案例指导制度下的法律论证--以同案判断的证成为中心

发布时间：2018-01-21 11:57

本文关键词： 案例指导制度法律论证图尔敏图式裁判要点排他性理由　出处：以同案判断的证成为中心　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：参照指导性案例可以被理解为通过适用指导性案例进行规范性命题的证成,这既包括对指导性案例与待决案件相关相似性的逻辑判断,也包括对指导性案例与待决案件决定相似性的实质论证。这一法律论证过程为对指导性案例各构成要素的整体性参照,以裁判要点作为认识起点,以事实比对作为关键环节,以实质理由的确定与权衡作为决定要素。在指导性案例的构成要素中,只有裁判要点具备在判决理由中进行援引的资格,裁判要点之所以可被援引,在于通过案例指导制度所赋予它的权威性进行外部保障,以支持裁判要点的实质理由的说服力作为内在理据。
[Abstract]:Reference to the guiding case can be understood as the proof of normative proposition through the application of the guiding case, which includes the logical judgment of the similarity between the guiding case and the pending case. It also includes the substantive argumentation of the similarity between the guiding case and the pending case. This legal argumentation process is the holistic reference to the elements of the guiding case, taking the main points of the judgment as the starting point of understanding. Taking the fact comparison as the key link and the determination and weighing of the substantive reasons as the determining elements, only the judgment points have the qualification to be invoked in the judgment reasons among the constituent elements of the guiding cases. The reason why the main points of judgment can be invoked lies in the external guarantee through the authority given to it by the system of case guidance, which is based on the persuasiveness of the essential reasons of the main points of the judgment.
【作者单位】：南开大学法学院;南开大学周恩来政府管理学院;
【基金】：2015年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“结果导向的司法决策研究”(15CFX037)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2
【正文快照】： 在案例指导制度的背景下,参照指导性案例已成为承案法官的法律义务,而参照的关键在于作出同案判断,即作出待决案件与指导性案例属于“同类案件”的类似性判断。那么,法官如何进行案件的相似性判断?又如何通过相似性判断进行个案规范的重构?本文将以法律论证理论为分析视角,试

【相似文献】