司法鉴定统一立法要论
发布时间：2018-11-29 12:14
【摘要】：2005年全国人大常委会通过的《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》,旨在消除我国司法鉴定领域长期以来存在的混乱与无序状态,力图建立起统一、规范的司法鉴定管理体制。由于《决定》与现行的诉讼体制、证据规则之间的衔接尚欠紧密,及对鉴定权的配置、鉴定实施程序、各类鉴定的标准等问题均未作出明确的规定,以致在实践中各种鉴定机构仍旧各行其是,未能实现《决定》的目的,因此,尽快制定《司法鉴定法》,建立起一整套科学合理的司法鉴定制度,是当前我国诉讼制度乃至司法制度法治化进程中一项亟待完成的任务。
[Abstract]:The decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, adopted by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress in 2005, aims to eliminate the confusion and disorder in the field of judicial expertise for a long time, and to establish a unified and standardized management system of judicial expertise. Due to the lack of close connection between the rules of evidence and the current litigation system, there are no clear provisions on the allocation of the right to appraisal, the procedure for the implementation of the appraisal, the standards of various types of identification, etc. As a result, in practice, all kinds of expert agencies still go their own way and fail to achieve the purpose of the "decision". Therefore, as soon as possible, the "Forensic expertise Law" has been formulated and a whole set of scientific and reasonable judicial expertise systems have been established. It is an urgent task in the process of legalization of litigation system and judicial system in our country.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D918.9
[Abstract]:The decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, adopted by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress in 2005, aims to eliminate the confusion and disorder in the field of judicial expertise for a long time, and to establish a unified and standardized management system of judicial expertise. Due to the lack of close connection between the rules of evidence and the current litigation system, there are no clear provisions on the allocation of the right to appraisal, the procedure for the implementation of the appraisal, the standards of various types of identification, etc. As a result, in practice, all kinds of expert agencies still go their own way and fail to achieve the purpose of the "decision". Therefore, as soon as possible, the "Forensic expertise Law" has been formulated and a whole set of scientific and reasonable judicial expertise systems have been established. It is an urgent task in the process of legalization of litigation system and judicial system in our country.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D918.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 郭华;;论司法鉴定统一管理的困境症结及破解路向——以全国人大常委会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》为中心[J];中国司法;2007年03期
2 何家弘;;我国司法鉴定制度改革的基本思路[J];人民检察;2007年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申惠文;;驳民法宪法新同位论[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年02期
2 何承斌;;试论人权的刑法保障的若干问题[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
3 郑德新;“法的起源”不等于“法意识的起源”——兼论关于“法的起源”争论的误区[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年01期
4 周方伦;刍议法官独立[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年02期
5 陈克军;;合同债权性质研究[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2008年03期
6 曹晓东;张清;;浅议侦查阶段的司法审查制度[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
7 郭莉;崔强;;乌江流域农业水权的法律保障制度研究[J];安徽农业科学;2010年01期
8 张，
本文编号：2364969
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2364969.html
