道德与法律关系的时代建构:道德法律化初探
发布时间:2018-08-29 15:52
【摘要】:在生活日益多元的时代里,随着社会意识的多样化发展,民众对道德及法律的理解也呈多元化的发展态势。一方面社会的容忍度在不断增加,另一方面人们对道德与法律之间关系的理解变得更为复杂,有些人认为道德与法律之间不存在必然的联系,法律不受道德的影响可以独立适用;有些人则认为道德与法律之间虽有联系但矛盾重重,关系错综复杂。面对当前的社会发展现状,本文试图以正确分析道德与法律之间的关系作为理论依据,初步探讨道德法律化在多元社会下可能存在的贡献。目前国内不少学者对道德法律化的看法褒贬不一,我们有必要针对当前我国所处的特殊转型时期,重新明确道德与法律之间的关系,理解道德法律化的含义及意义,发挥它应有的积极作用。本人认为,寻找道德与法律公认的价值,作为社会价值的根基是十分必要的。道德法律化就是在这一共同价值理念基础上实现道德与法律之间的转换,帮助形成社会共识,并以此作为社会的道德根基加以推广和适用。当立法与司法都能体现法律的道德内涵时,公民自觉守法才可能实现。在尊重道德与法律之间关系复杂性基础上,不能全盘否定道德法律化,也不能无视道德法律化的消极面。要实现法治,公民必须具有基本的道德共识及素养。道德法律化的实现目标是为了推动中国更快地实现以法治国。 全文由四部分组成: 第一部分,通过案例分析指出目前转型时期,社会意识多元化对法律造成的影响,说明我们不但需要寻找道德与法律的共识作为价值判断的依据,还要重新认识道德与法律之间的关系,寻找它们之间的平衡点; 第二部分,通过总结国内对道德与法律关系方面的理论研究,批判以凯尔逊为代表的实证主义观点,并阐述自己对两者关系的认识,在此基础上提出要正确、客观、全面地理解和认识道德法律化; 第三部分,对道德法律化进行学理分析,本文是从广义的角度理解道德法律化,分析道德法律化的积极和消极面,,并总结对道德法律化的理解。 第四部分,重申道德法律化的研究意义,说明道德法律化不但能满足公众的道德情感需要,还能增强法律的权威。最后提出道德法律化应如何适用等问题。
[Abstract]:With the development of social consciousness, people's understanding of morality and law is becoming more and more diverse in the era of increasingly diverse life. On the one hand, the tolerance of society is increasing, on the other hand, the understanding of the relationship between morality and law has become more complicated, and some people think that there is no necessary connection between morality and law. The law can be applied independently from the influence of morality; some people think that there is a link between morality and law, but the relationship is complicated. In the face of the present situation of social development, this paper attempts to analyze the relationship between morality and law as the theoretical basis, and preliminarily discuss the possible contribution of moral legalization in the pluralistic society. At present, many domestic scholars have different opinions on moral legalization. It is necessary for us to re-define the relationship between morality and law and understand the meaning and significance of moral legalization in view of the special period of transition in our country. Give play to its due positive role. In my opinion, it is necessary to seek the recognized values of morality and law as the foundation of social values. The legalization of morality is to realize the transformation between morality and law on the basis of this common value concept, to help form the social consensus, and to promote and apply it as the moral foundation of the society. When legislation and judicature can embody the moral connotation of law, citizens can abide by the law consciously. On the basis of the complexity of the relationship between respecting morality and law, the legalization of morality cannot be denied or the negative side of legalization of morality can not be ignored. To achieve the rule of law, citizens must have a basic moral consensus and literacy. The goal of moral legalization is to push China to realize the rule of law more quickly. The paper is composed of four parts: the first part, through the case analysis, points out the influence of the diversification of social consciousness on the law during the current transition period. It shows that we not only need to find a common understanding of morality and law as the basis of value judgment, but also need to re-understand the relationship between morality and law and find the balance between them. Through summing up the theoretical research on the relationship between morality and law in China, criticizing the positivism viewpoint represented by Kelson, and expounding his own understanding of the relationship between the two, on the basis of this, the author puts forward that we should be correct and objective. The third part is the theoretical analysis of moral legalization, this article is to understand moral legalization from a broad perspective, to analyze the positive and negative aspects of moral legalization, the third part is to analyze the positive and negative aspects of moral legalization. And summarizes the understanding of moral legalization. The fourth part restates the research significance of moral legalization, which shows that moral legalization can not only meet the moral emotional needs of the public, but also enhance the authority of the law. Finally, the author puts forward how to apply moral legalization and so on.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D90-052
本文编号:2211676
[Abstract]:With the development of social consciousness, people's understanding of morality and law is becoming more and more diverse in the era of increasingly diverse life. On the one hand, the tolerance of society is increasing, on the other hand, the understanding of the relationship between morality and law has become more complicated, and some people think that there is no necessary connection between morality and law. The law can be applied independently from the influence of morality; some people think that there is a link between morality and law, but the relationship is complicated. In the face of the present situation of social development, this paper attempts to analyze the relationship between morality and law as the theoretical basis, and preliminarily discuss the possible contribution of moral legalization in the pluralistic society. At present, many domestic scholars have different opinions on moral legalization. It is necessary for us to re-define the relationship between morality and law and understand the meaning and significance of moral legalization in view of the special period of transition in our country. Give play to its due positive role. In my opinion, it is necessary to seek the recognized values of morality and law as the foundation of social values. The legalization of morality is to realize the transformation between morality and law on the basis of this common value concept, to help form the social consensus, and to promote and apply it as the moral foundation of the society. When legislation and judicature can embody the moral connotation of law, citizens can abide by the law consciously. On the basis of the complexity of the relationship between respecting morality and law, the legalization of morality cannot be denied or the negative side of legalization of morality can not be ignored. To achieve the rule of law, citizens must have a basic moral consensus and literacy. The goal of moral legalization is to push China to realize the rule of law more quickly. The paper is composed of four parts: the first part, through the case analysis, points out the influence of the diversification of social consciousness on the law during the current transition period. It shows that we not only need to find a common understanding of morality and law as the basis of value judgment, but also need to re-understand the relationship between morality and law and find the balance between them. Through summing up the theoretical research on the relationship between morality and law in China, criticizing the positivism viewpoint represented by Kelson, and expounding his own understanding of the relationship between the two, on the basis of this, the author puts forward that we should be correct and objective. The third part is the theoretical analysis of moral legalization, this article is to understand moral legalization from a broad perspective, to analyze the positive and negative aspects of moral legalization, the third part is to analyze the positive and negative aspects of moral legalization. And summarizes the understanding of moral legalization. The fourth part restates the research significance of moral legalization, which shows that moral legalization can not only meet the moral emotional needs of the public, but also enhance the authority of the law. Finally, the author puts forward how to apply moral legalization and so on.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D90-052
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 严存生;法与道德关系模式的历史反思[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2001年05期
2 赵兴军,时小云;违返公序良俗的民事行为无效[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年03期
3 范进学;论道德法律化与法律道德化[J];法学评论;1998年02期
4 埃克托尔·格罗斯·埃斯比尔,张大川;人权的普遍性与文化多样性[J];国际社会科学杂志(中文版);1999年04期
5 钱奕;;您还敢扶起摔倒的老人吗?[J];观察与思考;2011年10期
6 严存生;法治社会中的“法律上的人”的哲理思考——读拉德布鲁赫《法律上的人》有感[J];华东政法学院学报;2004年06期
7 张洪涛;;论道德法律化的可行性及实施领域界定——社会互构理论的视角[J];理论观察;2006年01期
8 戴茂堂;;论道德法律化之误[J];理论学刊;2007年12期
9 田磊;;父债子还并不天经地义[J];农村工作通讯;2006年05期
10 杨孝如;道德法律化:一个虚假而危险的命题[J];西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期
本文编号:2211676
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2211676.html