安全,还是秩序——治安理论与实践之上位概念分析及选择
发布时间：2018-07-22 20:45
【摘要】：治安理论与实践的上位概念或核心范畴———能够规定、衍生治安学基本概念的范畴———是国家关于治安价值、政策、制度、策略、工具选择的理论逻辑起点。治安学理论研究状况凸显了我国治安学界在"理论治安学"构建方面存在的最需要关注的缺陷———治安学思想始终缺乏一个强有力的上位的核心概念。安全是主体对客观的安全状态的反映。治安学论域的安全不是一种实体,而是一种社会关系,一种人与人、人与社会、人与自然以及社会与自然的非危险关系———社会安全关系,其典型结构形态是"社区安全复合体"。治安秩序是由国家安全政策、治安行政和刑事法律、法规所确定和协调的以社会、社区安全关系为核心的社会关系的外显形态。安全是秩序的实质内容,秩序是安全的规则形式,安全与秩序具有共在性。安全关系是治安领域固有的唯一的自变量,是划分治安秩序边界的根本依据。社会共同体及其主体间的安全关系行动有"圈地自守型"、"攻城略地型"、"分工协作型"和"和谐发展型"四种基本类型,分别决定着各个层次不同的治安秩序运行形式。
[Abstract]:The upper concept or the core category of the theory and practice of public security-which can stipulate and derive the basic concept of public security-is the logical starting point of the state's theory of public security value, policy, system, strategy and tool choice. The research situation of the theory of public security has highlighted the defects in the construction of "theory of public order" in the field of public security in our country, that is, the lack of a strong upper core concept in the theory of public security. Safety is the reflection of the subject to the objective security state. Security in the realm of public security is not an entity, but a social relationship, a non-dangerous relationship between man and man, between man and society, between man and nature, and between society and nature. Its typical structural form is "community safety complex". Public order is an explicit form of social relations which is defined and coordinated by national security policies, public security administration and criminal laws and regulations, with social and community security relations as the core. Security is the essential content of order and order is the rule form of security. Security relationship is the only independent variable inherent in the field of public security and the fundamental basis for dividing the boundary of public order. There are four basic types of security relations between the social community and its subjects: "self-defense", "attacking the cities slightly", "division of labor and cooperation" and "harmonious development", which respectively determine the different operation forms of public order at different levels.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学;
【分类号】：D631.4
[Abstract]:The upper concept or the core category of the theory and practice of public security-which can stipulate and derive the basic concept of public security-is the logical starting point of the state's theory of public security value, policy, system, strategy and tool choice. The research situation of the theory of public security has highlighted the defects in the construction of "theory of public order" in the field of public security in our country, that is, the lack of a strong upper core concept in the theory of public security. Safety is the reflection of the subject to the objective security state. Security in the realm of public security is not an entity, but a social relationship, a non-dangerous relationship between man and man, between man and society, between man and nature, and between society and nature. Its typical structural form is "community safety complex". Public order is an explicit form of social relations which is defined and coordinated by national security policies, public security administration and criminal laws and regulations, with social and community security relations as the core. Security is the essential content of order and order is the rule form of security. Security relationship is the only independent variable inherent in the field of public security and the fundamental basis for dividing the boundary of public order. There are four basic types of security relations between the social community and its subjects: "self-defense", "attacking the cities slightly", "division of labor and cooperation" and "harmonious development", which respectively determine the different operation forms of public order at different levels.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学;
【分类号】：D631.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 宫志刚;;治安秩序结构研究[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2005年06期
2 邹吉忠;论现代社会的秩序问题[J];河北学刊;2002年01期
3 王均平;;治安学基本范畴的思考与确认[J];湖北警官学院学报;2003年04期
4 郑晓东,蔡晓洪;法律不确定性引出的冲突与补救[J];河北法学;2001年04期
5 高峻;哥本哈根学派复合安全理论的修正和演进[J];教学与研究;2005年10期
6 汪育俊;“国家安全”及其相关哲学概念[J];江南社会学院学报;2001年03期
7 刘跃进;“安全”及其相关概念[J];江南社会学院学报;2000年03期
8 朱宁;安全与非安全化——哥本哈根学派安全研究[J];世界经济与政治;2003年10期
9 杨雪冬;论作为公共品的秩序[J];中国人民大学学报;2005年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张缨;中国转型期企业间经济活动“低信任”违约现象的社会学解释[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年03期
2 方青;农村社会保障的国家责任[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年02期
3 张，
本文编号：2138521
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2138521.html
