当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 治安法论文 >

“大三通”背景下福建社会治安问题探析

发布时间:2018-04-26 10:29

  本文选题:大三通 + 社会治安 ; 参考:《福建师范大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】:胡锦涛总书记在“十七大”报告中强调,“要牢牢把握两岸关系和平发展的主题,真诚为两岸同胞谋福祉、为台海地区谋和平,维护国家主权和领土完整,维护中华民族根本利益”,并首度提出“在一个中国原则基础上,协商正式结束两岸敌对状态,达成和平协议”。近年来,随着海峡两岸关系的不断发展,经济、社会、文化、科技、宗教、体育、卫生、学术等方面的联系日益紧密,两岸经贸交流和人员往来更加频繁,范围更加广泛,形式更加多样,涉及两岸的犯罪活动日益猖獗,贩毒、走私、诈骗、绑架、敲诈勒索、制售假币等两岸间跨境犯罪形式也日益多样化,并严重危害了两岸同胞的合法权益。两岸司法(警察)机关均多次表达了打击犯罪的共同意愿,但受限于政治因素,两岸司法部门缺乏顺畅的沟通渠道和配合机制,影响了两岸司法机关对不法分子的打击与惩处力度。因此,如何减少影响两岸治安的不利因素,维护两岸同胞生命、财产安全,共同打击和惩处危害两岸同胞的犯罪活动,加强两岸刑事司法协作及共同治理社会治安,成为当前亟待解决的课题。 两岸应加强合作,携手全面、深入打击刑事犯罪活动,让犯罪分子慑于压力,收敛犯罪触角,为实现两岸治安平和稳定,推进和谐社会建设和两岸民众安居乐业提供良好的环境。本文通过对“大三通”前后两岸出现的一系列的治安新问题进行现状剖析及原因分析,从建立和完善相关制度,共同打击跨区域犯罪;开展两岸刑事司法协作商谈,加强两岸打击刑事犯罪司法协作;建立试点先行先试,探索两岸共同打击犯罪的途径;逐步完善司法制度,构建“两岸警务一体化”合作框架等方面提出相应对策。
[Abstract]:General Secretary Hu Jintao stressed in the report of the 17th National Congress that "it is necessary to firmly grasp the theme of the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, sincerely strive for the well-being of compatriots on both sides of the strait, seek peace for the Taiwan Strait region, and safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity." "safeguard the fundamental interests of the Chinese nation," and put forward for the first time, "on the basis of the one-China principle, formally end cross-strait hostilities through consultation and reach a peace agreement." In recent years, with the continuous development of cross-strait relations, economic, social, cultural, scientific, technological, religious, sports, health, academic and other aspects of the relationship, cross-strait economic and trade exchanges and personnel exchanges have become more frequent and extensive. The forms of cross-border crimes such as drug trafficking, smuggling, fraud, kidnapping, extortion, making and selling counterfeit currency, and other forms of cross-border crimes between the two sides of the strait are becoming more and more diversified, and have seriously endangered the legitimate rights and interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait. The judicial (police) organs on both sides of the strait have repeatedly expressed their common will to combat crime, but limited by political factors, the judicial authorities on both sides of the strait lack a smooth communication channel and cooperation mechanism. Affected the two sides of the judicial organs to break the law and the degree of punishment. Therefore, how to reduce the adverse factors affecting cross-strait public order, safeguard the lives and property security of compatriots on both sides of the strait, jointly crack down on and punish criminal activities that endanger compatriots on both sides of the strait, strengthen criminal judicial cooperation between the two sides and jointly administer public order, It has become an urgent task to be solved. The two sides of the strait should strengthen cooperation, work hand in hand and thoroughly crack down on criminal activities, so that criminals can be deterred from pressure and converge on their criminal tentacles in order to achieve peace and stability on both sides of the strait. Promoting the construction of a harmonious society and providing a good environment for people on both sides of the strait to live and work in peace and contentment. Through the analysis of the current situation and the causes of a series of new public security problems on both sides of the strait before and after the "three links", this article aims at establishing and perfecting relevant systems to jointly crack down on cross-regional crimes, and carrying out cross-strait criminal judicial cooperation talks. Strengthening the judicial cooperation between the two sides of the strait in cracking down on criminal crimes; setting up a pilot trial first to explore the ways for the two sides to jointly crack down on crime; perfecting the judicial system step by step; constructing the cooperation framework of "the integration of the two sides of the strait of police affairs" and so on.
【学位授予单位】:福建师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D631.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈沛林;;论香港打击黑社会有组织犯罪的立法与实践[J];北方法学;2008年02期

2 刘为军;欧盟警务一体化的现状与发展趋势[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2005年02期

3 吴仲柱;;两岸警务协作实践与深化路径[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期

4 王伟;;假币犯罪研究[J];公安研究;2009年08期

5 易志华;马进保;;“一国两制”框架下的区际司法协助[J];广州社会主义学院学报;2007年04期

6 苏宁;;两岸“大三通”全景回放[J];两岸关系;2009年02期

7 曹建明;;联手打击跨国有组织犯罪 共同维护区域安全与稳定[J];人民检察;2009年08期

8 杨凯;当代中国区际刑事管辖冲突解决原则检讨[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期

9 程荣斌;我国海峡两岸交往中的刑事诉讼问题[J];政法论坛;1991年03期

10 赵秉志,黄芳;区际刑事司法协助法律研讨会综述[J];中国刑事法杂志;2002年04期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 许皆清;台湾地区有组织犯罪与对策研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 赵巍;闽台通婚问题研究[D];福建师范大学;2008年



本文编号:1805673

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/1805673.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户72ac0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com