论我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的完善
发布时间：2018-11-27 14:00
【摘要】：震惊全国的福建南平郑民生“3·23”特大凶杀案已经以郑民生被执行死刑而告结束,但围绕着此案,又一次引发了人们对我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的讨论。人们认为一些轰动全国的有关“精神病”犯罪的重大命案中,精神病鉴定并未成为通例,而是由司法机关“酌情考虑”选择性执行,从中不难看出目前我国精神病司法鉴定制度还存在着诸如启动程序不合理,鉴定人制度不合理,质证制度不完善等一系列的不科学的问题,这将直接导致刑事诉讼中控辩双方权利失衡,影响到程序公正和实体公正,难以保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权利。因此,本文结合郑民生“3·23”特大凶杀案,通过对我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度现状的深入考察,针对我国司法鉴定制度中存在的突出问题,在比较两大法系国家司法鉴定制度的基础上,吸收国外立法的有益经验,提出重新构建我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的框架和思路。
[Abstract]:The "323" murder case in Nanping, Fujian Province, which shocked the whole country, has ended with the execution of the death penalty. But around this case, people have once again aroused the discussion on the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system of our country. It is believed that in some of the major deaths involving "psychotic" crimes that have caused a stir throughout the country, psychiatric identification has not become a general rule, but has been selectively carried out "as appropriate" by the judiciary. It is not difficult to see that there are still a series of unscientific problems in the current system of forensic appraisal of mental illness in our country, such as unreasonable starting procedure, unreasonable system of authenticators, imperfect system of cross-examination and so on. This will directly lead to the imbalance of the rights of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings, which will affect the procedural justice and substantive justice, and it will be difficult to protect the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants. Therefore, this article, combined with Zheng Minsheng's "323" murder case, through the in-depth investigation of the present situation of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in China, aims at the outstanding problems existing in the judicial expertise system of our country. On the basis of comparing the judicial identification systems in the two legal system countries and absorbing the beneficial experience of foreign legislation, this paper puts forward the framework and train of thought for reconstructing the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2361038
[Abstract]:The "323" murder case in Nanping, Fujian Province, which shocked the whole country, has ended with the execution of the death penalty. But around this case, people have once again aroused the discussion on the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system of our country. It is believed that in some of the major deaths involving "psychotic" crimes that have caused a stir throughout the country, psychiatric identification has not become a general rule, but has been selectively carried out "as appropriate" by the judiciary. It is not difficult to see that there are still a series of unscientific problems in the current system of forensic appraisal of mental illness in our country, such as unreasonable starting procedure, unreasonable system of authenticators, imperfect system of cross-examination and so on. This will directly lead to the imbalance of the rights of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings, which will affect the procedural justice and substantive justice, and it will be difficult to protect the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants. Therefore, this article, combined with Zheng Minsheng's "323" murder case, through the in-depth investigation of the present situation of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in China, aims at the outstanding problems existing in the judicial expertise system of our country. On the basis of comparing the judicial identification systems in the two legal system countries and absorbing the beneficial experience of foreign legislation, this paper puts forward the framework and train of thought for reconstructing the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 刘方启,陈起江,赵彩霞;中美司法精神病鉴定现状比较[J];法律与医学杂志;1999年02期
2 林美卿;;论我国司法精神病鉴定制度之完善[J];法制与社会;2007年10期
3 宋丽华;;《劳动合同法》功能分析[J];法制与社会;2007年11期
4 邹豫莨;高野;;完善我国精神病司法鉴定制度的思考[J];法制与社会;2008年22期
5 罗小年;;司法精神病鉴定中无病推论的几个问题[J];临床精神医学杂志;2005年06期
6 黄永宏;;对司法精神病鉴定工作的几点思考[J];临床心身疾病杂志;2008年01期
7 宫万路;论鉴定人制度的完善[J];中国司法鉴定;2001年01期
8 刘小林,刘杰;司法精神病鉴定中不同结论的原因及对策探讨[J];中华精神科杂志;2005年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 实习生 赵天水;[N];南方周末;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杨文菁;刑事司法精神病学鉴定启动制度比较研究[D];北京大学;2008年
2 张妍霞;论我国刑事司法精神病鉴定制度的完善[D];烟台大学;2009年
，本文编号：2361038
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2361038.html
