当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

美国仲裁协会建筑业ADR介评

发布时间:2018-05-16 17:12

  本文选题:美国仲裁协会 + 建筑业 ; 参考:《厦门大学》2009年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着学者对ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution)概念的引进,调解,仲裁是许多法律学人所熟悉的ADR方式。事实上,ADR是开放的体系,作为世界上领先的ADR机构,美国仲裁协会帮助当事人设计适当的争议避免和解决机制。 本文由引言、正文和后记三部分组成,正文共分三章: 第一章是美国仲裁协会与建筑业ADR的概述,主要论及ADR的基本原理(概念,范围,特征)和影响建筑业ADR的要素和美国仲裁协会的简介。 第二章详细论述了美国仲裁协会建筑业ADR的机制,包括建筑业ADR的基本形式:谈判,合作管理,DRB,调解,事实调查,早期中立评估,微型审理,仲裁。本章同时论述了协会建筑业ADR创新形式的特点。合作管理也可以称为建筑联盟,当事人应在合同中写入其他ADR工具,如DRB,调解和仲裁。DRB的价值在于自己本身就是项目工程的一部分因而它的存在可以影响合同各方的态度。事实调查、早期中立评估、微型审理在中立专家的资格、保密性和责任排除方面有共同的特点。事实调查人与争议的事实结果不能有财务或个人的利益,事实调查人不应在对抗性或司法场所被强制泄露这些记录或为这些记录作证,协会和事实调查人都不对在该调查程序中的行为或疏忽向任何一方当事人负责。本章也对协会建筑业ADR传统形式的实务操作进行了研究。建筑业调解中的策略问题包括时间安排,现场接近,保修金和保证,支付扣减,,保险,检查和确认等等。在美国律师经办的类似建筑业争议案件中,比较了仲裁和诉讼的特点,包括程序的开始,审前动议,初步审理,证据开示,审理和审理前准备等等。 第三章简要论述了美国仲裁协会建筑业ADR对中国的启示和借鉴意义。中国的DRB应建立DRB成员名单,制定DRB程序和指南,标准合同应写明业主、承包商和DRB成员(三方协议)的权利和义务。中国的建筑业仲裁也应采用快速程序和大型、复杂程序。
[Abstract]:With the introduction of the concept of ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution, mediation and arbitration are familiar to many jurists. As a leading ADR institution in the world, the American Arbitration Association helps the parties to design appropriate dispute avoidance and resolution mechanisms. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and postscript. The text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter is an overview of the American Arbitration Association and the ADR of the construction industry. It mainly deals with the basic principles (concepts, scope, characteristics) of the ADR and the elements that affect the ADR of the construction industry, as well as the brief introduction of the American Arbitration Association. The second chapter discusses the mechanism of ADR of American Arbitration Association in detail, including the basic forms of ADR in construction industry: negotiation, cooperative management, mediation, fact investigation, early neutral evaluation, micro-adjudication, arbitration. At the same time, this chapter discusses the characteristics of ADR innovation in construction industry. Cooperative management can also be called construction alliance. The parties should include other ADR tools in the contract, such as ADR, mediation and arbitration. The value of mediation and arbitration is that they are part of the project itself, so its existence can affect the attitude of the parties to the contract. Fact-finding, early neutral assessment, and micro-trials have common characteristics in the qualifications, confidentiality and exclusion of neutral experts. The fact investigator and the disputed fact result cannot have a financial or personal interest, and the fact investigator shall not be compelled to divulge or testify for the records in a confrontational or judicial place, Neither the Association nor the Fact-Finder is liable to any party for acts or omissions in the proceedings. This chapter also carries on the research to the association construction industry ADR traditional practice operation. Strategic issues in mediation in the construction industry include scheduling, site proximity, warranty and warranty, payment of deductions, insurance, inspection and confirmation, etc. In similar construction disputes handled by American lawyers, the characteristics of arbitration and litigation are compared, including the commencement of proceedings, pre-trial motions, preliminary hearings, discovery of evidence, trial and preparation, and so on. Chapter three briefly discusses the enlightenment and reference significance of American Arbitration Association's construction industry ADR to China. China's DRB shall establish a list of DRB members, develop DRB procedures and guidelines, and standard contracts shall specify the rights and obligations of the employer, contractor and DRB members (tripartite agreement). China's construction industry arbitration should also use expedited procedures and large, complex procedures.
【学位授予单位】:厦门大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D971.2;DD916

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 蔡从燕;美国民事司法改革架构中的ADR[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2003年03期

2 陈建业,韩传峰;论ADR在我国建筑业中应用的必要性和建议[J];建筑经济;2005年04期

3 郭玉军,甘勇;美国选择性争议解决方式(ADR)介评[J];中国法学;2000年05期



本文编号:1897718

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1897718.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c7339***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com