值较其余证型高。
[Abstract]:Objective: through the relevant data collection of morning blood pressure surge of patients, to explore the distribution of TCM syndromes in patients with morning blood pressure surge and blood pressure levels, age, duration, blood lipid, urinary albumin, carotid intima-media thickness, the relationship between blood uric acid and related risk factors. Methods: from July 2015 to May 2016 in Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital adopted in cardiovascular department and diagnosed in patients with hypertension, 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with morning blood pressure peak and improve the rest of the inspection, after collecting relevant data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software, the results of the distribution of TCM syndromes in patients with morning blood pressure surge and blood pressure levels, age, duration, blood lipid, urine trace albumin, carotid intima-media thickness, the relationship between blood uric acid and related risk factors. Results: (1) study included 110 patients grouped according to TCM syndrome, Anger hyperactivity syndrome 26 cases, accounting for 23.6%, the average MBPS value of 37.54 + 1.58mmHg; Yin deficiency and yang hyperactivity syndrome 18 cases, accounting for 16.5%, the average value of MBPS 36.79 + 1.03mmHg two; deficiency of yin and Yang 23 cases, accounting for 23.9%, the average value of MBPS 36.99 + 0.96mmHg. phlegm dampness syndrome in 43 cases, accounting for 39.1%, 38.88 + 2.64mmHg. the single factor variance analysis, P0.05, significant difference between the average MBPS value. (2) groups according to the blood pressure level, grade 1 hypertension patients in 8 cases, accounting for 7.3%, the average MBPS value of 36.23 + 0.79mmHg; grade 2 hypertension patients in 24 cases, accounting for 21.8%, the average MBPS value of 37.34 + 2.27mmHg; grade 3 hypertension patients in 78 cases, accounting for 70.9%, the average MBPS value of 38.15 + 2.09mmHg, the single factor variance analysis showed that the level of P0.05, the difference was significant. (3) according to the age, under the age of 55 and the morning blood pressure surge in patients with 18 cases, accounting for 16.4%, the average MBPS value of 37.17 + 1.31mmHg; 56~65 Mbps in patients with 36 cases, accounting for 32.7%, average MBPS a value of 37.59 + 2.30mmHg; 66-75 year old blood pressure Morning peak in 22 cases, accounting for 20%, the average MBPS value of 38.16 + 2.93mmHg; 76~85 Mbps in patients with 34 cases, accounting for 30.9%, 38.17 + 1.35mmHg. by variance analysis, the average P0.05 value of MBPS, no significant difference. (4) groups according to the duration of hypertension, duration of less than 10 years in 61 cases, accounting for 55.5% MBPS, the average value of 37.37 + 1.88mmHg; duration ranged from 10~20 years in 24 cases, accounting for 21.8%, the average MBPS value of 38.05 + 1.51mmHg; the course of more than 20 years in 25 cases, accounting for 22.7%, 38.74 + 2.74mmHg. variance analysis showed that the average value of MBPS P0.05, the difference was significant. (5) grouped by IMT thickening, 20 cases of bilateral IMT thickening of MBPS, average 36.96 + 2.34mmHg; 17 cases of unilateral IMT thickening, the average MBPS36.92 + 1.22mmHg; 64 cases of bilateral IMT were thickened, 38.40 + 2.12mmHg. variance analysis showed that the average value of MBPS P0.05, the difference was significant. (6) grouped according to the 24h 24h rhythm rhythm, there were 18 cases, an average of MBPS a value of 37.58. 2.45mmHg; 83 cases of 24h rhythm disappeared or inverted, the average MBPS value of 37.96 + 2.05mmHg; by t test, P0.05. (7) group by AASI, AASI is less than 64 in 0.55 cases, the average MBPS value of 37.83 + 1.89mmHg; AASI is greater than or equal to 0.55 in 39 cases, the average MBPS value of 37.92 + 2.49mmHg. by comparison, P0.05. (8 TCD) groups according to the blood flow, 30 cases with normal TCD, the average value of MBPS 36.95 + 1.46mmHg TCD; 65 cases of abnormal blood flow, the average MBPS value of 38.24 + 2.12mmHg. by comparison, two groups of P0.05. (9) groups according to urinary albumin, 19 cases of microalbuminuria group increased, the average MBPS value of 39.48 + 3.02mmHg; normal group of 42 cases, the average MBPS value of 37.14 + 1.35mmHg. by comparison, P0.05. (10) groups according to the serum uric acid, uric acid in 59 cases of normal subjects, the average MBPS value of 37.33 + 1.10mmHg; uric acid increased in 36 cases, the average MBPS value of 37.43 + 1.25mmHg, by comparison, P0.05. (11) blood, 65 cases with normal TC. The average value of MBPS 37.52 + 1.54mmHg, T 36 cases of C increased, the average MBPS value of 38.084 + 2.86mHg, P < T test showed 67 cases of normal 0.05.NOn-HDL-C, the average MBPS value of 37.49 + 1.52mmHg, 34 cases were increased, the average MBPS value of 38.60 + 2.90mmHg, t P "0.05. test showed that the blood lipid (TG.HDL-C, LDL-C) were divided into groups by t test, P0.05. conclusion: morning blood pressure surge and the course of disease, blood pressure level, longer duration, higher blood pressure levels, the peak morning blood pressure is bigger; there is a certain relationship between morning blood pressure surge and dyslipidemia, TC or non-HDL-C are abnormal, the morning blood pressure peak morning blood pressure peak is bigger; larger, more patients prone to urinary albumin increased; morning blood pressure peak more blood flow in patients with TCD, IMT is more prone to abnormalities; phlegm dampness syndrome of morning blood pressure peak than the other syndromes.
【学位授予单位】:广州中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R259
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 闫金海;;血压晨峰对心血管事件的影响及其对策[J];实用医技杂志;2008年29期
2 郭慧峰;钟远;谈世进;黄高忠;崔亮;张臻;;老年原发性高血压患者血压晨峰的分析与干预研究[J];河北医学;2007年04期
3 宋越红;李建英;黄国秀;;老年原发性高血压患者血压晨峰与心血管危险因素相关性研究[J];临床心血管病杂志;2008年05期
4 冯品;王瑞英;;血压晨峰现象[J];心血管病学进展;2009年04期
5 陈永东;周丽;;血压晨峰现象及治疗概况[J];右江医学;2010年02期
6 王及华;;积极控制高血压晨峰现象[J];中国社区医师;2010年23期
7 苏海;;如何看待血压晨峰现象[J];中华高血压杂志;2010年07期
8 于冠华;;高血压晨峰现象的识别及护理[J];中国社区医师(医学专业);2011年02期
9 王银玲;谢志泉;;血压晨峰现象的研究进展[J];中国老年学杂志;2011年16期
10 王及华;;积极控制高血压晨峰现象[J];中国社区医师(医学专业);2011年27期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 刘芳超;葛增;杨学礼;黄建凤;;年龄是血压晨峰的独立危险因素[A];中国心脏大会(CHC)2011暨北京国际心血管病论坛论文集[C];2011年
2 方伟;祝光礼;魏丽萍;;中西医结合疗法对高血压患者血压晨峰现象的影响[A];第一届全国中西医结合心血管病中青年医师论坛论文汇编[C];2008年
3 胡家庭;;厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗高血压病患者血压晨峰现象的临床观察[A];中华医学会第11次心血管病学术会议论文摘要集[C];2009年
4 李丹;杨宇;罗荧荃;;nCPAP治疗对OSAHS合并血压晨峰患者血压与脑钠肽影响[A];2008年中国睡眠研究会第五届学术年会论文摘要汇编[C];2008年
5 毛敏;杨宇;罗荧荃;;OSAHS合并血压晨峰患者替米沙坦治疗前后血清BNP、ET-1水平及血压晨峰的临床观察[A];2008年中国睡眠研究会第五届学术年会论文摘要汇编[C];2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 宋灵燕;血压晨峰与动态动脉硬化指数及血压变异性的相关性研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
2 陈浩业;血压晨峰的中医证型特点与相关危险因素的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
3 江涛;高血压晨峰的时间药物干预研究[D];河北医科大学;2012年
4 毛敏;替米沙坦治疗睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征合并血压晨峰的高血压患者的临床观察[D];中南大学;2008年
5 胡小亮;慢性盐负荷及补钾对盐敏感性高血压患者血压晨峰的影响[D];济南大学;2012年
6 王银玲;高血压病:老年患者血压晨峰及昼夜节律的临床研究[D];广州医学院;2011年
7 李学根;高血压晨峰对患者靶器官损害的影响[D];浙江大学;2013年
8 梁金排;血压晨峰与冠状动脉病变的相关性研究[D];石河子大学;2014年
9 冯品;原发性高血压患者血压晨峰与靶器官损害的相关性研究[D];山西医科大学;2010年
10 韩瑞l,
本文编号:1685281
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/1685281.html