论传媒监督与司法公正

发布时间：2018-01-23 08:15

本文关键词： 传媒监督司法独立公正冲突　出处：《辽宁大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着科学技术的发展,传媒技术发展越来越成熟,传媒对司法活动的监督表现的愈来愈重要,特别是网络传媒的发展,更加促进了传媒监督功能的发挥。特别是现代社会,司法对于调解社会矛盾和争端发挥着越来越重要的作用,而传媒对司法的监督进一步促进了司法的透明和公正,使司法审判更加的公正和廉明,但是由于传媒发展的不成熟性,在对司法发挥促进作用的同时,也带来了一部分的消极作用,例如2007年许霆案、杭州飙车案、邓玉娇案、彭宇案等等,这些案件无不显示着媒体与司法越来越突出的关系。因此,对于一方面要保障传媒监督对司法活动的积极作用的同时,又要避免其对司法带来的一部分消极影响,这对于传媒与司法关系问题的研究对司法实践和司法理论都有着重要的现实意义。本文以传媒监督与司法公正为题,遵循从一般到特殊,理论联系实践的研究方法,探讨传媒监督与司法公正的关系,以求实现两者的对立统一,寻找两者双赢的结合点。并通过分析传媒监督与司法公正的关系,提出解决传媒监督与司法公正冲突关系的构想,以实现传媒监督与司法公正的协调统一。本文共分为三大部分,其中第一部分概述了传媒监督与司法公正,分为了两点即传媒监督与司法公正的概念、传媒监督与司法公正之间的统一关系,其中重点论述了两者之间的统一关系；第二部分分析了传媒监督与司法公正的冲突,并分为三点即传媒监督与司法公正的冲突表现、传媒监督与司法公正发生冲突的原因、协调两者关系的意义；第三部分主要论述了协调传媒监督与司法公正关系的构想,分为了三点即限制媒体对司法的无限度介入、保障媒体监督权的实现、增强公众的法律意识。现阶段我国正处于社会转型的关键时期,传媒监督与司法公正的关系能否处理得当,关系到我国的社会民主法治建设,使传媒监督能够积极的发挥其应有的功能是我们必须而且急切需要解决的一个问题。通本文这三部分的论述,深入的研究了传媒与司法在互动过程中产生的冲突关系,并通过分析冲突关系,提出了协调两者关系的构想,体现了本文研究的现实意义和理论意义。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the development of media technology is more and more mature, and the supervision of judicial activities is becoming more and more important, especially the development of network media. Especially in modern society, judicature plays a more and more important role in mediating social contradictions and disputes. The supervision of the media to the judiciary further promote the transparency and fairness of the judiciary, so that the judicial trial is more fair and honest, but due to the immature development of the media, it plays a promoting role in the administration of justice at the same time. Also brought part of the negative effects, such as 2007 Xu Ting case, Hangzhou drag racing case, Deng Yujiao case, Peng Yu case, and so on, these cases all show that the media and the judiciary increasingly prominent relationship. On the one hand to protect the positive role of media supervision on judicial activities, but also to avoid its negative impact on the judiciary. This is of great practical significance to the study of the relationship between the media and the judiciary. This paper focuses on media supervision and judicial justice, following from general to special. This paper discusses the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice in order to realize the unity of opposites and seek for a win-win combination of the two, and through the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. In order to realize the coordination and unification of media supervision and judicial justice, this paper is divided into three parts, the first part of which summarizes the media supervision and judicial justice. It is divided into two parts, that is, the concept of media supervision and judicial justice, and the unified relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. The second part analyzes the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, which is divided into three parts: the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, the causes of the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, and the significance of coordinating the relationship between the two. The third part mainly discusses the concept of coordinating the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice, which is divided into three parts, that is, limiting the media's unlimited involvement in the judiciary and ensuring the realization of the media supervision right. At the present stage, our country is in the critical period of social transformation. Whether the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice can be properly handled is related to the construction of social democracy and the rule of law in our country. To enable the media supervision to play its due function is a problem that we must and urgently need to solve. This paper deeply studies the conflict relationship between the media and the judiciary in the process of interaction, and by analyzing the conflict relationship, puts forward the conception of coordinating the relationship between the two, which reflects the practical and theoretical significance of this study.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G206;D926

【共引文献】