司法视角下行政机关自行强制执行程序之探究
本文关键词: 司法视角 行政强制执行 程序 出处:《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:对行政活动的具体过程进行有效控制以达到保障相对人合法权益的最重要手段就是建立并完善行政程序,行政程序具有规制行政自由裁量权滥用、遏制和消除腐败的价值和功能,在现代行政权日益膨胀的背景下有着无可替代的“历史使命”。行政强制执行权赋予行政机关,固然能够提高行政效率,树立行政机关的威信,但极可能引起行政权的肆意妄为。因此在行政机关自力行使行政强制领域必须建立严格的程序对行政强制执行权进行控制和约束。科学合理的程序制度,一方面能保障行政强制活动的顺利进行,提高行政效率,达到行政管理目的;另一方面能保障行政强制执行的合法性,确保行政相对方的合法权益不被侵犯。同时,通过司法审查来进一步规范和完善行政强制执行程序,也是有效防止行政强制权专横和泛滥的有效手段。 本文起始辩析和阐述了行政强制执行的概念、权属与方式,与其他两种易混淆的行政行为进行比较,以纵横向为脉络,确定了行政强制执行的内涵和外延。然后,进一步分析了中外行政强制执行运行模式,从理论研究、法律规范、实践运作三个方面并结合相关案例剖析了我国行政强制执行程序现状,考察了德国、葡萄牙、日本对于行政强制执行程序的规定,以期借他山之石对完善我国行政机关自力行使行政强制执行程序带来些许启迪。在对行政强制执行以及行政机关行使强制执行程序进行客观了解及深入探讨后,提出了现有法律框架下对行政强制执行程序如何进行司法审查这一本文关键问题,揭示了司法审查的不足,评述了救济地位及阶段,亮出了实质性审查的观点,并以2011年6月30日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十一次会议通过的《行政强制法》第四章为参考,对行政强制执行中比较重要的若干程序问题进行了充分陈述。最后围绕意识、制度、操作、监督等四个层面,就如何推进行政强制执行程序建设提出了若干思考和建议。本文的谋篇布局体现了理论与实践相结合的特点,穿叉于其中的案例带有较强的实务性和易通性,在行政机关强制执行程序日益受到关注的今天,是有一定现实指导意见的。
[Abstract]:The most important means to effectively control the specific process of administrative activities in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart is to establish and perfect the administrative procedure, which has the regulation of the abuse of administrative discretion. The value and function of containing and eliminating corruption has an irreplaceable "historical mission" under the background of the increasing expansion of modern administrative power. Administrative enforcement power bestows on administrative organs, which can certainly improve administrative efficiency. Establish the authority of the administrative organs. Therefore, in the field of administrative enforcement, we must establish strict procedures to control and restrain the administrative enforcement power, and scientific and reasonable procedural system. On the one hand, it can ensure the smooth progress of administrative compulsory activities, improve administrative efficiency, and achieve the purpose of administrative management; On the other hand, it can guarantee the legality of administrative enforcement and ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart are not infringed. At the same time, through judicial review to further standardize and improve the administrative enforcement procedures. It is also an effective means to prevent arbitrary and overrun administrative coercive power. At the beginning of this paper, the author analyzes and expounds the concept, ownership and mode of administrative enforcement, and compares it with the other two confusing administrative acts, taking the vertical and horizontal as the context. The connotation and extension of administrative enforcement are determined. Then, the operation mode of administrative enforcement at home and abroad is further analyzed, from the theoretical research, legal norms. Three aspects of practical operation and combined with relevant cases to analyze the current situation of administrative enforcement procedures in China, the investigation of Germany, Portugal, Japan for administrative enforcement procedures of the provisions. In order to take advantage of the stone of other mountains to improve our administrative organs to exercise administrative enforcement procedures on their own bring some inspiration. After the administrative enforcement and the administrative organs to exercise the enforcement procedures of objective understanding and in-depth discussion. This paper puts forward the key issue of how to conduct judicial review of administrative enforcement procedure under the existing legal framework, reveals the shortcomings of judicial review, comments on the relief status and stage, and shows the viewpoint of substantive review. In June 30th 2011, the standing Committee of the 11th National people's Congress passed the 21th session of the "Administrative compulsory Law" 4th as a reference. Some important procedural issues in the administrative enforcement are fully stated. Finally, the four levels of consciousness, system, operation and supervision are discussed. This paper puts forward some thoughts and suggestions on how to promote the construction of administrative compulsory execution procedure. The layout of this paper embodies the characteristics of combining theory with practice. Today, the executive enforcement procedure is paid more and more attention to, and has some practical guidance.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.1;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 季卫东;程序比较论[J];比较法研究;1993年01期
2 王达;;司法强制执行不应“打太极”[J];中国房地产;2011年15期
3 石佑启;论我国行政强制执行的模式选择及其运作[J];河北法学;2001年02期
4 胡海;税收行政强制执行若干问题探析[J];湖南经济管理干部学院学报;2004年03期
5 晏少鹤;;刍议拆除违法建筑中的行政强制执行[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2006年05期
6 刘国森;论行政强制执行的模式选择[J];经济与社会发展;2004年10期
7 周天宁;;浅议税务机关如何运用行政强制执行[J];科技信息;2009年29期
8 马怀德;我国行政强制执行制度及立法构想[J];国家行政学院学报;2000年02期
9 傅华;邢元振;;关于我国非诉行政执行制度的反思[J];天府新论;2009年02期
10 乐永兴;韦嘉燕;;论行政强制执行模式及救济[J];鸡西大学学报;2010年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 李煜;论我国行政强制执行制度[D];苏州大学;2004年
2 廖蓉;税法领域行政强制问题研究[D];四川大学;2004年
3 芦超;论我国行政强制执行制度及其立法完善[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
4 宋莉;论我国的行政强制执行模式选择及完善[D];中国政法大学;2005年
5 许锋;行政机关自力强制执行模式之研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
6 张成胜;行政强制执行之制度完善研究[D];安徽大学;2005年
7 王珈珈;我国行政强制执行模式研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
8 王荣;税收行政强制执行研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
9 王延山;论我国行政强制执行中的私权利保护[D];东北大学;2008年
,本文编号:1492325
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1492325.html