论我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的完善
发布时间：2018-11-27 14:00
【摘要】： 在法律日趋于保护人权的今天,慎用死刑是世界大同之趋势,而刑事司法精神病鉴定无疑是对死刑拦截的一种行之有效的方式。作为刑事诉讼程序中的重要一环,司法精神病鉴定理应在诉讼过程中得到重视,然而我国现行的刑事司法精神病鉴定制度却存在诸多问题,亟需完善。本文通过对我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度现状的深入考察,针对我国司法鉴定制度中存在的突出问题,依序讨论司法精神病鉴定的启动程序、鉴定人资格和鉴定结论的质证程序,在比较两大法系司法鉴定制度的基础上,吸收国外立法的有益经验,得出重新构建我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的框架和思路。 本文分引言、三章及结语共五部分: 引言,简要介绍2006年轰动全国的邱兴华案的始末,引出论题。 第一章,共分三节。分别从我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度中的启动制度、鉴定人资格制度和鉴定结论的质证制度三方面着手,对其现状和弊端进行描述评析。 第二章,共分三节。依序对两大法系司法鉴定制度中的启动制度、鉴定人资格制度和鉴定结论的质证制度进行分析、比较。 第三章,共分四节。第一节探讨完善我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的理论依据,后三节依序提出完善我国刑事司法精神病鉴定启动制度、鉴定人资格制度、鉴定结论的质证制度的构想。 结语,对全文进行概括性总结。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, when the law is increasingly protecting human rights, it is the trend of the world to use the death penalty with caution, and criminal judicial psychiatric examination is undoubtedly an effective way to intercept the death penalty. As an important part of criminal procedure, forensic psychiatric identification should be paid attention to in the process of litigation. However, there are many problems in the current criminal judicial psychiatric identification system in China, which needs to be improved urgently. Based on the in-depth investigation of the present situation of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in China, this paper discusses the starting procedure of the forensic psychiatric appraisal system in order to solve the outstanding problems in the forensic appraisal system in our country. On the basis of comparing the judicial identification systems of the two legal systems and absorbing the beneficial experience of foreign legislation, the cross-examination procedure of the qualification of experts and the conclusion of identification is put forward, and the framework and train of thought for reconstructing the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system of our country are obtained. This paper includes five parts: introduction, three chapters and conclusion: introduction, brief introduction of Qiu Xinghua case in 2006, leading to the topic. The first chapter is divided into three sections. This paper analyzes the current situation and disadvantages of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system from three aspects: the priming system, the qualification system and the cross-examination system. The second chapter is divided into three sections. This paper analyzes and compares the priming system, the qualification system of expert and the cross-examination system of the appraisal conclusion in the two legal systems. Chapter three is divided into four sections. The first section discusses the theoretical basis of perfecting the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in our country. The last three sections put forward the conception of perfecting the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal starting system, the qualification system of the appraiser and the cross-examination system of the appraisal conclusion according to the order of the last three sections. Conclusion, the full text of the summary.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D919.3
本文编号：2361037
[Abstract]:Nowadays, when the law is increasingly protecting human rights, it is the trend of the world to use the death penalty with caution, and criminal judicial psychiatric examination is undoubtedly an effective way to intercept the death penalty. As an important part of criminal procedure, forensic psychiatric identification should be paid attention to in the process of litigation. However, there are many problems in the current criminal judicial psychiatric identification system in China, which needs to be improved urgently. Based on the in-depth investigation of the present situation of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in China, this paper discusses the starting procedure of the forensic psychiatric appraisal system in order to solve the outstanding problems in the forensic appraisal system in our country. On the basis of comparing the judicial identification systems of the two legal systems and absorbing the beneficial experience of foreign legislation, the cross-examination procedure of the qualification of experts and the conclusion of identification is put forward, and the framework and train of thought for reconstructing the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system of our country are obtained. This paper includes five parts: introduction, three chapters and conclusion: introduction, brief introduction of Qiu Xinghua case in 2006, leading to the topic. The first chapter is divided into three sections. This paper analyzes the current situation and disadvantages of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system from three aspects: the priming system, the qualification system and the cross-examination system. The second chapter is divided into three sections. This paper analyzes and compares the priming system, the qualification system of expert and the cross-examination system of the appraisal conclusion in the two legal systems. Chapter three is divided into four sections. The first section discusses the theoretical basis of perfecting the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in our country. The last three sections put forward the conception of perfecting the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal starting system, the qualification system of the appraiser and the cross-examination system of the appraisal conclusion according to the order of the last three sections. Conclusion, the full text of the summary.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D919.3
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 梁志英;论我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的完善[D];兰州大学;2011年
2 高玉笛;论刑事司法精神病鉴定启动制度[D];中国政法大学;2010年
3 李国伟;我国刑事司法精神病鉴定结论质证机制研究[D];兰州大学;2012年
4 袁海波;论精神障碍司法鉴定制度的完善[D];上海交通大学;2012年
5 郭艳;刑事司法精神病鉴定制度研究[D];安徽大学;2012年
，本文编号：2361037
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2361037.html
