论民事诉讼中鉴定结论的运用

发布时间：2018-08-29 11:58

【摘要】：本课题研究民事诉讼制度背景下的鉴定结论相关问题，对鉴定结论的采信必然要遵循民事诉讼的基本规律和民事证据制度的基本理论。本课题的研究目标主要有鉴定结论的概念和基本原理,鉴定结论的功能,鉴定结论的构成要件及证据能力,鉴定结论作为司法证据的历史沿革,司法鉴定的性质,司法鉴定体制的现状及对鉴定结论运用的影响,鉴定结论在民事审判实践中运用的概况等基本问题,以鉴定结论的证据属性和证据效力为切入点,把握民事诉讼中涉及司法鉴定结论启动生成和审查认定的主要矛盾和问题,探寻司法审判公正与效率的路径。在此基础上对司法鉴定结论的生成,鉴定体制和机制的构建和完善,包括进一步完善司法鉴定管理体制、为鉴定结论的有效生成提供体制性保障,进一步规范司法鉴定的启动程序、使鉴定结论的运用必要且合理,完善统一对外委托的流程管理机制、保障鉴定委托工作公正高效,完善鉴定实施中的监督机制、保障鉴定结论生成的权威性；鉴定结论审查认证程序的规则构建,包括鉴定结论的质证标准和规则,专家辅助人制度的构建,鉴定结论的认证模式,鉴定结论的认证规则,鉴定结论认证的证明力采信规则等提出完善模式。
[Abstract]:This paper studies the related problems of the appraisal conclusion under the background of the civil litigation system. The adoption of the appraisal conclusion must follow the basic law of the civil action and the basic theory of the civil evidence system. The research goal of this subject mainly includes the concept and basic principle of the appraisal conclusion, the function of the appraisal conclusion, the composing elements and the evidence ability of the appraisal conclusion, the historical evolution of the appraisal conclusion as the judicial evidence, the nature of the judicial appraisal. The present situation of the judicial expertise system and its influence on the application of the appraisal conclusion, the general situation of the application of the appraisal conclusion in the civil trial practice, and so on, take the evidence attribute and the evidence effect of the appraisal conclusion as the breakthrough point. To grasp the main contradictions and problems involved in the initiation and examination of the conclusion of judicial expertise in civil litigation, and to explore the path of judicial justice and efficiency. On this basis, the formation of the conclusion, the construction and improvement of the appraisal system and mechanism, including the further improvement of the management system of the judicial expertise, provide the institutional guarantee for the effective generation of the conclusion. To further standardize the starting procedure of judicial expertise, to make the application of appraisal conclusions necessary and reasonable, to perfect the unified process management mechanism of entrusting to foreign countries, to ensure the fairness and efficiency of the work of accreditation entrustment, and to perfect the supervision mechanism in the implementation of appraisal, To ensure the authoritativeness of the formation of the appraisal conclusion, to establish the rules for examining the authentication procedure, including the standard and rules for cross-examination of the appraisal conclusion, the construction of the expert assistant system, the authentication model for the appraisal conclusion, the authentication rule for the appraisal conclusion, Certification of the identification of the proof of the rules of acceptance of the proposed perfect model.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D918.9

【参考文献】