社会指标运动中法治评价的演进

发布时间：2018-10-05 20:38

【摘要】：法治评价的演进与社会指标运动的四个阶段紧密相连,呈现出主观性和知识多元性不断增强的趋势。理论阶段,法治评价借鉴社会指标理论研究成果,被部分地涵盖在社会指标中或以政策评估的方式出现;其哲学基础是实证主义和科学主义,实践技术是测量,且几乎没有主观性色彩。初期应用阶段,法治评价理论与社会指标研究难以区分,在评价标准和方法模型运用上,也深受后者的影响;其哲学基础是后实证主义,实践技术是描述,且显现出知识的多元性特征。生活质量指标阶段,两类指标体系都扩展了公民满意度调查的视野;法治评价的哲学基础是解释主义,实践技术是判断,且增加了科学的主观指标。社会指标浪潮复兴阶段,法治评价指标体系逐渐成熟;哲学基础是批判主义,实践技术是回应式评估,且通过交流理论丰富了知识的多元性色彩。中国的法治评价可以分为早期的定性评价与后期的科学评价两个阶段,大体上经过了一个由宏观到微观,从整体评价到区域评价的过程。当前,我国在理论上面临着法治理论和评价指标的问题,在实践中面临资料和数据难以达到研究要求的困境。
[Abstract]:The evolution of the evaluation of rule of law is closely related to the four stages of the social index movement, showing a trend of increasing subjectivity and diversity of knowledge. In the theoretical stage, the evaluation of the rule of law draws lessons from the research results of the social indicators theory, and is partially covered in the social indicators or in the form of policy evaluation, and its philosophical basis is positivism and scientism, and the practical technology is the measurement. And almost no subjective color. In the initial stage of application, it is difficult to distinguish the evaluation theory of rule of law from the study of social indicators, and it is deeply influenced by the application of evaluation standard and method model, whose philosophical foundation is post-positivism, and its practical technology is description. It also shows the diversity of knowledge. In the stage of quality of life index, the two kinds of index system have expanded the vision of citizen satisfaction survey, the philosophical foundation of rule of law evaluation is interpretivism, the practice technology is judgment, and the scientific subjective index has been added. In the stage of the revival of social indicators, the evaluation index system of rule of law gradually matures, the philosophical foundation is critique, the practical technology is the response evaluation, and the diversity of knowledge is enriched by the theory of communication. The evaluation of the rule of law in China can be divided into two stages: the early qualitative evaluation and the later scientific evaluation, which generally go through a process from macro to micro, from overall evaluation to regional evaluation. At present, our country is facing the problem of rule of law theory and evaluation index in theory, and in practice, it is difficult to meet the research requirements of data and data.
【作者单位】：湖南大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省软科学重点项目“法律制度绩效评价理论与技术研究(2009ZK2004)”的中期成果
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】