“私了”现象的博弈推理分析

发布时间：2018-05-16 09:28

本文选题：“私了” + 利益驱动　；参考：《云南师范大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： “私了”,指发生纠纷的双方为了平息纷争,不经过法定机构和正式的法律程序,通过私下协商,自行了结争议与问题的一种民间和解方式。 “私了”曾引起人们广泛的关注和争论。有相当多的人认为：“私了”现象是人们法制观念淡薄,司法效率低下,法律不完善等所引起的,是一种不合法的行为。笔者认为,人们规避国家制定的司法程序,采用“私了”的方式,并不一定是因为不懂法,而是对“私了”进行博弈推理分析后所作出的一种理性选择和逻辑结论。本文作者试运用博弈推理的相关知识,分析“私了”现象的合理性及其内在的逻辑动因。本文的主要内容有四个部分：第一部分,阐析“私了”现象的所涉理论及其国内外研究现状,总结本文的研究价值与思路。第二部分,论析完全信息条件下“私了”的博弈推理。第三部分,论析不完全信息条件下“私了”的博弈推理。第四部分,阐析博弈推理视野下的“私了”实质及其启示。
[Abstract]:"private", refers to the two parties to a dispute in order to settle the dispute, without legal bodies and formal legal procedures, through private consultation, the settlement of disputes and issues by themselves a folk settlement. "Private" has aroused widespread concern and controversy. Some people think that the phenomenon of "private" is caused by people's weak concept of legal system, low judicial efficiency, imperfect law and so on, which is an illegal act. The author thinks that the way of "private" is not necessarily because people do not understand the law, but because they make a rational choice and logical conclusion after game reasoning analysis of "private". The author tries to use the relevant knowledge of game reasoning to analyze the rationality of the phenomenon of "private" and its internal logical motivation. The main contents of this paper are as follows: In the first part, the author analyzes the theory of "private" phenomenon and its research status at home and abroad, and summarizes the research value and thought of this paper. The second part discusses the game reasoning of "private" under the condition of complete information. The third part discusses the game reasoning of "private" under the condition of incomplete information. In the fourth part, the essence and enlightenment of "private" in the view of game reasoning are analyzed.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D90-05

【参考文献】