Cookie跟踪中的隐私权保护——美国经验与中国选择

发布时间：2018-01-08 01:10

本文关键词：Cookie跟踪中的隐私权保护——美国经验与中国选择　出处：《求是学刊》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：Cookie跟踪侵犯用户隐私已是不争的事实。以"双击诉讼"(Double Click Inc.Privacy Litig.)为代表的美国经验表明,否认Cookie跟踪隐私权侵权责任的成立,在主观要件、损害后果等裁判理由的背后,是隐私权保护让位于互联网行业发展的侵权法理念与价值选择。在我国《侵权责任法》的立法与司法现状之下,Cookie跟踪隐私权侵权责任的成立亦面临制度困境。但网络隐私安全的情感需求日益强烈、技术进步逐渐抵消互联网商业成本的发展趋势表明,应明确网络服务商对用户隐私的注意义务,在一般过错责任原则的框架下重新解释隐私权侵权责任的构成要件。因应社会发展,隐私权的内涵也由此获得了丰富和扩展。
[Abstract]:It's an indisputable fact that Cookie stalks users' privacy. Double Click Inc.Privacy Litig.). The representative of the United States experience shows. Deny that Cookie tracking the establishment of tort liability for privacy, in the subjective elements, damage consequences and other reasons behind the adjudication. It is the concept and value choice of tort law that the protection of privacy gives way to the development of the Internet industry. Under the legislative and judicial status quo of our country's Tort liability Law. The establishment of Cookie tracking privacy tort liability also faces a system dilemma, but the emotional demand for network privacy security is increasingly strong, and the trend of technology progress gradually offset the Internet commercial costs. It is necessary to clarify the duty of care of network service providers to the privacy of users and reinterpret the constitutive requirements of tort liability for privacy under the framework of the general fault liability principle in order to meet the social development. The connotation of privacy has been enriched and expanded.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923;D971.2;DD913
【正文快照】： ——美国经验与中国选择1截至2013年5月21日,北大法宝共有44个关于隐私权纠纷的案例,但没有一起案例是由于Cookie跟踪软件侵犯隐私权而提出的。任的构成要件,给出我国的制度选择。一、Cookie跟踪侵犯隐私权的否证:美国“双击诉讼”的立场针对Cookie的侵权行为,美国从1996年起

【参考文献】