犯罪工具的认定和处理
[Abstract]:Criminal instrumentalities refer to the property that criminals consciously choose to act or commit crimes. Instruments of crime are different from illegal gains and contraband. Illegal income refers to all the money or things acquired by the defendant as a result of criminal activities. Such as robbery of money or goods, theft and fraud of money, goods and so on; contraband refers to according to the provisions of the state, citizens are not allowed to retain, use of goods. In the cognizance of crime instrument, the foreign related legislation mainly adopts the direct special theory and the promotion theory. The former requires that the use of criminal instrumentalities must have a direct relationship with crime and that the choice of instruments is specifically prepared and used for the purpose of crime; The latter requires that whether or not the property appearing in the course of the crime is a criminal instrument must have sufficient or close connection with the criminal activity. In the field of criminal law of our country, we should insist on the principle of crime, the principle of close connection and the principle of function. With regard to the nature of the confiscation of criminal instruments, there are mainly theories in the criminal law of our country, such as the theory of coercive measures, the theory of penalty, the theory of security measures, the theory of independent criminal entity measures, and so on. The confiscation of criminal instrument is defined as a coercive measure, and the penalty or security measure has theoretical defects, and it is more reasonable to define it as an independent criminal entity punishment measure. Confiscation of criminal instruments should adhere to the principle of proportionality and the protection of the interests of third parties. The former requires that the proportional relationship between the degree of harm of the crime and the value of the instrument should be taken into account when confiscating the criminal instrument, while the latter requires that attention should be paid to the protection of the legitimate interests of the third party in the confiscation of the criminal instrument. The legal provisions on the procedure of confiscation and preservation of criminal instrumentalities in our country are too brief, not only the operation space of judicial organs is too large, but also the specific department of custody of criminal instrumentalities is not clearly defined. In view of these two problems, we should not only establish the system of judicial review, but also make clear the specific standards for the seizure, seizure and freezing of criminal instrumentalities, and set up a unified custody center for the property involved in the case. If there are objections to the handling of criminal instrumentalities, a special remedy should be established. Corresponding relief measures should be established for different litigation links such as investigation, prosecution and trial. If the case handling organ makes the mistake of confiscating the criminal instrumentalities and thus brings losses to the parties, it may choose to propose the state compensation in accordance with the provisions of the State compensation Law of the people's Republic of China.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D918.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张阳;郭小峰;;论“犯罪工具”的内涵及其处理模式[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年05期
2 庞相梁;犯罪工具的没收和处理[J];人民司法;1987年11期
3 邹金伟;王勇哲;;论犯罪工具[J];公安大学学报;1989年04期
4 吴涛,金亮新;论犯罪工具[J];江苏公安专科学校学报;1999年05期
5 王飞跃;;犯罪工具没收研究[J];中外法学;2010年04期
6 谢丽珍;叶扬;;论犯罪工具的没收——兼评没收“供犯罪所用的本人财物”规定的不足[J];温州大学学报(社会科学版);2014年04期
7 宁诗敏,周建新;淡淡犯罪工具的证据作用及其认定和处理[J];法治论丛;1993年04期
8 李锡海;;人性的创造性与犯罪[J];青少年犯罪问题;2014年01期
9 谢如程;论刑法中的犯罪方法[J];江苏公安专科学校学报;1997年03期
10 ;声音[J];东西南北;2012年07期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 赵阳;聋哑人为工作被操控成“犯罪工具”[N];法制日报;2013年
2 本报记者 潘从武 本报通讯员 张越;微信寻友被不法分子利用成犯罪工具[N];法制日报;2013年
3 茅亿 茆素青;犯罪工具不应由侦查机关没收[N];法制日报;2006年
4 曾军;犯罪工具一律没收不妥[N];检察日报;2006年
5 许晖;“犯罪工具”不必一律没收[N];民主与法制时报;2007年
6 本报记者 游春亮 本报通讯员 关建勋 戎桂莹;手机社交软件竟成网络色情犯罪工具[N];法制日报;2014年
7 江苏省仪征市人民检察院 程宏;以共有财产作为犯罪工具也应没收[N];检察日报;2009年
8 本报记者 袁定波;“影子银行”缺监管沦为犯罪工具[N];法制日报;2013年
9 茅亿 茆素青;犯罪工具应由法院判决没收[N];检察日报;2005年
10 虞又响;判决书应当载明犯罪工具没收否[N];人民法院报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 赵天阳;论应予没收的犯罪工具[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 贺成;我国犯罪工具没收制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2014年
3 范冰;刑法中特别没收问题研究[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
4 赵田茂;犯罪工具的认定和处理[D];河北大学;2017年
,本文编号:2318699
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2318699.html