论刑事和解制度在检察机关的适用
本文关键词:论刑事和解制度在检察机关的适用 出处:《广东商学院》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:刑事和解制度是当前我国在构建和谐社会及宽严相济刑事司法政策的大背景下,顺应恢复性司法理念的指引,司法机关在法律实务中所进行的有益尝试。检察机关作为适用刑事和解的司法主体,较早地将刑事和解理论及操作模式引入了刑事司法程序的处理当中。我国刑事和解从萌芽到逐步发展,每个阶段都受到了法学理论界和实务部门的广泛关注。对刑事和解制度在检察机关的适用内涵,可概括为刑事案件进入检察阶段时,对于一些特定的刑事犯罪行为,可以由加害人与被害人直接协商,或者在检察机关主持下,加害人以认罪、赔偿损失、道歉等方式与被害人达成谅解,并在此基础上签订和解协议,,检察机关经过对双方的和解协议进行审查确认后,决定不予追究或者建议减轻犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任的一种司法处置模式。在检察机关适用刑事和解,其积极意义在于提高检察机关办案效率,最大限度地保护被害人的合法权益,促使犯罪嫌疑人更好地回归社会,以保障社会长期的稳定性。当前,我国新《刑事诉讼法》已经从法律层面上确定了检察机关适用刑事和解制度的主体地位,刑事和解制度在我国司法界正在如火如荼地推行当中,但是,任何制度在推行中所产生的影响犹如一枚硬币的两面,积极效应与消极反响同时并存,刑事和解制度在检察机关的适用,积极效果是显而易见的,但同样也不可避免地会产生一些矛盾或问题。故而,结合现阶段我国检察机关适用刑事和解过程中所存在的问题,并提出对该环节完善的配套措施,将是本论文研究的重点。 论文内容共划分为四部分:第一部分对刑事和解制度在检察机关适用的基本理论进行概述。主要介绍了刑事和解制度在检察机关适用刑事的理论内涵、基本特点及其价值分析。第二部分分析了刑事和解制度在检察机关适用的现状及存在问题。第三部分通过借鉴国外检察机关在适用刑事和解过程中的相关立法及具体操作经验,以期对我国刑事和解制度在检察机关的适用带来一些启发。第四部分提出了完善刑事和解制度在检察机关适用的相应配套措施建设,以更好地推进刑事和解制度在检察机关的有效适用。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal reconciliation is the guidance of the concept of restorative justice under the background of constructing a harmonious society and combining leniency and strict punishment with criminal justice policy. Judicial organs in the legal practice of the beneficial attempt. Procuratorial organs as the application of criminal reconciliation of the judicial subject. The theory and operation mode of criminal reconciliation were introduced into the criminal justice procedure earlier. The criminal reconciliation in our country developed from the bud to the gradual development. Each stage has been widely concerned by the legal theorists and practical departments. The applicable connotation of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs can be summarized as when the criminal cases enter the procuratorial stage. For some specific criminal acts, the perpetrator and the victim can consult directly, or under the auspices of the procuratorial organ, the perpetrator can reach an understanding with the victim by pleading guilty, compensating for the loss, apologizing and so on. And on this basis signed a settlement agreement, the procuratorial organs after the two sides of the settlement agreement after the examination and confirmation. To decide not to investigate or to suggest a mode of judicial treatment to reduce criminal responsibility of criminal suspects. The positive significance of criminal reconciliation in procuratorial organs lies in improving the efficiency of handling cases by procuratorial organs. To maximize the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of victims, to promote the better return of criminal suspects to society, in order to protect the long-term stability of society. The new Criminal procedure Law of our country has confirmed the subject status of the procuratorial organ applying the criminal reconciliation system from the legal level, and the criminal reconciliation system is being carried out in full swing in the judicial circles of our country, but. Any system in the implementation of the impact is like a coin on both sides, both positive effects and negative repercussions coexist, the criminal reconciliation system in the application of the procuratorial organs, the positive effect is obvious. But it is also inevitable that there will be some contradictions or problems. Therefore, combining with the problems existing in the process of criminal reconciliation applied by the procuratorial organs at the present stage, the author puts forward the necessary measures to improve this link. Will be the focus of this paper. The content of the thesis is divided into four parts: the first part summarizes the basic theory of the criminal reconciliation system applied in the procuratorial organ. It mainly introduces the theoretical connotation of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organ. The second part analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. The third part draws lessons from the relevant legislation of foreign procuratorial organs in the process of applying criminal reconciliation. Specific operational experience. In order to bring some inspiration to the application of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. Part 4th puts forward the corresponding supporting measures to perfect the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. In order to better promote the effective application of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs.
【学位授予单位】:广东商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 史立梅;;刑事和解的程序建构[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
2 李云;;检察刑事和解规范化问题研究[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2010年02期
3 甄贞;陈静;;建设和谐社会与构建刑事和解制度的思考[J];法学杂志;2006年04期
4 罗结珍;;法国刑事诉讼法中的刑事调解与刑事和解[J];法学杂志;2008年03期
5 李洪亮;;检察阶段适用“刑事和解”问题研究[J];法制与经济(下旬);2010年06期
6 李莉航;;新刑诉法背景下检察机关适用刑事和解再研究[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年05期
7 郭晶;;论构建刑事和解制度的诉讼阶段间衔接机制——以探讨检察机关职权定位为线索[J];法制与社会;2009年03期
8 孙丽娟;徐灵菱;;公诉环节实行刑事和解的利弊探析[J];法制与社会;2009年28期
9 王利平;张恺;;审查逮捕阶段进行刑事和解的现实问题及未来展望[J];法制与社会;2012年09期
10 孙绍杰;;检察机关刑事和解机制初探[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2008年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 陈建民;[N];法制日报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 谢彩灵;刑事和解制度中检察机关的角色定位[D];西南财经大学;2011年
2 武新宇;检察视角下的刑事和解制度[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
3 王燕;论检察环节刑事和解的制度化构建[D];山东大学;2011年
4 潘月玲;检察环节刑事和解机制的探索与实践[D];厦门大学;2007年
5 李方旭;构建和谐语境下的刑事和解制度[D];苏州大学;2009年
6 穆柏川;审查起诉阶段刑事和解制度研究[D];郑州大学;2012年
本文编号:1378451
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1378451.html