知识产权司法鉴定主体问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 03:39

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：主体　出处：《沈阳工业大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权诉讼案件往往伴随着高度专业性、复杂性,所涉及的争议焦点通常是超出一般人所能掌握的尖端科学技术,如果不能对这些技术问题进行充分专业的鉴定和说明,将导致诉讼难以顺利进行。可见,知识产权司法鉴定对于知识产权诉讼的审理具有重要作用,而知识产权司法鉴定机构及鉴定人,专家辅助人,新兴的技术调查官这三大类主体在知识产权司法鉴定中则扮演着相当重要的角色。论文首先在明确何为知识产权司法鉴定的前提下,从知识产权司法鉴定主体的概念入手,分析其在知识产权司法鉴定中起到的具体作用以及他们之间的联系与区别。其次,剖析了知识产权司法鉴定主体制度在实际运行中存在的一些问题,如知识产权司法鉴定人才稀缺,鉴定机构的管理和使用衔接脱节,专家辅助人不够中立客观,技术调查官的职能定位不明确,这些问题的存在严重制约了知识产权司法鉴定应有的功能发挥。再次,针对上述问题,运用比较的方法,对中外知识产权司法鉴定主体制度进行对比,综合研究了英美法系与大陆法系国家的相关规定对我国的启示。最后提出了完善我国知识产权司法鉴定主体制度的建议,如多种方式培养知识产权司法鉴定人才,成立知识产权司法鉴定共同体。推进知识产权司法鉴定机构行业能力水平建设,建立鉴定机构统一的管理制度,规范专家辅助人在知识产权司法鉴定中的相关权利义务与责任,细化技术调查官在知识产权诉讼中应承担的司法鉴定职能等。希望通过本篇论文的相关阐述能够对我国知识产权司法鉴定在实践中应用有所助益。
[Abstract]:Lawsuit of intellectual property rights is often accompanied by a high degree of professionalism, complexity, the controversy involved is usually beyond the advanced science and technology people can grasp, if not fully professional identification and description of these technical problems, will lead to litigation to go smoothly. Therefore, the judicial identification of intellectual property plays an important role in knowledge the property of the trial proceedings, and the intellectual property rights of judicial authentication institutions and identification, expert assisted, emerging technology investigators, these three kinds of subjects in the judicial identification of intellectual property has played a very important role. Firstly, what is clear in the premise of judicial identification of intellectual property under the concept of the judicial identification of the main body of knowledge property rights, the specific role in the analysis of the judicial identification of intellectual property plays as well as their relations and differences. Secondly, analyzes the intellectual property judicial authentication Some problems existing in the operation of the main system, such as the judicial identification of intellectual talent scarcity, appraisal institutions disjointed management and use of cohesion, the expert assistant is not neutral and objective functions, positioning technology officer is not clear, the existence of these problems seriously restrict the function of judicial identification of intellectual property due to play. Once again, the the problem, using the method of comparison, comparison of the Chinese and foreign intellectual property judicial appraisal system, a comprehensive study of the implications of the relevant provisions of the common law and civil law countries in China. Finally, put forward to perfect our judicial identification of the main system of intellectual property rights, such as a variety of ways to cultivate talents of judicial identification of intellectual property rights, the establishment of the judicial identification of intellectual property. The intellectual property community to promote the judicial authentication institutions industry ability construction, establish unified management system authentication institutions, The relevant rights and obligations and responsibilities of the expert assistant in the specification of intellectual property in judicial expertise, refining technology investigators should undertake in the intellectual property litigation in the judicial functions. Hope that through the related elaboration this thesis will be useful for the application of judicial identification of China's intellectual property rights in practice.

【学位授予单位】：沈阳工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.4;D918.9

【相似文献】