司法中的社会学解释研究

发布时间：2018-02-06 04:19

本文关键词： 司法社会学解释法律解释　出处：《山东大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 由于传统的概念法学适用和解释法律过于机械,逐渐暴露出其弊端。自由法学派和法社会学派在批判概念法学过于机械、僵化的基础上引入了社会学解释方法。随后社会学解释逐渐为人们所重视并且逐渐成为一种独立的法律解释方法。在司法过程中,社会学解释方法运用得也越来越广泛,因为在实际的案件裁判过程中,社会学解释能够在一定程度上弥补文义解释的不足,尤其是在法律语言词句产生边缘模糊的含义或一些疑难案件出现时,需要借助于社会学解释,才能够实现裁判的公正。因此,法官经常会运用社会学解释方法来解决一些复杂的案件,不仅使当前的案件得到解决,而且同样也会使法律不会僵硬而能适应社会变化。由于社会学解释方法在当今的司法实践中被广泛的运用,因此本文试图对司法过程中的社会学解释进行研究。文章一共分为四个章:第一章主要是介绍了社会学解释方法的概念。首先从社会学解释方法的内涵和外延两个方面进行具体的阐述;其次探讨了社会学解释和民间法的区别和联系;最后分析了社会学解释和其他法律方法之间的关系,进一步明确了社会学解释所具有的特征。第二章主要分析了社会学解释方法的运用条件。首先总体分析了社会学解释方法的运用条件:也就是在适用法律规则时,运用文义解释出现了复数解释结果,需要进行社会后果的预测和社会目的衡量的时候才适用;其次分析了社会学解释方法和法律规则之间的关系,社会学解释要以法律规则为基本前提,特殊情况下可以对法律规则变通适用;最后分析了社会学解释的具体运用领域,主要是从宪法、刑法、民法三个领域进行了具体分析。第三章着重探讨了社会学解释方法的应用步骤:首先是对于每一种解释所产生的社会效果进行预测和分析,其次确定社会统制目的,用社会目的来衡量各种解释所产生的社会效果,看何者解释更符合社会目的;然后本章第二节通过“彭宇案”、“泸州第三者继承案”、“贾国宇案”等一些具体的案例来详细阐述社会学解释的应用条件和步骤。第四章主要对社会学解释进行了评价。主要从社会学解释方法的必要性和局限性进行了评价。首先分析了社会学解释方法的必要性,其次分析了社会学解释方法与“两个效果的统一”之间的关系,两者是一脉相承或者是相通的;最后探讨了社会学解释的局限性以及局限性应当如何解决。总而言之,社会学解释在司法过程中是不可缺少的一种法律解释方法,它有特有的运用条件和运用步骤,也有一定的优势和局限性,在司法中,通常要与其他法律解释结合起来,共同发挥作用,这样才能达到良好的社会效果,实现社会正义和社会福利。
[Abstract]:Because the traditional conceptual jurisprudence is too mechanical to apply and interpret the law, it gradually exposes its disadvantages. The liberal law school and the legal society school criticize the concept law too mechanically. On the basis of fossilization, the sociological interpretation method was introduced, and then the sociological interpretation was gradually attached importance to and became an independent legal interpretation method. In the judicial process, the sociological interpretation method is used more and more widely, because in the actual case adjudication process, the sociological interpretation can make up for the deficiency of the meaning interpretation to a certain extent. Especially when the legal language words have vague meanings or some difficult cases appear, we need to use sociological explanation to realize the justice of the judgment. Judges often use sociological interpretation to solve complex cases, not only to solve the current cases, but also to make the law not rigid and adapt to social changes. Because the sociological interpretation method is widely used in the judicial practice nowadays, Therefore, this paper attempts to study the sociological interpretation in the judicial process. The article is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the concept of the sociological interpretation method. First, it introduces the connotation and extension of the sociological interpretation method. The specific aspects of the elaboration; Secondly, it discusses the differences and relations between sociological interpretation and folk law, and finally analyzes the relationship between sociological interpretation and other legal methods. The second chapter mainly analyzes the application conditions of sociological interpretation methods. Firstly, it analyzes the application conditions of sociological interpretation methods: that is, in the application of legal rules, The result of plural interpretation appears in the use of literal meaning interpretation, which needs to predict the social consequences and measure the social purpose. Secondly, it analyzes the relationship between the sociological interpretation method and the legal rules. The interpretation of sociology should be based on the basic premise of legal rules, which can be adapted to the rules of law under special circumstances. Finally, it analyzes the specific application areas of the interpretation of sociology, mainly from the perspective of constitution, criminal law, The third chapter focuses on the application steps of sociological interpretation methods: first, the social effect of each interpretation is predicted and analyzed, and then the purpose of social control is determined. Social purpose is used to measure the social effect of various interpretations and to see which one is more in line with the social purpose; Then the second section of this chapter elaborates the application conditions and steps of sociological interpretation through some specific cases, such as Peng Yu case, Luzhou third Party succession case, Jia Guoyu case and so on. Chapter 4th mainly reviews the sociological interpretation. This paper mainly evaluates the necessity and limitation of sociological interpretation methods. Firstly, it analyzes the necessity of sociological interpretation methods. Secondly, it analyzes the relationship between sociological interpretation method and "unity of two effects", and discusses the limitation of sociological interpretation and how to solve it. In short, sociological interpretation is an indispensable method of legal interpretation in the judicial process. It has its own application conditions and steps, as well as some advantages and limitations. In order to achieve good social effect, social justice and social welfare can be achieved by combining with other legal interpretations.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D90-052

【引证文献】