对梁某人身损害赔偿案的案例分析

发布时间：2018-09-11 06:03

【摘要】： 注意义务是侵权行为法的重要概念之一,在侵权行为法中居于核心地位。注意义务作为过失的判断标准包括：注意义务的存在标准和注意义务的违反标准两个层面。不动产权人的注意义务是注意义务的一种特殊类型。在确定不动产权人是否要就其控制的物或者环境引起的损害对他人承担侵权责任时,法院往往要考虑受害人在遭受物或者环境损害时的身份是合法进入者还是非法进入者并根据受害人身份的类别分别决定不动产权人是否承担注意义务和注意义务的范围。合法进入者和非法进入者的区分原则平衡了不动产权人的物权利益和受害人享有的人身和财产安全的利益,是法律实现公平正义目标的必然要求,应当为我国侵权法所采用。本论文研究的主要内容包括：第一部分,由“2003年梁凤英诉谭暖辉人身损害赔偿案”案情、案件焦点、争议与分歧意见提出关于不动产权人对进入者的注意义务问题的讨论。第二部分,对注意理论的分析。分析侵权法中注意义务存在的认定、注意义务违反的认定和英美法中对进入者的分类,重点分析注意义务的理性人标准和英美法中对进入者的分类。第三部分,对“2003年梁凤英诉谭暖辉人身损害赔偿案”的判决从法学理论和法律规定两个方面详细进行分析。第四部分,将注意义务引入我国侵权法的构想。本文的研究重点为不动产权人对进入者的注意义务标准的确定。本文将重点论述侵权法中注意义务存在的认定与侵权法中注意义务违反的认定,以及英美法中对进入者的分类对我国司法的指导意义,同时从物权与人身权的角度讨论理性人标准与身份区分原则,对不动产权人对进入者的安全注意义务标准具体化提供可行性建议。
[Abstract]:The duty of care is one of the most important concepts in tort law and plays a central role in tort law. The duty of care as the judgment standard of negligence includes two levels: the existence standard of duty of care and the standard of breach of duty of care. The duty of care of immovable property rights is a special type of duty of care. In determining whether the immovable property owner is liable for tort to others for damage caused by the object or environment under his control, The court often considers whether the victim is a legal entrant or an illegal entrant at the time of the damage to the property or the environment and decides whether the immovable property owner undertakes the duty of care and the scope of the duty of care according to the category of the victim's identity. The principle of distinction between legal entrants and illegal entrants balances the interests of immovable property owners with the interests of the victims of personal and property security. It is an inevitable requirement for the law to achieve the goal of fairness and justice, and should be adopted by our tort law. The main contents of this thesis include: the first part, from Liang Fengying v. Tan Wenhui personal injury compensation case in 2003, the focus of the case, Disputes and differences of opinion put forward a discussion on the duty of care of the immovable property owner to the entrant. The second part is the analysis of attention theory. This paper analyzes the determination of duty of care in tort law, the recognition of breach of duty of care and the classification of entrants in Anglo-American law, focusing on the standard of rational person for duty of care and the classification of entrants in Anglo-American law. In the third part, the judgment of Liang Fengying v. Tan Wenhui's personal injury compensation case in 2003 is analyzed in detail from the two aspects of legal theory and legal provisions. The fourth part, introduce the duty of care into the concept of tort law of our country. The emphasis of this paper is the determination of the duty of care of the immovable property owner to the entrant. This paper will focus on the determination of the existence of duty of care in tort law and the determination of breach of duty of care in tort law, as well as the guiding significance of the classification of entrants in Anglo-American law to the administration of justice in our country. At the same time, from the angle of real right and personal right, this paper discusses the criterion of rational person and the principle of distinguishing identity, and provides feasible suggestions for the concretization of the standard of security duty of care of the immovable property right to the entrant.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【相似文献】