学术精神缘何被异化——基于学术权力和学术权利不当行使的法理解析
发布时间:2018-05-16 04:22
本文选题:学术精神 + 异化 ; 参考:《学术界》2012年11期
【摘要】:学术精神是学术研究的灵魂和导向,是学者独立、自由、求真、创新等学术品格的表达。学术精神的彰显既需要学者正当地行使学术权利,包括秉持求真务实的研究态度、恪守学术道德和学术规范、规避学术失范和学术不端等。同时,也有赖于国家或管理者在学术资源、学术政策与法律等外部条件上予以合理设计和有力支撑。外部条件中的权力因素与学术资源有限性的叠加,使得学术权利的行使不仅具有依附性,而且还充满竞争性。由于学术自律和他律的不足和失控,当下的学术研究有了浮躁、功利、失范、不端等学术精神异化的心理和行为表征,并有愈演愈烈之势。从法理的角度解析,管理者学术权力行政化、利益化是学术精神异化的外在趋导因素;学者学术权利功利化、亲权力化是学术精神异化的内在驱动因素。因此,基于学术法治的内在要求,应当对学术权力和学术权利的行使加以规制。
[Abstract]:Academic spirit is the soul and direction of academic research, and the expression of academic character such as independence, freedom, truth and innovation. The manifestation of academic spirit requires scholars to exercise their academic rights properly, including adhering to the attitude of seeking truth and practical research, abiding by academic morality and academic norms, avoiding academic misconduct and academic misconduct, and so on. At the same time, it also depends on the reasonable design and strong support of the country or the administrator in the external conditions such as academic resources, academic policies and laws. The superposition of power factors in external conditions and limited academic resources makes the exercise of academic rights not only dependent but also competitive. Due to the deficiency and uncontrollable of academic self-discipline and heteronomy, the present academic research has been characterized by impetuous, utilitarian, abnormal and improper academic spirit alienation, and has the tendency of becoming more and more intense. From the point of view of legal theory, the author points out that the administration of academic power and interest are the external guiding factors of alienation of academic spirit, while the utilitarianism and pro-power of academic rights are the internal driving factors of alienation of academic spirit. Therefore, based on the inherent requirements of academic rule of law, academic power and the exercise of academic rights should be regulated.
【作者单位】: 安徽农业大学法学系;
【基金】:2010年度教育部人文社科规划基金研究项目“学术不端行为的法律规制研究”(10YJAZH032)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘德华;;学术精神回归的根本路径:学术制度重建[J];湖南师范大学教育科学学报;2009年03期
2 刘金国;;权力腐败的法理透析[J];法学杂志;2012年02期
3 陈金圣;;从蔡元培北大改革看大学学术权力的制度构建——基于组织新制度主义的视角[J];复旦教育论坛;2012年01期
4 冯向东;;大学学术权力的实践逻辑[J];高等教育研究;2010年04期
5 顾海良;;大学“去行政化”必须找到症结所在[J];教育与职业;2010年13期
6 林U,
本文编号:1895436
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1895436.html