论我国暂予监外执行的法律监督
发布时间:2018-06-16 21:22
本文选题:暂予监外执行 + 法律监督 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着刑罚执行社会化的不断发展,许多国家开始大量适用非监禁刑。非监禁刑相较于监禁刑不但大大降低了行刑成本,更有利于教育和改造罪犯,将低再犯率。近年来,我国越来越重视对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人权保障,制定了以保障人权为基础的暂予监外执行制度,以确保犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的基本权利。由于暂予监外执行制度变相减轻了刑罚,如果对这一制度使用不当又缺乏有效监督,就会极易导致执法混乱,滋生腐败,使本应监禁的犯罪分子利用非法手段逍遥法外。因此,如何通过立法手段对暂予监外执行及其法律监督进行规制,平衡暂予监外执行制度在打击犯罪与保障人权价值上的冲突,建立适合我国国情的暂予监外执行法律监督机制,从而实现我国设立暂予监外执行制度以保障罪犯人权的根本目的,是我国法治化进程中必须解决的问题。本文从暂予监外执行的概念及其法律监督的概念作为切入点,在考察了我国关于暂予监外执行及其法律监督的立法沿革和司法实践的基础上,结合我国刑事诉讼法的最新规定,分析现阶段立法和司法上的不足之处,提出了从完善立法立法、建立检察机关的同步监督机制和利用社会力量监督三个方面来构建我国暂予监外执行法律监督机制。全文分四章: 第一章概括论述了暂予监外执行及其法律监督概念和价值。首先论证了暂予监外执行的概念以及暂予监外执行的基本特征;接着论述了法律监督的内涵和外延;最后分析了暂予监外执行法律监督的价值。 第二章是对我国暂予监外执行法律监督的立法与实践考察。首先介绍了从新中国成立以来我国暂予监外执行制度及其法律监督在立法上的相关规定,并指出我国现行法律规定,尤其是新修订的刑事诉讼法的对其改进以及依然存在的缺陷和漏洞;其次分析了我国暂予监外执行法律监督在司法实践中存在的问题,并分析我国暂予监外执行法律监督制度不足的原因。 第三章阐述从立法上改革和完善我国暂予监外执行的法律监督。首先从统一暂予监外执行的批准机关出发,然后论述如何完善暂予监外执行的批准程序,最后阐述修改和完善社区矫正相关法律法规,以确保有关机关从暂予监外执行的批准到执行都能进行及时、全面的法律监督。 第四章是论述如何构建暂予监外执行的检察监督机制。重点论证如何改进监督手段,加强相关机构间的联动机制以及完善责任追究机制,并适当利用社会监督的力量,构建我国暂予监外执行的同步监督机制。
[Abstract]:With the development of socialization of penalty execution, many countries begin to apply non-custodial punishment. Compared with the imprisonment penalty, the non-custodial penalty not only reduces the execution cost, but also helps to educate and reform the criminals and reduce the recidivism rate. In recent years, our country pays more and more attention to the human rights protection of criminal suspects and defendants, and has formulated a temporary execution system based on the protection of human rights to ensure the basic rights of criminal suspects and defendants. As the temporary system of execution out of prison reduces the penalty in disguise, if this system is not properly used and lacks effective supervision, it will easily lead to confusion of law enforcement, breed corruption and make criminals who should be imprisoned go unpunished by illegal means. Therefore, how to regulate the temporary outside execution and its legal supervision through legislative means, and balance the conflict between fighting crime and safeguarding the value of human rights. It is necessary to solve the problem in the process of rule of law in our country to establish a legal supervision mechanism suitable to the situation of our country and to realize the basic purpose of establishing a temporary execution system outside prison in order to protect the human rights of criminals in the course of our country's rule of law. Based on the concept of temporary execution outside prison and the concept of legal supervision as a starting point, this paper examines the legislative evolution and judicial practice of temporary execution outside prison and its legal supervision, and combines the latest provisions of our criminal procedure law. This paper analyzes the shortcomings of legislation and judicature at the present stage, and puts forward the following three aspects: perfecting legislation, establishing synchronous supervision mechanism of procuratorial organs and utilizing social power to construct legal supervision mechanism of temporary execution outside prison in our country. The thesis is divided into four chapters: the first chapter discusses the concept and value of temporary execution and legal supervision. At first, it demonstrates the concept of temporary execution outside prison and the basic characteristics of temporary execution outside prison; then discusses the connotation and extension of legal supervision; finally, analyzes the value of legal supervision outside temporary supervision. The second chapter is about the legislation and practice of the temporary execution of legal supervision in China. First of all, it introduces the enforcement system of temporary imprisonment outside prison since the founding of the people's Republic of China and the relevant legislative provisions of its legal supervision, and points out the current legal provisions of our country. Especially the improvement of the newly revised Criminal procedure Law and the defects and loopholes that still exist. Secondly, it analyzes the problems existing in the judicial practice of the legal supervision of temporary execution outside the prison in our country. And analyzes our country temporarily outside the prison execution legal supervision system insufficient reason. Chapter three expounds the legislative reform and perfection of the legal supervision of temporary execution outside the prison in our country. First of all, starting from the unified approval authority for temporary execution outside prison, then discussing how to improve the approval procedure for temporary execution outside the prison, and finally expounding the revision and improvement of the laws and regulations related to community correction. To ensure timely and comprehensive legal supervision from approval to execution outside the prison. The fourth chapter discusses how to construct the procuratorial supervision mechanism. The emphasis is on how to improve the means of supervision, strengthen the linkage mechanism between relevant institutions and perfect the accountability mechanism, and make proper use of the social supervision power to construct the synchronous supervision mechanism for the temporary execution outside the prison in our country.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.8;D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王公义;;《刑事诉讼法》再修改中关于刑罚执行制度的若干问题[J];中国司法;2011年03期
2 陆志龙;;法律制度的设置应遵循法律的基本原则——浅谈我国的暂予监外执行制度[J];法制与经济(中旬);2011年11期
3 贾丽丽;;论我国“暂予监外执行制度”的不足及完善[J];广州市公安管理干部学院学报;2009年04期
4 关宁;;刑罚变更执行同步监督机制研究[J];法治论坛;2011年02期
5 闵亚莉;苏云姝;;论暂予监外执行检察监督机制之完善[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年02期
6 董晓瑜;蒋珉;;浅议加强暂予监外执行的检察监督[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年12期
7 施虹;;试论暂予监外执行检察监督存在的问题及机制的完善[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2011年10期
8 廖会文;萧敏健;;监外执行中存在的问题及对策[J];法制与社会;2009年30期
9 曾国建;陈曙光;蒋国方;段玉娇;;减刑、假释、暂予监外执行同步监督机制研究[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2010年02期
10 杨军;侯启舞;吴畅;;浅议我国暂予监外执行制度存在的若干问题[J];警官文苑;2011年03期
,本文编号:2028155
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2028155.html