中医科学性争论欠规范化问题探究
发布时间：2019-03-29 07:06
【摘要】：为科学有效地探讨中医科学性问题,据争论过程中表现出的政治化、全民化、泛文化、情绪化等"随意"性问题,提出争论应遵循同行争鸣原则、普遍主义原则、祛私利性原则、有创见的怀疑原则等规范,促进科学规范意识的形成,营造良好的学术环境。
[Abstract]:In order to discuss scientifically and effectively the scientific problem of traditional Chinese medicine, according to the political, universal, pan-cultural, emotional and other "random" issues in the course of the controversy, it is pointed out that the argument should follow the principle of peer-to-peer contention and the principle of universalism. The principle of eliminating self-interest and the principle of creative suspicion can promote the formation of the consciousness of scientific norms and create a good academic environment.
【作者单位】： 重庆文理学院公共管理学院;重庆文理学院学工部;
【基金】：重庆文理学院课题(Y2016GG56)
【分类号】：R2-0
本文编号：2449282
[Abstract]:In order to discuss scientifically and effectively the scientific problem of traditional Chinese medicine, according to the political, universal, pan-cultural, emotional and other "random" issues in the course of the controversy, it is pointed out that the argument should follow the principle of peer-to-peer contention and the principle of universalism. The principle of eliminating self-interest and the principle of creative suspicion can promote the formation of the consciousness of scientific norms and create a good academic environment.
【作者单位】： 重庆文理学院公共管理学院;重庆文理学院学工部;
【基金】：重庆文理学院课题(Y2016GG56)
【分类号】：R2-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 韩寅;陈发俊;;由“中医存废之争”看科学争论的社会意义[J];医学与哲学;2012年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张雨思;基于科学争论理论的物理教学策略研究[D];东北师范大学;2012年
2 陈蕾;评柯林斯的科学争论研究[D];山东大学;2006年
，本文编号：2449282
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/2449282.html
最近更新
教材专著
