priced ebony occupatio of bona vacatia thesaurii inventio
本文关键词:“天价乌木案”凸显《物权法》适用之惑,由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
“天价乌木案”凸显《物权法》适用之惑
"High-priced Ebony" Case Highlights Confusions in the Application of Property Law
[1]
ZHOU Hui-bin ( Hunan Normal University Law School, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China)
湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081
文章摘要:近来媒体广为关注的“天价鸟木案”本质上是一起无主物先占引起的权属纠纷,由于《物权法》对于无主物先占制度采取了拒绝的立场,从而致使法院陷入无法可依的境地,笔者建议法院依法、科学、合理地运用法律赋予的自由裁量权,根据无主物先占制度的法理学说对本案作出判决,以推动立法最终承认无主物先占制度。从目前的情况看,法院试图以发现埋藏物制度来解决本案的诉争事项,笔者以为,《物权法》与《民法通则》关于发现埋藏物的规定完全不同,法律适用的逻辑与结果也不完全相同,而且,适用《物权法》第114条发现埋藏物“参照拾得遗失物的规定”既不符合实际情形,也会产生不公平的结果,更会使法院的法律适用逻辑难以自圆其说。有鉴于此,,笔者建议立法机关或最高司法机关重构我国独立的发现埋藏物制度。
Abstr:Recently widely covered "high-priced ebony" case in the media is essentially a dispute concerning occupatio of bona vacatia. The Property Law take a rejection position to the occupatio of bona vacatia, thereby resulting in the court into a situation without rules. I suggest that the court should use the fight of the discretion conferred by law legally, scientifically and rationally, and make a judgment for the present case catia, thus promoting the legislative according to the jurisprudence doctrine of occupatio of bona vaacknowledgement of occupatio of bona vacatia. In the current situation, the court is trying to solve disputable matters this case by thesaurii inventio. I think, Property Law and General Rules of Civil Law respectively have completely different provisions about thesaurii inventio, so do the logic and results of the application of the law. What's more, the application of Article 114 of the Property Law, which stipulates thesaurii inventio with reference to the provisions of lost-and-found objects, does not comply with the actual situation and will produce unfair results, which makes the court's application logic of law more difficult to justify. Given all those aspects, the author recommends that the legislature or the highest judicial organ to reconstruct our own thesaurii inventio regime.
文章关键词:
Keyword::high-priced ebony occupatio of bona vacatia thesaurii inventio
作者信息:会员可见
本文关键词:“天价乌木案”凸显《物权法》适用之惑,由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
本文编号:195900
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falvtiaokuanjiedu/195900.html