毒品犯罪侦查中的体内采样与人权保护

发布时间：2018-04-01 15:39

本文选题：毒品犯罪　切入点：强制采样　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】："贾洛诉德国案"的裁决反映出欧洲人权法院在毒品犯罪侦查体内采样中对人格尊严保护的基本立场,即禁止给犯罪嫌疑人基本人权和人格尊严造成严重侵犯的强制采样方式。在世界范围内,美国禁止采用不恰当的方式强制催吐;日本在法官许可前提下可以强制采尿;欧洲国家存在禁止和允许强制催吐两种实践。我国实践中对于体内毒品的获取,一般采用药物排泄的方式,但在强制采样刑事立法上仍处于空白状态。纵观世界范围内毒品犯罪侦查的实践,不难发现,强制采样以保障基本人权和人格尊严为前提,各国强制采样的规则对我国通过立法规制强制采样,平衡强制采样过程中打击犯罪和保障人权两大价值,具有重要的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:The decision in Jallow v. Germany reflected the fundamental position of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of human dignity in the in-vivo sampling of drug offences, In the world, the United States forbids the use of inappropriate means to compel vomiting; Japan can forcibly collect urine under the permission of a judge; There are two kinds of practices in European countries that prohibit and permit forcible vomiting. In our country's practice, drug excretion is generally used in the acquisition of drugs in the body. But it is still blank in the criminal legislation of compulsory sampling. Looking at the practice of drug crime investigation in the world, it is not difficult to find that compulsory sampling is based on the guarantee of basic human rights and human dignity. The rule of compulsory sampling in various countries is of great significance for our country to regulate compulsory sampling through legislation and to balance the value of fighting crime and protecting human rights in the process of compulsory sampling.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：高一飞教授主持的2014年度国家社科基金重点项目“司法公开实施机制研究”(立项号14AFX013) 2014年度最高人民法院重大理论课题“司法领域公民知情权研究”(2014sp010) 2015年中国法学会“深入研究党的十八届四中全会精神”重点专项课题“司法公开实施状况评估和建议”[CLS(2015)ZDZX10]的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D918

【相似文献】