当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 中医论文 >

疏肝和胃颗粒治疗幽门螺杆菌感染慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证)的临床观察

发布时间:2019-05-18 10:16
【摘要】:目的:本观察采用“疏肝理气,燥湿和胃”的治法,应用自拟方疏肝和胃颗粒治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证),通过临床观察,客观评价疏肝和胃颗粒治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证)的有效性及安全性。为中医药治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎提供用药依据。方法:将来自长春中医药大学附属医院肝脾胃病科门诊符合幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证)诊断的患者共60位,按1:1的比例随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组:疏肝和胃颗粒,每次1袋,每日3次;对照组:西药三联(奥美拉唑肠溶片20mg,克拉霉素500mg,阿莫西林1000mg),每日2次,上方药物连续应用2周后,继续单独服用奥美拉唑肠溶片2周(每日1次)。两组药物疗程均为4周。并分别记录治疗前后中医症状、胃黏膜改变、Hp转阴率、不良反应,并在治疗结束后的第15天随访复发情况。结果:(1)两组患者在治疗前年龄、性别、病程、中医症状积分、胃黏膜积分方面比较,统计学无显著差异(P0.05),具有可比性。(2)治疗后单项症状的改善:返酸这一症状的改善,两组治疗效果未见明显的统计学差异(P0.05)。但是,在胃脘疼痛、脘腹胀满、纳差、恶心、嗳气、小便黄这6个症状改善方面,有统计学差异(P0.05),治疗组的效果优于对照组。(3)治疗后中医症候总积分情况:较治疗前均有所降低,但治疗组症状积分下降幅度更大。在中医证候改善方面比较,有显著统计学差异(P0.01),治疗组优于对照组。(4)胃黏膜改变比较:治疗组30例愈显率53.33%,总有效率为80.00%;对照组30例愈显率40%,总有效率为73.33%。经秩和检验,治疗组和对照组在治疗后改善胃粘膜情况上无差异。(5)Hp改善比较:治疗组30例中,治疗后Hp(-)14例,Hp(+)16例,总转阴率为46.67%;对照组30例中,治疗后Hp(-)22例,Hp(+)8例,总转阴率为73.33%;有统计学差异(P0.05),对照组在治疗后Hp转阴率优于治疗组。(6)总体疗效比较:治疗组30例患者愈显率70%,总有效率为86.67%;对照组30例患者愈显率36.67%,总有效率为73.33%。有显著统计学差异(P0.01)。治疗组的总体临床疗效优于对照组。(7)安全性比较:两组药物均为出现不良反应事件。(8)随访:治疗结束2周后随访受试者,治疗组患者随访时症状积分无明显改变,对照组随访时较治疗后明显增高。两组比较有显著统计学差异(P0.05),说明在症状改善方面治疗组的远期疗效优于对照组。结论:由以上得出的数据说明疏肝和胃颗粒在治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证)过程中所有的患者未出现明显的不良反应,且总体疗效及症状改善均优于对照组,由此证明了本方法能够有效消除或改善患者的临床症状,提高他们的生活质量且安全无毒副作用。进一步验证并丰富了中医理论的科学性和实用性,为以后临床上治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性非萎缩性胃炎的患者提供了有意的参考。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the method of "soothing the liver and regulating qi, dryness and dampness and stomach" and using self-made prescription Shugan and Wei granule to treat chronic non-atrophic gastritis (hepatogastric stagnation and heat syndrome) with HP infection. Objective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Shugan Hewei granule in the treatment of chronic non-atrophic gastritis (hepatogastric depression-heat syndrome) infected with HP. It provides drug basis for traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of chronic non-atrophic gastritis with HP infection. Methods: a total of 60 patients with chronic non-atrophic gastritis (hepatogastric depression and heat syndrome) diagnosed by HP infection were randomly divided into treatment group and control group according to the proportion of 1:1. Treatment group: Shugan and Wei granule, one bag at a time, 3 times a day; Control group: omeprazole enteric-coated tablets (omeprazole enteric-coated tablets 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000mg), twice a day, after 2 weeks of continuous administration of omeprazole enteric-coated tablets, continue to take omeprazole enteric-coated tablets alone for 2 weeks (once a day). The course of treatment of both groups was 4 weeks. The symptoms of traditional Chinese medicine, the changes of gastric mucosa, the negative rate of Hp and the adverse reactions were recorded before and after treatment, and the recurrence was followed up on the 15th day after treatment. Results: (1) there was no significant difference in age, sex, course of disease, TCM symptom score and gastric mucous membrane score between the two groups before treatment (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the effect of treatment between the two groups (P 0.05). (2) the improvement of single symptom after treatment: there was no significant difference in the effect of acid regurgitation between the two groups (P 0.05). However, there were significant differences in the improvement of six symptoms: epigastric pain, epigastric distension, anorexia, nausea, belching and urination yellow (P 0.05). The effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. (3) the total score of TCM symptoms after treatment: it was lower than that before treatment, but the symptom score of the treatment group decreased more significantly. In the improvement of TCM syndromes, there was significant difference (P01), the treatment group was better than the control group. (4) comparison of gastric mucous membrane changes: the effective rate of 30 cases in the treatment group was 53.33%, and the total effective rate was 80.00%; In the control group, the effective rate was 40% and the total effective rate was 73.33%. There was no difference in the improvement of gastric mucosa between the treatment group and the control group by rank sum test. (5) comparison of Hp improvement: among 30 cases in the treatment group, 14 cases of, Hp () (-) in the treatment group had 16 cases of, Hp () after treatment, the total negative conversion rate was 46.67%; In the control group, there were 22 cases of Hp (-) and 8 cases of, Hp () after treatment, the total negative conversion rate was 73.33%. There was significant difference (P 0.05). The negative rate of Hp in the control group was better than that in the treatment group after treatment. (6) comparison of the overall efficacy: the effective rate of 30 patients in the treatment group was 70%, and the total effective rate was 86.67%. In the control group, the effective rate was 36.67% and the total effective rate was 73.33%. There was significant statistical difference (P 0.01). The overall clinical efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. (7) Safety comparison: there were adverse events in both groups. (8) follow-up: after 2 weeks of treatment, there was no significant change in the symptom score of the patients in the treatment group. The follow-up period in the control group was significantly higher than that after treatment. There was significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), indicating that the long-term effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in symptom improvement. Conclusion: the data obtained above show that Shugan and Wei granules have no obvious adverse reactions in the treatment of chronic non-atrophic gastritis (hepatogastric depression and heat syndrome) caused by HP infection. The overall curative effect and symptom improvement were better than those in the control group, which proved that this method could effectively eliminate or improve the clinical symptoms of patients, improve their quality of life and have no toxic and side effects. It further verifies and enriches the scientific and practical theory of traditional Chinese medicine, and provides an intentional reference for the clinical treatment of patients with chronic non-atrophic gastritis infected with HP in the future.
【学位授予单位】:长春中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R259

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李皓平;赵立诚;;肝胃郁热鼻圔[J];广东医学(祖国医学版);1965年06期

2 林艳;张雷;王旭;;艽龙胶囊治疗肝胃郁热证功能性消化不良疗效观察[J];吉林医药学院学报;2011年04期

3 郭进建,邱玉珍;消化性溃疡肝胃郁热证92例治疗观察[J];福建中医学院学报;1999年02期

4 冯小艳;邵明义;段飞;;魏明主任中医师运用理气清热方治疗反流性食管炎肝胃郁热证经验[J];中医研究;2013年12期

5 赵文;魏明;;奥瑞凝胶治疗反流性食管炎(肝胃郁热证)临床研究[J];新中医;2012年03期

6 龚建芳;;旋复代赭汤合小柴胡汤治疗反流性食管炎肝胃郁热证44例[J];中国中医药现代远程教育;2013年18期

7 孙吉;朱生j;马淑颖;王晓素;孔婧;;反流性食管炎胆热犯胃和肝胃郁热证辨证特点研究[J];中西医结合学报;2011年07期

8 宋军;仝小林;赵林华;姬航宇;;开郁清热方对2型糖尿病肝胃郁热证患者糖脂代谢的影响[J];中医杂志;2011年19期

9 赵昱;陈良;董柳;毕桂芝;仝小林;;肥胖T2DM肝胃郁热证患者胰岛素分泌特点研究[J];中华中医药学刊;2012年01期

10 朱英华;成洪书;;化郁清胃颗粒治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证疗效观察[J];中国当代医药;2010年19期

相关会议论文 前6条

1 柳红芳;仝小林;;消渴病从肝胃郁热论治的理论探讨[A];2002中医药博士论坛——中医药的继承、创新与发展[C];2002年

2 孙吉;马淑颖;王晓素;朱生j;;胃食管反流病胆热犯胃、肝胃郁热证辨证研究[A];中华中医药学会第二十二届全国脾胃病学术交流会暨2010年脾胃病诊疗新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2010年

3 胡锦丽;汪红兵;吴兵;张声生;;化郁清胃颗粒治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证临床疗效观察[A];中华中医药学会第二十一届全国脾胃病学术交流会暨2009年脾胃病诊疗新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2009年

4 汪红兵;胡锦丽;吴兵;张声生;;化郁清胃颗粒治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证临床疗效观察[A];2009年中华中医药学会内科分会全国中医内科临床科学研究专题研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年

5 胡锦丽;汪红兵;吴兵;张声生;;化郁清胃颗粒治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证临床疗效观察[A];北京中医药学会2012年学术年会论文汇编[C];2012年

6 丁培杰;刘华一;;刘华一教授治疗胃痛经验[A];中华中医药学会脾胃病分会第二十三次全国脾胃病学术交流会论文汇编[C];2011年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 陕西中医学院附属医院脾胃病科 王捷虹;左金丸配刺猬皮 清肝胃郁热制胃酸[N];中国中医药报;2010年

2 上海中医药大学附属龙华医院 医学博士 张涛;口中异味不用愁中药调理显身手(下)[N];家庭医生报;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 常玲;疏肝和胃颗粒治疗幽门螺杆菌感染慢性非萎缩性胃炎(肝胃郁热证)的临床观察[D];长春中医药大学;2016年

2 俞冲;艽龙胶囊治疗功能性消化不良(肝胃郁热证)的临床研究[D];南京中医药大学;2009年

3 李季;柴连饮治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证的临床疗效观察[D];山东中医药大学;2013年

4 吴燕华;泻肝和胃法治疗反流性食管炎肝胃郁热证的临床研究[D];南京中医药大学;2010年

5 李晓晖;胃病2号颗粒治疗反流性食管炎(肝胃郁热证)的临床研究[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2011年

6 孙晓伟;清热和胃降逆方治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热证临床疗效观察与机理探讨[D];山东中医药大学;2009年

7 车慧;清热降浊方治疗肥胖2型糖尿病合并血脂异常(肝胃郁热证)临床研究的亚组分析[D];北京中医药大学;2012年

8 仲琴;开郁清胃化瘀法治疗肥胖2型糖尿病肝胃郁热夹瘀证的临床研究[D];南京中医药大学;2012年



本文编号:2479910

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/2479910.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4a54d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com