中欧行政性限制竞争行为法律规制比较研究
发布时间:2018-04-14 05:09
本文选题:欧盟竞争法 + 行政性限制竞争行为 ; 参考:《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国《反垄断法》明确规定了行政性限制竞争行为是其规制对象,并从种类、认定方式、法律责任等几方面对该种行为做出规定。行政性限制竞争行为不是中国独有的现象,欧盟作为一个准联邦制国家,行政性限制竞争行为是其竞争法中的重要内容。欧盟行政性限制竞争行为制度经过几十年的发展,已日臻完善。在中欧两地区经济文化等各方面密切联系的背景下,对中欧两地区行政性限制竞争行为立法进行比较研究具有现实意义和理论意义。通过介绍欧盟行政性限制竞争行为立法,我们可以对欧盟行政性限制竞争行为制度有一个全面的认识,对完善我国行政性限制竞争行为制度提供借鉴。从指令、条例和《欧盟运行条约》等着手,对欧盟行政性限制竞争行为制度展开分析,欧盟行政性限制竞争行为主要包括三个部分:限制但不禁止成员国实施行政性限制竞争行为;禁止成员国对国有企业或享有特权专有权企业采取违背条约竞争规则措施;监督控制成员国实施的国家援助。在比较分析中欧行政性限制竞争行为制度时,首先对中欧行政性限制竞争行为的概念、认定与豁免标准、执法机构、法律责任、救济途径以及与产业政策的关系进行阐述,然后从概念、认定与豁免标准、执法机构等6个方面比较中欧行政性限制竞争行为异同。两地区行政性限制竞争行为立法的差异主要是由两地区政治制度、经济体制以及立法价值等因素导致的。通过比较分析中欧行政性限制竞争行为立法规制的异同,我们可以对我国规制行政性限制竞争行为的立法提出完善建议,主要包括明确行政性限制竞争行为主体责任、完善抽象行政性限制竞争行为审查机制、构建一个独立权威的反垄断执法机构和建立行政性限制竞争行为立法优先的价值取向。
[Abstract]:The Anti-monopoly Law of our country clearly stipulates that the administrative restriction of competition is the object of its regulation, and makes regulations on this kind of behavior from the aspects of category, way of identification, legal liability and so on.Administrative restrictive competition is not a unique phenomenon in China. As a quasi-federal country, administrative restrictive competition is an important part of EU competition law.After decades of development, the EU administrative restrictive competition behavior system has been improving.Under the background of the close relationship between the economic and cultural aspects of the two regions in China and Europe, it is of practical and theoretical significance to make a comparative study on the legislation of administrative restrictive competition behavior in the two regions of China and Europe.By introducing the EU's administrative restrictive competition behavior legislation, we can have a comprehensive understanding of the EU's administrative restrictive competition behavior system and provide a reference for perfecting our country's administrative restrictive competition behavior system.From the perspective of directives, regulations, and the "EU operational Treaty", and so on, an analysis of the EU's system of administrative restrictive competition conduct is carried out.The administrative restrictive competition behavior of EU mainly includes three parts: restricting but not prohibiting member states from carrying out administrative restrictive competition behavior, prohibiting member States from taking measures against state-owned enterprises or enterprises with privileged exclusive rights to violate the rules of competition under treaties;To supervise and control the implementation of state aid by member states.In the comparative analysis of the administrative restrictive competition behavior system in China and Europe, the concept, identification and exemption standards, law enforcement agencies, legal liability, relief channels and the relationship with industrial policy of the administrative restrictive competition behavior of China and Europe are first expounded.Then it compares the similarities and differences of administrative restrictive competition behavior between China and Europe from six aspects: concept, recognition and exemption standard, law enforcement agencies and so on.The differences in the legislation of administrative restrictive competition behavior between the two regions are mainly caused by the political system, economic system and legislative value of the two regions.By comparing and analyzing the similarities and differences of the legislative regulation of administrative restrictive competition behavior in China and Europe, we can put forward some perfect suggestions on the regulation of administrative restrictive competition behavior in our country, mainly including clarifying the responsibility of the subject of administrative restrictive competition behavior.We should perfect the examination mechanism of abstract administrative restrictive competition behavior, construct an independent and authoritative anti-monopoly enforcement agency and establish the value orientation of the priority of administrative restrictive competition behavior legislation.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.294;D95
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 李小明;;论反垄断法理论体系之构建[J];法学杂志;2008年03期
2 江飞涛;李晓萍;;直接干预市场与限制竞争:中国产业政策的取向与根本缺陷[J];中国工业经济;2010年09期
3 林碧兰;;行政性公司和公用企业的行政垄断主体地位探讨[J];经营管理者;2009年24期
4 孔少飞;;欧盟的国家援助制度及其借鉴[J];欧洲研究;2006年03期
5 吴中南;国家干预与经济自由——兼论弗莱堡学派的理论与政策[J];社会科学;2004年02期
6 戴龙;;日本反垄断法实施中的竞争政策和产业政策[J];环球法律评论;2009年03期
,本文编号:1747830
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1747830.html