认知综合测试法区分与案件不同关系者测试效度的研究

发布时间：2019-06-29 11:46

【摘要】：认知综合测试法通过对犯罪情节测试法的改良,并且结合大量实案测试及实验室研究,有效的改善了准绳问题测试法及犯罪情节测试法区分案件角色效度低的情况。经大量实案测试证明认知综合测试法能够有效的区分案件角色,并得到了实验室研究的验证。但以往的实验研究都在模拟盗窃的范式下进行,缺乏其它实验范式的验证。为了证明认知综合测试法同样可广泛应用于其他各类案件,尤其对于案情复杂、取证困难、隐蔽性较强的职务犯罪案件的调查审理仍然具有显著效果,因此,本研究拟在重复前人研究的基础上,进一步在模拟行受贿案件的条件下,考察认知综合测试法区分与案件不同关系者的效度。实验一以年龄在18-24岁之间的大学生为被试,在模拟盗窃案件的情境中研究了认知综合测试法区分作案者、知情者和无辜者三种与案件不同关系者的测试效度。对作案组被试、知情组被试、无辜组被试的综合评判结果进行了统计分析。结果表明:认知综合测试法能够有效的区分作案组被试、知情组被试和无辜组被试。在实验室情景下,其测试的准确率均达到75%以上,与前人的研究结果基本一致。实验二以年龄在18-25岁之间的大学生为被试,在模拟行受贿案件的情境中研究了认知综合测试法区分作案者、知情者和无辜者三种与案件不同关系者的测试效度。对作案组被试、知情组被试、无辜组被试的综合评判结果进行了统计分析。研究结果表明:认知综合测试法能够有效的区分作案组被试、知情组被试和无辜组被试。在实验室情景下,其测试的准确率均达到80%以上。综上,本研究表明:认知综合测试法在模拟盗窃和模拟行受贿的实验条件下均能有效的区分作案者、知情者和无辜者,并且对于三种案件角色的区分效度在统计学上均无显著差异。因此,认知综合测试法对作案者、知情者和无辜者的测试准确率均能达到很高的判别水平。
[Abstract]:Through the improvement of the crime plot test method, and combined with a large number of actual case tests and laboratory research, the cognitive comprehensive test method effectively improves the low validity of the criterion test method and the crime plot test method in distinguishing the role of the case. A large number of practical tests have proved that the cognitive comprehensive test method can effectively distinguish the roles of the case, and has been verified by laboratory research. However, previous experimental studies have been carried out under the paradigm of simulated theft, and lack of verification of other experimental patterns. In order to prove that the cognitive comprehensive test method can also be widely used in other kinds of cases, especially for the investigation and trial of duty crime cases with complex cases, difficult to obtain evidence and strong concealment, this study intends to investigate the validity of cognitive comprehensive test method in distinguishing people with different relationships with cases on the basis of repeating previous studies and under the condition of simulating bribery cases. In experiment 1, college students aged between 18 and 24 years old were used as subjects to study the validity of cognitive comprehensive test in distinguishing perpetrators, insiders and innocent people from those with different relationships with the case in the context of simulated theft. The comprehensive evaluation results of the subjects in the crime group, the knowledge group and the innocent group were statistically analyzed. The results showed that the cognitive comprehensive test method could effectively distinguish the subjects in the crime group, the knowledge group and the innocent group. In the laboratory scenario, the accuracy of the test is more than 75%, which is basically consistent with the previous research results. In the second experiment, college students aged between 18 and 25 years old were used as subjects to study the validity of cognitive comprehensive test in distinguishing perpetrators, insiders and innocent people from those who had different relationships with the case in the context of simulated bribery cases. The comprehensive evaluation results of the subjects in the crime group, the knowledge group and the innocent group were statistically analyzed. The results show that the cognitive comprehensive test method can effectively distinguish the subjects in the crime group, the knowledge group and the innocent group. In the laboratory scenario, the accuracy of the test is more than 80%. In summary, this study shows that cognitive comprehensive test can effectively distinguish perpetrators, informed people and innocent people under the experimental conditions of simulated theft and simulated bribery, and there is no significant difference in the discriminant validity of the three roles. Therefore, the accuracy of cognitive comprehensive test for perpetrators, insiders and innocent people can reach a high level of discrimination.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D918

【相似文献】