唐某集资诈骗案研析

发布时间：2018-05-06 02:17

本文选题：集资诈骗罪 + 犯罪主体　；参考：《中南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：集资诈骗罪的准确认定是司法难题之一。唐某集资诈骗案涉及四个争议的焦点问题：一是犯罪主体的认定问题；二是主要罪名的认定问题；三是“非法占有故意”时间点的认定问题；四是犯罪数额的认定问题。唐某主观上具有非法占有的目的,客观上以公司名义进行非法集资并最终个人占有,成立集资诈骗罪。集资诈骗罪的非法占有目的应产生于行为前或行为中。行为人已支付的本金利息应在诈骗数额的认定中核减。法院已进行民事调解和民事判决的借款数额不应计入犯罪金额。唐某除成立集资诈骗罪外,还成立贷款诈骗罪和故意伤害罪,应以集资诈骗罪、贷款诈骗罪和故意伤害罪予以数罪并罚。
[Abstract]:The accurate identification of the crime of financing fraud is one of the judicial problems. Tangmou financing fraud case involves four controversial issues: first, the identification of the subject of the crime; second, the identification of the main charges; third, the "illegal possession intentional" of the time point of the problem; fourth, the identification of the amount of crime. Tang has the objective of illegal possession objectively in the name of the company to raise funds illegally and ultimately personal possession to establish the crime of fund-raising fraud. The purpose of illegal possession of the crime of fund-raising fraud should arise before or in the act. The principal interest paid by the perpetrator shall be reduced in the determination of the amount of fraud. The amount of money borrowed by the court for civil mediation and judgment shall not be included in the amount of the crime. Besides establishing the crime of raising funds, Tangmou also set up the crime of loan fraud and intentional injury, which should be punished in combination with the crime of financing fraud, the crime of loan fraud and the crime of intentional injury.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5

【参考文献】