低阶层男性服刑人员财产型犯罪影响因素研究

发布时间：2018-06-13 00:40

本文选题：自我控制 + 社会联系　；参考：《中国政法大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 财产型犯罪是主要的犯罪类型之一,但是关于财产型犯罪的影响因素的探讨比较缺乏。鉴于低阶层男性财产型犯罪的研究不足的的现状,本研究在自我控制理论、社会控制理论和社会支持理论的理论研究框架下,从个体微观的角度考察个体的人口学变量、自我控制、社会联系、社会支持及相对剥夺感等不同因素对财产型犯罪类型的影响,同时分析了不同因素对于犯罪行为刑期的影响。本研究的被试来自于山东省、广东省、山西省、上海市等五个省市的监狱系统,问卷发放1000份,有效问卷909份。研究者对调查问卷采用相关分析及路径分析的方法探究影响财产型犯罪和刑期的影响因素,并采用方差分析的方法检验财产型犯罪与非财产型犯罪在不同社会阶层等人口学变量、自我控制、社会联系、社会支持和相对剥夺感方面的差异。研究结果发现: 1、在男性服刑人员中,财产型犯罪占有66.3%,且不同阶层、不同年龄、不同家庭收入其犯罪类型存在显著差异;具体犯罪类型以盗窃和抢劫两类犯罪为主,占到男性犯罪类型中的58.6%。 2、在自我控制能力上,不同社会阶层的自我控制能力、冲动冒险性呈现显著差异,社会下层均呈现最高的自我控制能力得分和冲动冒险性得分;财产型犯罪与非财产型犯罪的自我控制没有呈现显著差异。 3、在社会联系变量上,不同社会阶层的社会联系及各个维度均呈现显著差异,社会下层的社会联系及各维度明显低于社会中上层。不同犯罪类型的社会联系没有呈现显著差异。 4、在社会支持程度上,不同犯罪类型的社会支持及各维度没有呈现显著差异,得分显示财产型犯罪社会支持得分低于非财产性犯罪得分;不同社会阶层的社会支持及各维度均呈现显著差异,社会下层的社会支持及各维度得分显著低于中高阶层。 5、在相对剥夺感的得分上,不同受教育程度个体的相对剥夺感呈现显著差异,受教育程度高的被试其相对剥夺感较低;不同收入水平和不同犯罪类型的被试其相对剥夺感没有呈现显著差异;不同社会阶层的相对剥夺感呈现显著差异,社会下层的相对剥夺感得分显著高于社会上层的得分。 6、关于财产型犯罪影响因素的探讨,结果表明年龄、家庭年收入、受教育程度、社会阶层与财产型犯罪行为具有密切的关系,结果显示社会下层比其他阶层更容易发生财产型犯罪;自我控制及各维度,社会联系中的参与、承诺和信念、社会支持和主观支持以及相对剥夺感是影响财产型犯罪的因素。 7、对犯罪行为刑期的影响因素的探讨显示,年龄和受教育程度对于犯罪刑期具有正向的预测作用;社会联系对于犯罪刑期具有显著的影响作用;自我控制社会支持和相对剥夺感没有显著的预测作用,中介变量效应不显著。综合本研究研究结果,男性服刑人员财产型犯罪的影响因素是复杂的,半数以上自我报告显示其犯罪的原因是为了获取钱财,另一个在数量上占优势的自我报告的犯罪原因是情绪失控,这在一定程度上说明,个体的微观因素,即自我控制能力、社会联系的质量、社会支持的程度以及感受相对剥夺感的强弱都是影响犯罪行为的重要因素。
[Abstract]:Property type crime is one of the main types of crime, but there is a lack of discussion on the influencing factors of property type crime. In view of the present situation of the low class male property crime, this study is based on the theoretical research framework of self-control theory, social control theory and social support theory, from the individual microcosmic perspective. The influence of individual demographic variables, self control, social contact, social support and relative deprivation on the type of property type crime, and the influence of different factors on the criminal period of criminal behavior. The subjects of this study came from the prison system in five provinces, such as Shandong, Guangdong, Shanxi, Shanghai and other provinces and cities. 1000 copies, 909 valid questionnaires.
The researchers used the method of correlation analysis and path analysis to explore the influence factors of property type crime and the term of sentence, and use the method of variance analysis to test the difference of demography variables such as property type crime and non property crime in different social strata, self-control, social connection, social support and relative deprivation. The results of the study found that:
1, among the male prisoners, property type crime occupies 66.3%, and there are significant differences in the types of crime between different classes, different ages, and family income. The specific types of crime are mainly the theft and robbery of two types of crime, which account for 58.6%. in the male crime type.
2, in the self-control ability, the self control ability of different social strata, impulse and adventure show significant difference, the lower level of society has the highest self-control score and impulse adventure score, and the self control of property type crime and non property crime has no significant difference.
3, on social contact variables, the social connections and various dimensions of different social strata show significant differences, and the social connections and dimensions of the lower social strata are obviously lower than the upper levels of the society. There is no significant difference in social relations between different types of crime.
4, in social support, there are no significant differences in social support and dimensions of different types of crime. The score shows that the score of social support for property type crime is lower than that of non property crime; the social support and various dimensions of different social strata show significant differences, and the social support and the scores of various dimensions in the lower level are significantly lower than those of the social strata. Middle and high class.
5, on the score of relative deprivation, the relative deprivation sense of the individuals with different degree of education is significantly different, and the relative deprivation sense of the subjects with higher education level is lower; the relative deprivation sense of the subjects with different income levels and different types of crime is not significantly different, and the relative deprivation sense of the social class is significantly different. The relative deprivation score of the lower class was significantly higher than that of the upper class.
6, on the influence factors of property type crime, the results show that age, family income, education, social stratum and property type crime have a close relationship. The result shows that the lower level of society is more likely to have property type crime than other strata; self control and various dimensions, social connections, commitment and belief, social support. Holding and subjective support and relative deprivation are the factors that affect property crime.
7, the study of the influencing factors of the criminal term shows that age and educational level have a positive predictive effect on the criminal sentence; social connection has a significant impact on the criminal sentence; self controlled social support and relative deprivation have no significant predictive effect, and the effect of intermediary variables is not significant.
According to the results of this study, the factors affecting the crime of male prisoners are complex. More than half of the self reports show that the cause of the crime is to obtain money. The other is the reason for the self reporting of the crime is out of control, to a certain extent, the microcosmic factor of the individual, that is, self control. The ability to make social connections, the degree of social support and the relative deprivation of feelings are important factors affecting criminal behavior.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D917.2

【参考文献】