乡土人民调解员的功能错位与回归——基于安丘、单县的实地调查

发布时间：2018-01-04 19:25

本文关键词：乡土人民调解员的功能错位与回归——基于安丘、单县的实地调查　出处：《学术交流》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新世纪以来,随着城镇化进程和"大调解格局"的提出,人们对乡土人民调解员的功能认知出现了偏差。乡土人民调解员相关法律文本的去政治化以及调解依据的法律化,并没有改变他们参与其中利用自己的政治资本获取更多政治资源的实质,所以乡土人民调解员的社会功能并没有取代其政治功能而占主导,导致这种现象的更深层次的原因包括来自基层的私人诉求和上层的政治诉求。为了顺利推进国家法治化进程,必须从明确乡土人民调解员群体的界限、工作范围和推动"人民调解"的"民间调解"化等方面采取措施,对乡土人民调解员的社会功能进行加强。
[Abstract]:Since the new century, with the urbanization process and "great mediation pattern" proposed. People have deviated from the cognition of the function of the local people mediators. The relevant legal texts of the local people mediators are depoliticized and the basis of mediation is legalized. It does not change the essence of their participation in the use of their own political capital to obtain more political resources, so the social function of the local people mediator has not replaced its political function and dominated. The deeper causes of this phenomenon include private demands from the grass-roots level and political appeals from the upper level. In order to smoothly promote the process of national rule of law, we must clear the boundaries of local people mediators. Measures should be taken to strengthen the social function of local people mediators in terms of the scope of work and the promotion of folk mediation.
【作者单位】：青岛大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“依宪治国的中国道路研究”(14AZD132)
【分类号】：D926
【正文快照】： 正如强世功关于陆思礼《邓小平之后的中国纠纷解决:再谈“毛泽东和调解”》一文的评价那样:作者敏锐地注意到对调解的强调与诉讼之间的关系,调解仅仅是对司法审判功能的一个补充,它履行的是一种解决诉讼纠纷的社会功能。[1]作为调解重要主体的乡土人民调解员,它的社会功能同样

【相似文献】