论法律形式与法律渊源的界分

发布时间：2018-05-23 11:38

本文选题：法律形式 + 法律渊源　；参考：《北方法学》2013年01期

【摘要】：法律形式与法律渊源的关系比较复杂,但是我国学者一般将之作为等同的概念使用。这种观点导致了某些学术上的混乱,也导致法律形式和法律渊源各自的作用没能够充分发挥。正确界定法律渊源和法律形式,是实现二者区分的逻辑起点。法律形式是法律文本的表现方式;法律渊源是裁判规范的集合体,法官从中发现裁决案件所需要的裁判依据和裁判理由。由此可以得出二者之区分:从实践来看,法律渊源之法是指司法之法,法律形式之法是指立法之法;从内容来看,法律渊源之法是具有一定开放性的规则体系,而法律形式则是具有一定封闭性的规则体系;从路径来看,法律渊源之法是在司法适用过程发现和寻找的,法律形式之法是立法中形成的。司法适用之法完全局限于制定法之时,二者会出现种属统一,但是其概念内涵依然有着重大区别。
[Abstract]:The relationship between the form of law and the origin of law is complicated, but Chinese scholars generally use it as an equivalent concept. This view leads to some academic confusion and the failure to give full play to the respective roles of the forms and sources of law. To define the origin and form of law correctly is the logical starting point to realize the distinction between the two. The form of law is the manifestation of the legal text, and the source of law is the aggregate of the adjudication norms, from which the judge finds the basis and reasons for the adjudication of the case. From the view of practice, the law of legal origin refers to the law of judicature, the law of legal form means the law of legislation, and the law of source of law is a system of rules with certain openness from the content point of view, the law of source of law means the law of judicature, the law of form of law means the law of legislation. The form of law is a closed system of rules; from the path, the law of legal origin is found and sought in the process of judicial application, and the law of form of law is formed in legislation. When the law of judicial application is completely limited to the law of enactment, there will be a unity of species between the two, but there is still a significant difference in its concept and connotation.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所博士后科研工作流动站;湖南行政学院;
【基金】：湖南省社科基金项目“法律修辞学的司法运用研究”(项目编号11ybb365)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】