英国刑事卷证移送机制与启示

发布时间：2018-05-12 23:12

本文选题：刑事诉讼 + 卷证移送　；参考：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年03期

【摘要】：刑事卷证移送在英国是一个从起诉开始、一直持续到开场陈述前断断续续的过程,辩方在此过程中负有与控方大致相同的向受理案件的刑事法院移送本方特定卷证材料的义务。与大陆法系国家相比,英国的主审法官在正式审判开始前接触卷证材料的机会和范围并无多大差异,但与大陆法系国家不同的是,在一系列环环相扣的预断抑制机制的综合作用下,英国的卷证移送方式并没有给正式审判带来裁判者不中立、控辩不平等、庭审形式化等危害。我国2012年通过的《刑事诉讼法修正案》在恢复全案卷证移送方式的同时规定了若干相关措施,但要真正有效削弱甚至消除全案卷证移送方式"复活"对公正审判的负面影响,尚需进一步建立健全配套运作机制。
[Abstract]:The transfer of criminal document is a intermittent process from the start of prosecution to the beginning of the opening statement in England, in which the defence has the obligation to transfer its specific documentary materials to the criminal court accepting the case. Compared with civil law countries, there is little difference in the access and scope of the presiding judges in the United Kingdom to the documents before the start of a formal trial, but unlike those in the civil law system, Under the combined action of a series of interlocking pre-judgment suppression mechanisms, the transfer of documents in Britain has not brought about any harm to the judge, the inequality of prosecution and defense, the formalization of the trial, and so on. The Amendment to the Criminal procedure Law passed in 2012 provides some relevant measures while restoring the mode of transferring the whole case file card, but it is necessary to effectively weaken or even eliminate the negative impact of the "resurrection" of the whole case file transfer mode on the fair trial. It is necessary to further establish and improve the supporting operation mechanism.
【作者单位】：重庆三峡学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“公正审判视野下的刑事卷证移送及其配套制度研究”(12BFX057) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事卷证移送制度改革研究”(11YJA820068)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D956.1;DD915.3

【参考文献】