元杂剧《窦娥冤》之法律视角解读
[Abstract]:In the increasingly diversified academic research today, the boundaries between academic fields become blurred. In the study of the interaction between law and literature, what is useful for practice is that literature always reflects the author's concept of legal system and the judicial system in line with the age of creation to a certain extent. Law and literature, which serve the particularity of literature related to law in general, are in the intersecting zone of literature and law, and belong to a new type of marginal discipline, which is original and pioneering. There is a great space to improve and expand the research level. In-depth study can not only pay attention to the humanity and artistry of literature, but also pay attention to the scientific nature, application and sociality of the legal system. Literature provides people with another external angle of view to interpret the law, so the law also has a known channel of communication. Chinese traditional literature is rich and colorful legal and cultural history research data can be used. This is of great significance to our understanding of ancient Chinese legal culture. The judicial system of our country, although after decades of exploration and practice, has shown its own advantages and strong vitality, but there are also unscientific and unreasonable places. This paper first introduces the rise and development of the cross-cutting field of law and literature, analyzes the legal phenomena in literature, and takes Dou'e 's grievance as an example, and analyzes many legal issues involved in it from the perspective of law, for example, the judge, Finally, the paper discusses the development of modern procedural justice, and analyzes the development and existing problems of modern judicial procedure in our country. This paper attempts to interpret Dou E's tragedy from the legal perspective and explain the relationship between literature and law. It points out that the root of tragedy lies in the "justice" of Dou E's behavior. The conflict with "legal procedure" puts forward some suggestions to promote the construction of contemporary procedural justice.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D909;I207.3-05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王青梅;赵革;;“法律与文学”研究的可行性分析[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2009年03期
2 眉睫;;在法律和文学的边缘[J];博览群书;2008年01期
3 郑红云;;浅议法律与文学的关系[J];当代经济(下半月);2008年06期
4 王祥修;;法律与文学:理与情的交融[J];飞天;2010年16期
5 胡玉鸿;论马克思主义的司法平等观[J];法学;2003年02期
6 颜研生;;浅议文学对法学教育的重要意义[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年04期
7 邱志强;;法律与文学的联袂[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年07期
8 姜志信 ,刘文义;关于《窦娥冤》中的几个问题[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年04期
9 陈若帆;窦娥“节”、“孝”观念摭议[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1985年01期
10 赵晓耕;曲词;;从秦汉司法判例看中国早期传统司法程序制度的意义[J];理论月刊;2009年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 吴忠民;[N];光明日报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 梁健康;论“法律与文学”运动的后现代特征及其理论价值[D];华东政法学院;2003年
2 韩轶春;论《窦娥冤》中法律精神的表现[D];贵州师范大学;2005年
3 吴峤滨;程序正义之再认识[D];厦门大学;2006年
4 郑双;论文学语言与法学语言的语境性特征[D];浙江大学;2009年
5 陈宗峰;《窦娥冤》中的司法模式与司法理念研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
,本文编号:2448007
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2448007.html