海事法院刑事管辖权问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-03 03:44

本文关键词： 依法治海三审合一司法专门化以罚代刑　出处：《大连海事大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：为实现十八大提出的海洋强国战略,依法治海成为关键,而海事司法成为涉海法治建设的重要环节。海事司法主权是国家主权的象征,同时,因其特有的专业性、涉海法律关系的技术性及专门性的特点,对海事司法专门化提出更高要求。因而,应建立将一切涉海民事、刑事、行政案件统归到海事法院管辖的三审合一的海事审判格局。一方面,可以优化司法资源的配置。另一方面,由于目前刑事立法中涉海方面的罪刑法定的空缺,使得很多涉海的刑事犯罪游离于法律之外,海上刑事侵权案件屡见不鲜倒逼我们结束以罚代刑的时代,建立符合海洋强国战略下的中国海事司法职能。海事法院享有刑事审判权可以统一诉讼标准。另外,如若赋予海事法院刑事审判权海事法官在审理民事、行政案件中发现的海事刑事犯罪的线索,可以由其自身提交相关司法部门进行刑事调查,从而填补"以罚代刑"的缺陷,为"海洋强国"战略的实施保驾护航。本文正文包括引言和结论,共四章,主要内容如下:第一章是海事刑事案件管辖权现状及存在问题概述部分。本章从两个部分展开论述。第一部分即阐述海事刑事案件的概念及海事刑事犯罪的受案范围;第二节介绍海事犯罪管辖权的现状以及当前地方法院管辖海事刑事案件的不足。第二章是海事法院行使海事刑事案件管辖权的必要性分析。本章主要从四部分展开论述。第一节增加对涉海案件的刑事管辖权可以更有效的维护海洋权益;第二节赋予海事法院刑事审判权是推进以审判为中心诉讼改革所必须;第三诉讼程序交叉的现状要求海事审判具有刑事案件审判权;第四节海事法院审理海事刑事案件能够保证案件审理质量。第三章是海事法院审理海事刑事案件管辖权的可行性分析。本章主要从两部分展开论述。第一部分阐述海事法院审理海事刑事案件的域内借鉴;第二部分阐述海事法院审理海事刑事案件的域外借鉴。第四章是从现实角度出发,阐述海事法院行使刑事案件后面临的问题以及解决的对策。具体论证了三审合一机制的构建以及各部门之间的协调机制。
[Abstract]:In order to realize the strategy of ocean power put forward in 18, governing the sea according to law has become the key, while maritime justice has become an important link in the construction of maritime legal system. Maritime judicial sovereignty is the symbol of national sovereignty, and at the same time, maritime judicial sovereignty is the symbol of national sovereignty. Due to its special specialty, the technical and specialized characteristics of the legal relationship involving the sea, it puts forward higher requirements for the specialization of maritime justice. Therefore, it is necessary to establish all civil and criminal matters involving the sea. On the one hand, it can optimize the allocation of judicial resources. On the other hand, because of the current criminal legislation related to the sea legal vacancy. Make a lot of criminal crimes involved in the sea free from the law, maritime criminal infringement cases are common to force us to end the era of punishment instead of punishment. The establishment of maritime judicial functions in line with the strategy of maritime power. Maritime courts have criminal jurisdiction can unify the standard of litigation. In addition, if the maritime courts are given criminal jurisdiction in the trial of civil. The clues of maritime criminal crimes found in administrative cases can be submitted to the relevant judicial departments for criminal investigation by themselves, thus filling the defects of "punishment as punishment". The main body of this paper includes introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters. The main contents are as follows:. The first chapter is an overview of the status quo and existing problems of maritime criminal cases. The first part is to elaborate the concept of maritime criminal cases and the scope of maritime criminal offences. The second section introduces the present situation of maritime criminal jurisdiction and the deficiency of local courts' jurisdiction over maritime criminal cases. The second chapter is the necessity analysis of maritime criminal jurisdiction by maritime courts. This chapter mainly consists of four parts. The first section increases the criminal jurisdiction to the sea case can safeguard the maritime rights and interests more effectively; The second section endows the maritime court with the criminal trial power is the must to promote the trial as the center litigation reform; The current situation of the intersection of the third litigation procedure requires the maritime trial to have the criminal case jurisdiction; The third chapter is the feasibility analysis of maritime court's jurisdiction over maritime criminal cases. This chapter is mainly discussed from two parts. The first part illustrates. The maritime court tries the maritime criminal case in the domain to use for reference; The second part describes the maritime court maritime criminal cases outside the reference. Chapter 4th is from a realistic point of view. This paper expounds the problems that the maritime court faces after exercising the criminal case and the countermeasures to solve it, and demonstrates the construction of the mechanism of the unity of the third instance and the coordination mechanism among the various departments.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.23

【相似文献】