法庭会话中的打断现象研究
发布时间：2020-12-07 09:11
庭审是当事人为了实现自己的利益而进行质辩的对抗性言语活动。根据有关法律的规定，法庭庭审分为宣布开庭、法庭调查、法庭辩论、最后陈述和判决五个阶段。其中法庭调查和法庭辩论是庭审不可或缺的阶段，更是实现司法公正，维护当事人权益的核心手段。勿庸置疑，法庭话语研究的中心也集中于对法庭调查和法庭辩论阶段庭审技巧及语言特点的研究。 本文以真实的庭审话语为语料，以会话分析作为理论基础，对庭审中出现频率很高的打断现象进行研究。首先，基于对Sacks,Schegloff和Jefferson提出的话轮转换模式（turn-taking model）及机构话语的回顾和分析，作者将法官在庭审中的作用主要归纳为三方面：（1）分配话轮（Turn allocation），（2）控制话轮长度（Control the turn size），（3）话轮仲裁（Turn mediation）。第二，为了更好的研究法官语言，本文以打断现象为切入点，总结Ferguoson、Murray及Watts等人提出的不同特点 将打断为butting in interruption,overlap,silent interruption,...
【文章来源】：广东外语外贸大学广东省
【文章页数】：73 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
中文摘要
LIST OF FIGURES
TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: TURN-TAKING, OVERLAPPING AND INTERRUPTION
1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
1.4 DATAAND METHODOLOGY
1.4.1 The analyzing tool—conversation analysis （CA）
1.4.2 Research questions of this thesis
1.5 OUTLINE OF THE WHOLE PAPER
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 STUDIES ON CONVERSATION ANALYSIS （CA）
2.2.1 Introduction and historical background
2.2.2 A concise introduction of the turn-taking model
2.3 STUDIES ON INTERRUPTION AND SIMULTANEOUS SPEECH
2.3.1 Differing interruption from overlap
2.3.2 Interruption as face-threatening act （FTA） and the exercise of power
2.3.3 Studies on interruption in courtroom interaction
2.4 STUDIES ON INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE
2.4.1 Using CA study institutional discourse
2.4.2 Institutional Studies on Courtroom Interaction
2.4.3 Studies on asymmetry and power
2.5 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINESE CIVIL PROCEDURES
2.6 MODIFICATION OF TURN-TAKING STRUCTURE IN COURTROOM
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF TURN
3.3 THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PRESENT STUDY
3.3.1 The causes of interruption/overlapping
3.3.2 Description of the theoretical framework
3.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM INTERRUPTIONS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 TRIAL TALK: THE ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.2.1 Judge talk: keeping order in court
4.2.2 Judicial monologue: court instructions and rulings
4.2.3 Judicial Dialogue: objections and asking for clarification
4.3 METHODS TO INTERRUPTION IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.3.1 Butting in interruption
4.3.2 Silent interruption: intervening without overlap
4.3.3 Simple interruption
4.3.4 Overlap
4.4 POWER AND LANGUAGE IN THE COURTROOM
4.4.1 Power relations in the courtroom
4.4.2 Rule-oriented versus relation-oriented accounts
4.5 CAUSES AND PLACES OF INTERRUPTION IN THE COURTROOM
4.5.1 Dissynchronization
4.5.2 Role-conflict
4.5.3 Procedural Limit
4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 ATTEMPTED EXPLANATIONS
5.1 SUMMERY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
5.2 MAJOR FINDINGS
5.3 IMPLICATIONS
5.4 LIMITATIONS
5.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]口语交谈中的话语打断现象[J]. 匡小荣. 修辞学习. 2005(04)
[2]民事庭审程序中的若干问题研究[J]. 相庆梅. 现代法学. 2005(02)
[3]自然会话中的打断现象分析[J]. 李悦娥,申智奇. 当代语言学. 2003(01)
硕士论文
[1]如何在法庭问话中通过话题控制获取所需信息——语篇分析研究[D]. 葛云锋.广东外语外贸大学 2004
[2]法庭交叉询问的邻近应对分析[D]. 韩征瑞.广东外语外贸大学 2004
本文编号：2903003
【文章来源】：广东外语外贸大学广东省
【文章页数】：73 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
中文摘要
LIST OF FIGURES
TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: TURN-TAKING, OVERLAPPING AND INTERRUPTION
1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
1.4 DATAAND METHODOLOGY
1.4.1 The analyzing tool—conversation analysis （CA）
1.4.2 Research questions of this thesis
1.5 OUTLINE OF THE WHOLE PAPER
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 STUDIES ON CONVERSATION ANALYSIS （CA）
2.2.1 Introduction and historical background
2.2.2 A concise introduction of the turn-taking model
2.3 STUDIES ON INTERRUPTION AND SIMULTANEOUS SPEECH
2.3.1 Differing interruption from overlap
2.3.2 Interruption as face-threatening act （FTA） and the exercise of power
2.3.3 Studies on interruption in courtroom interaction
2.4 STUDIES ON INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE
2.4.1 Using CA study institutional discourse
2.4.2 Institutional Studies on Courtroom Interaction
2.4.3 Studies on asymmetry and power
2.5 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINESE CIVIL PROCEDURES
2.6 MODIFICATION OF TURN-TAKING STRUCTURE IN COURTROOM
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF TURN
3.3 THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PRESENT STUDY
3.3.1 The causes of interruption/overlapping
3.3.2 Description of the theoretical framework
3.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM INTERRUPTIONS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 TRIAL TALK: THE ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.2.1 Judge talk: keeping order in court
4.2.2 Judicial monologue: court instructions and rulings
4.2.3 Judicial Dialogue: objections and asking for clarification
4.3 METHODS TO INTERRUPTION IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.3.1 Butting in interruption
4.3.2 Silent interruption: intervening without overlap
4.3.3 Simple interruption
4.3.4 Overlap
4.4 POWER AND LANGUAGE IN THE COURTROOM
4.4.1 Power relations in the courtroom
4.4.2 Rule-oriented versus relation-oriented accounts
4.5 CAUSES AND PLACES OF INTERRUPTION IN THE COURTROOM
4.5.1 Dissynchronization
4.5.2 Role-conflict
4.5.3 Procedural Limit
4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 ATTEMPTED EXPLANATIONS
5.1 SUMMERY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
5.2 MAJOR FINDINGS
5.3 IMPLICATIONS
5.4 LIMITATIONS
5.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]口语交谈中的话语打断现象[J]. 匡小荣. 修辞学习. 2005(04)
[2]民事庭审程序中的若干问题研究[J]. 相庆梅. 现代法学. 2005(02)
[3]自然会话中的打断现象分析[J]. 李悦娥,申智奇. 当代语言学. 2003(01)
硕士论文
[1]如何在法庭问话中通过话题控制获取所需信息——语篇分析研究[D]. 葛云锋.广东外语外贸大学 2004
[2]法庭交叉询问的邻近应对分析[D]. 韩征瑞.广东外语外贸大学 2004
本文编号：2903003
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2903003.html
