补中柴前连梅煎减少支气管扩张患者急性加重次数的临床疗效研究
本文选题:补中柴前连梅煎 + 稳定期 ; 参考:《中国中医科学院》2016年博士论文
【摘要】:支气管扩张是呼吸系统难治性疾病之一,继发性支气管扩张发病机制的关键环节为支气管感染和支气管阻塞,两者相互影响,形成恶性循环。大部分中医药专家认为在稳定期支气管扩张的病因病机以风、痰、热、毒、虚为主,虚主要以气虚为主。稳定期支气管扩张患者长期小剂量口服大环内脂类抗生素的研究引起大家关注,发现长期小剂量大环内酯类抗生素维持性治疗可显著减少急性加重的发生次数。中医药治疗在整体调节、改善机体状况、提高免疫力等方面具有一定优势,但在减少稳定期急性加重次数的研究相对较少,加强中医药治疗稳定期支气管扩张的研究,减少稳定期支气管扩张患者急性加重次数是一项重要研究课题。临床中发现柴前连梅煎治疗咳嗽日久,咳吐青绿痰病证,效果非常好,而稳定期支气管扩张患者反复咳吐青绿痰与之咳嗽日久,咳吐青绿痰病证非常相似。基于“火与元气不两立,一胜则一负”理论,同时根据稳定期支气管扩张肺脾气虚、痰热蕴肺的基本病机,组建了补中柴前连梅煎,从补元气,泻阴火,祛痰热方面治疗稳定期支气管扩张以减少急性加重次数。因此,我们开展了补中柴前连梅煎对稳定期支气管扩张急性加重次数影响的初步研究,为中医药治疗稳定期支气管扩张提供依据。目的:初步探讨补中柴前连梅煎对稳定期支气管扩张急性加重次数的影响,为中医药治疗稳定期支气管扩张提供依据。方法:采用随机对照的临床试验设计,选择70例稳定期无咯血患者,随机分为试验组及对照组,分别给与补中柴前连梅煎及阿奇霉素片治疗12周,随访12周。采用主要疗效指标(急性加重次数、症状评分、肺功能)及次要疗效指标(血清免疫球蛋白、L6, mMRC评分,FACED评分)进行评价分析。结果:1急性加重次数两组患者在3周、6周、9周、12周及随访12周急性加重次数组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。在治疗12周期间试验组的急性加重次数为0.49次/人,对照组为0.50次/人;随访12周内试验组的急性加重次数为0.48次/人,对照组为0.53次/人。两组在3周、6周、9周、12周及随访12周急性加重频次组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。2症状评分试验组总有效率为93.94%,对照组的总有效率为93.75%,两组之间疗效比较无统计学差异(P0.05),两组在0周、3周、6周及9周症状评分实测值组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05),在12周试验组症状评分明显小于对照组(P0.05)。两组症状评分组内前后比较都有显著差异(P0.01),两组在咳嗽、咯痰、胸闷气短、乏力、纳呆、自汗、腹胀及面色黄症状改善上无统计学差异(P0.05)。3肺功能两组治疗后VC、FEV1百分比组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05), FEV1/FVC百分比组间比较有显著统计学差异(P0.05),其中FEV1/FVC百分比试验组为74.30±11.046,对照组为61.40±14.377。两组患者肺功能组内前后比较无显著差异(P0.05)。4 FACED评分及mMRC评分治疗后两组患者FACED评分及mMRC评分组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05),两组患者mMRC评分组内前后比较有显著统计学差异(P0.01),FACED评分无统计学差异(P0.05)。5免疫球蛋白及IL6两组患者治疗后免疫球蛋白及IL6单项指标组间比较无统计学差异(P0.05),两组免疫球蛋白及IL6组内前后比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:1补中柴前连梅煎能明显减少稳定期支气管扩张患者急性加重次数。2补中柴前连梅煎能减轻稳定期支气管扩张患者的呼吸困难严重程度,明显改善稳患者的临床症状。
[Abstract]:Bronchiectasis is one of the refractory diseases of the respiratory system. The key link of the pathogenesis of secondary bronchiectasis is bronchial infection and bronchial obstruction. Both of them affect each other and form a vicious cycle. Most Chinese medicine experts believe that the etiology and pathogenesis of bronchiectasis in the stable period are wind, phlegm, heat, poison, deficiency mainly, and asthenia mainly with Qi deficiency. The study of long term small dose oral macrocyclic lipid antibiotics in patients with stable bronchiectasis has caused attention. It is found that long-term small dose of macrolide antibiotics maintenance therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of acute aggravation. Chinese medicine treatment in the overall regulation, improve the body condition, improve immunity and so on. However, the study of acute exacerbation times in the stable period is relatively few. It is an important research topic to strengthen the study of bronchiectasis in the stable period of Chinese medicine and reduce the acute aggravation times of bronchiectasis in the stable period. Patients with periodic bronchiectasis cough and vomit green and green phlegm repeatedly and cough day long, cough and vomit green phlegm syndrome very similar. Based on the theory of "fire and Qi not two upright, one victory one negative" theory, according to the basic pathogenesis of bronchiectasis and spleen qi deficiency of the bronchiectasis in the stable period, the basic pathogenesis of phlegm heat accumulation is established, from supplementing qi, reducing Qi and eliminating phlegm heat from the Tonifying Qi, yin and Yin fire. To treat stable bronchiectasis in order to reduce the number of acute exacerbations. Therefore, we have carried out a preliminary study on the effect of the decoction of Chinese medicine of Bu Zhong Chai on the acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis in the stable period, to provide a basis for the treatment of bronchiectasis in stable period of Chinese medicine. The effect of acute aggravation times was provided for the treatment of bronchiectasis in stable period of Chinese medicine. Methods: 70 cases of stable and non hemoptysis were randomly divided into experimental group and control group by randomized controlled clinical trial design. The patients were randomly assigned to the test group and the control group for 12 weeks, respectively, and followed up for 12 weeks. The standard (acute aggravation, symptom score, lung function) and secondary curative effect index (serum immunoglobulin, L6, mMRC score, FACED score) were evaluated. Results there was no statistical difference between the two groups of 1 acute aggravation groups at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, and 12 weeks (P0.05). In the treatment group, the experimental group was treated for the period of 12 weeks. The times of acute aggravation were 0.49 times per person and 0.50 times in the control group; the acute aggravation times of the test group were 0.48 times in the 12 week follow-up group and 0.53 times in the control group. The two groups were in 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 weeks of follow-up (P0.05), the total effective rate of the.2 symptom score group was 93.94%, and the total effective rate was 93.94%. The total effective rate of the group was 93.75%. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups at 0 weeks, 3 weeks, 6 and 9 weeks (P0.05), and the symptom scores in the 12 week group were significantly smaller than those in the control group (P0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups before and after the symptom score group (P0.01), and two groups in the two groups. There was no statistical difference between coughing, phlegm, shortness of chest tightness, fatigue, fatigue, anathesis, self perspiration, abdominal distension and yellow symptoms (P0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups of.3 lung function after treatment (P0.05), and there was a significant statistical difference between the FEV1/FVC percentage groups (P0.05), and the percentage of FEV1/FVC percentage was 74.30 + 11.046 in the group of FEV1/FVC. In the control group, there was no significant difference in the pulmonary function group between the 61.40 + 14.377. two groups (P0.05), and there was no statistical difference between the FACED score and the mMRC score group in the two groups after the treatment of the mMRC score (P0.05). There was significant difference (P0.01) between the two groups before and after the mMRC score group (P0.01), and there was no statistical difference between the FACED scores (P0.01). P0.05) there was no statistical difference between.5 immunoglobulin and IL6 two groups after treatment (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups of immunoglobulin and IL6 group (P0.05). Conclusion: 1 Bu Zhong Chai Lian Mei decoction can significantly reduce the acute exacerbation times of stable bronchiectasis patients.2 complacation. Pre - Lian Mei decoction can relieve the severity of dyspnea in patients with bronchiectasis in stable stage, and improve the clinical symptoms of stable patients.
【学位授予单位】:中国中医科学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R259
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 段建明,安新,许芳,张大明;42例老年支气管扩张大咯血的治疗体会[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2001年01期
2 张延泉;;支气管扩张[J];社区医学杂志;2006年04期
3 丁会;王建国;迟宝荣;;支气管哮喘与支气管扩张的关系[J];吉林大学学报(医学版);2006年03期
4 余毅;牛惠敏;;支气管动脉栓塞术治疗支气管扩张大咯血46例[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2006年04期
5 卢树标;吕文慧;荣福;;支气管扩张病例应用23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗的临床观察[J];海军医学杂志;2006年03期
6 张永标;张扣兴;;支气管扩张合并咯血的监护[J];新医学;2006年12期
7 蔡志容;;中西医结合治疗支气管扩张24例[J];现代医药卫生;2007年18期
8 王贵勤;;支气管扩张合并侵袭性肺曲霉菌病1例[J];中国临床保健杂志;2007年05期
9 马晓霞;李纪;;经纤维支气管镜注药治疗支气管扩张[J];中国医药导报;2008年14期
10 邵伯云;周维华;;支气管动脉栓塞治疗支气管扩张大咯血的疗效观察[J];临床肺科杂志;2009年09期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 丁会;迟宝荣;王建国;;支气管哮喘与支气管扩张的发病关系探讨[A];中华医学会第五次全国哮喘学术会议暨中国哮喘联盟第一次大会论文汇编[C];2006年
2 谭春婷;贺正一;刘颖;辛小燕;焦蕴敏;刘晓霞;;不同类型支气管扩张的比较研究[A];中华医学会第七次全国呼吸病学术会议暨学习班论文汇编[C];2006年
3 崔愈;;支气管扩张的护理体会[A];全国民政医学护理专业第三次学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年
4 谭晖;;中西医结合治疗支气管扩张40例[A];全国首届侗医药学术研讨会论文专辑[C];2004年
5 张跃海;;支气管扩张所致大咯血的介入治疗[A];2008年浙江省放射学年会论文汇编[C];2008年
6 杨达伟;宋元林;白春学;;支气管扩张合并囊性纤维化患者的临床回顾性研究[A];中华医学会呼吸病学年会——2011(第十二次全国呼吸病学学术会议)论文汇编[C];2011年
7 郭永庆;葛炳生;刘德若;石彬;田燕雏;李福田;宋之乙;;支气管剔除治疗支气管扩张[A];中华医学会第六次全国胸心血管外科学术会议论文集(胸外科分册)[C];2006年
8 陈卫强;薛庆亮;李继东;刘卫;;经纤维支气管镜治疗支气管扩张并感染临床观察[A];中华医学会呼吸病学年会——2013第十四次全国呼吸病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
9 田欣伦;吴翔;徐凯峰;朱元珏;;支气管扩张患者的病因及临床特点分析[A];中华医学会呼吸病学年会——2013第十四次全国呼吸病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
10 侯登华;郭玉林;蔡磊;杜玉秀;严冰;赵俊玲;袁志红;李云香;;超选择性支气管动脉介入栓塞术治疗支气管扩张引起的咯血附8例报告[A];第六届西部介入放射学术会议宁夏医学会放射学分会第四届年会介入放射学新技术继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报特约记者 俞忠良;支气管扩张能治好吗?[N];健康时报;2003年
2 北京中国中医研究院西苑医院呼吸科主任 张燕萍;支气管扩张能否根治[N];家庭医生报;2004年
3 时毓民;支气管扩张也会殃及儿童[N];家庭医生报;2008年
4 本报记者罗辉;支气管扩张能治好吗?[N];健康时报;2003年
5 呼吸内科专家历风光接听热线整理;患了支气管扩张该怎么办[N];家庭医生报;2004年
6 刘德若;支气管扩张术后为何还咯痰[N];健康报;2007年
7 时毓民;儿童也会有支气管扩张[N];家庭医生报;2008年
8 ;支气管扩张的防治原则[N];人民日报海外版;2001年
9 主任医师 于伟华;肺部感染后遗症怎么治疗[N];卫生与生活报;2006年
10 高静;治支气管扩张药膳[N];医药养生保健报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 樊长征;补中柴前连梅煎减少支气管扩张患者急性加重次数的临床疗效研究[D];中国中医科学院;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 赵亚楠;多层螺旋CT提示支气管扩张原因的价值研究[D];山西医科大学;2014年
2 赵京梅;慢性阻塞性肺疾病与支气管扩张并存的相关因素研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
3 叶宁;支气管扩张患者的肺功能改变及易于合并COPD的高危因素的探究[D];吉林大学;2016年
4 刘娇;182例重庆地区支气管扩张儿童临床特征及多中心病因构成分析[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
5 蒲晓新;支气管扩张的诊治现状[D];吉林大学;2015年
6 刘振刚;沙美特罗替卡松治疗支气管扩张并不可逆气流受限患者的疗效与安全性研究[D];山东大学;2012年
7 林琳;寇辉教授治疗支气管扩张临床经验浅谈[D];辽宁中医药大学;2011年
8 樊萍;支气管扩张病人痰分支杆菌检出率探讨[D];暨南大学;2003年
9 卫慧;清养化痰宁络法对支气管扩张干预的临床疗效及其机理研究[D];南京中医药大学;2007年
10 闫冰迪;支气管扩张患者病原菌种类及耐药性分析[D];吉林大学;2009年
,本文编号:1800156
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/1800156.html