综合配套改革试验区“先行先试”政策的司法回应

发布时间：2018-01-06 06:14

本文关键词：综合配套改革试验区“先行先试”政策的司法回应　出处：《山西大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：综合配套改革试验区“先行先试”,是指国家批准设立的11个综合配套改革试验区根据改革的新动向、新形势率先进行配套改革试验和立法尝试,并为其他地区提供改革创新的范式。“先行先试”政策的实施能够极大地促进地方经济的发展,并推动中国社会的转型发展。然而,“先行先试”政策在推行的过程中,各主体为获取更多的利益,展开激烈了的争夺,大量的矛盾和纠纷产生,这些问题如果得不到合理有效的解决,将严重制约改革的进程。因此,在立法不完善的情况下,研究司法上如何回应“先行先试”政策,为试验区的改革提供法律层面的救济和保障就显得尤为重要。本文运用文献分析的方法,从“先行先试”的含义、特征等基本问题入手,通过运用实证分析的方法,归纳出司法回应政策在不同的发展阶段应坚持的基本理念和司法回应政策的基本模式,并运用价值分析的方法,分析了司法回应“先行先试”政策的价值和局限性,同时对司法回应“先行先试”进行了理性构建。本文共分为四大部分：第一部分是对相关概念进行解析。该部分首先对“先行先试”一词的由来、含义及特征进行了分析,然后又分别对“司法”以及“司法回应政策”的含义进行了界定。第二部分是对司法回应政策进行实证分析。该部分首先对司法回应政策的理念进行了研究,归纳出司法回应政策应坚持的四个基本理念为分别为贯彻政策理念,协助政策落实理念,全面实施改革政策理念和全力保障发展大局理念；其次对司法回应政策的模式进行了研究,归纳出司法回应政策应坚持的四个基本模式分别为作为准法源适用模式,转化为司法解释模式,转化为司法性文件模式和转化为个案裁判考量因素模式。第三部分是对司法回应“先行先试”政策进行理论分析。该部分首先对司法回应“先行先试”政策的必然性和正当性进行了分析；然后对司法回应“先行先试”政策的价值和局限性进行了分析。第四部分是本文的措施部分,是对司法回应“先行先试”政策进行理性建构。该部分所进行的理性建构主要围绕三方面展开：第一,司法回应“先行先试”政策的基本原则；第二,司法回应“先行先试”政策的程序和标准设置；第三,个案回应“先行先试”政策遵循指导性案例制度。总而言之,本文通过对综合配套改试验区“先行先试”政策的司法回应进行研究,力图为实践中司法回应“先行先试”政策提供一些有意义的建议,从而为“先行先试”的实施提供司法保障和法律上的支持,进而推动综合配套改革的合法、规范与顺利进行。
[Abstract]:According to the new trend of reform, the "first first trial" of the comprehensive supporting reform experimental area refers to the 11 comprehensive supporting reform experimental zones approved by the state, which, according to the new trend of reform, take the lead in carrying out the supporting reform experiments and legislative attempts in the new situation. And for other regions to provide a paradigm for reform and innovation. The implementation of the "first try" policy can greatly promote the development of local economy and promote the transformation and development of Chinese society. In the process of implementation of the "first trial" policy, the main bodies in order to obtain more interests, launched fierce competition, a large number of contradictions and disputes, if these problems can not be solved reasonably and effectively. It will seriously restrict the process of reform. Therefore, in the case of imperfect legislation, how to respond to the "first try" policy in the judicial system is studied. It is particularly important to provide legal relief and guarantee for the reform of the experimental area. This paper uses the method of literature analysis to start with the meaning and characteristics of "first try first". By using the method of empirical analysis, this paper sums up the basic concept of judicial response policy in different stages of development and the basic mode of judicial response policy, and applies the method of value analysis. This paper analyzes the value and limitation of the policy of "first trial" in judicial response. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the analysis of the related concepts. This part first gives the origin of the word "first try". The meaning and characteristics are analyzed. Then it defines the meaning of "judicature" and "judicial response policy" respectively. The second part is the empirical analysis of judicial response policy. This part first studies the concept of judicial response policy. The four basic concepts of judicial response policy are summarized as follows: to carry out the policy idea, to assist the policy implementation idea, to implement the reform policy idea and to ensure the overall development. Secondly, the model of judicial response policy is studied, and the four basic models of judicial response policy should be concluded as the quasi-legal source of application model, transformed into the judicial interpretation model. The third part is the theoretical analysis of judicial response "first try" policy. The first part of the judicial response "first try". The inevitability and legitimacy of the policy are analyzed. Then the author analyzes the value and limitation of the "first trial" policy of judicial response. Part 4th is the measure part of this article. This part mainly focuses on three aspects: first, the basic principle of judicial response "first trial" policy; Second, the procedure and standard setting of the policy of "trial first"; Third, the case response "first first trial" policy follows the guiding case system. In a word, this paper studies the judicial response of the "first first trial" policy in the comprehensive matching reform pilot area. This paper tries to provide some meaningful suggestions for the judicial response to the "first trial" policy in practice, so as to provide judicial protection and legal support for the implementation of "first trial", and then to promote the legitimacy of comprehensive supporting reform. Standardization and smooth progress.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】