立案调解制度研究

发布时间：2018-02-10 13:02

本文关键词： 纠纷解决调解立案调解　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：调解是随着社会的发展而产生的一种纠纷解决方式,并且随着社会的发展而不断发展。我国的调解制度在经历兴盛、衰退的阶段之后,现在正处于复兴时期。此时的复兴并不是单纯的复兴,而是对我国以前的调解制度去其糟粕、取其精华的一个复兴过程。立案调解制度就是在这个复兴过程中产生的一个重要的制度。现阶段,各地法院纷纷实行立案调解制度,以作为对法院调解制度的改革和完善,取得了很大的成效。但是在实践中由于没有统一的法律规定,立案调解制度在理解和运用过程中产生一些混乱。基于以上情况,本文清楚地界定了立案调解制度的概念,在此基础上论证了我国设立立案调解制度的必要性以及可行性,肯定了立案调解制度是我国司法实践中的一大创新。最后,本文联系我国的实际情况,借鉴国外的一些成功的调解经验,对我国的立案调解制度的设立提出一些建议,以期望立案调解制度在我国实践中成功地发展。本文共分为五个部分:第一部分在对立案调解的概念进行清晰界定的基础上,对立案调解的内涵进行了剖析。分析了立案调解制度产生是法院调解的复兴、弥补现行法院调解机制运作中的缺陷和理论界的推动这三种原因共同作用的结果。同时介绍了我国法院现行的两种立案调解的模式,对两种模式进行比较,分析其优缺点,突显出我国建立立案调解制度需要法院调解、法院委托调解、邀请调解共同合作。第二部分是对立案调解制度在我国实践中的运行状态的考察,肯定了我国立案调解制度运行中的成绩(缓解审判压力、符合和谐社会的要求),指出由于我国没有关于立案调解制度的统一规定,各地法院各行其是,导致立案调解在实践运行中产生很多的不足。第三部分结合我国的实践情况论证了立法上设立立案调解制度的基础;不论是从理论层面还是实践经验来讲,立案调解制度在我国都已经有了孕育其的土壤,再加上司法实践中对其的需要,所以设立立案调解制度势在必行。第四部分是对各国在立案阶段的调解的做法做一个介绍,并对各国与我国的调解制度的不同之处做出分析,以鉴别出哪些经验值得我国借鉴,而哪些做法不适合我国的实际。第五部分是在对我国的现状进行分析之后,借鉴国外的一些成功经验,对我国设立立案调解制度提出一些建议。这一部分是本文的落脚点,重在坚持保障当事人的程序基本权和选择权的基础上,设立立案调解制度,以重新体现当事人合意这个调解的本质。
[Abstract]:Mediation is a kind of dispute resolution method produced with the development of the society, and it develops continuously with the development of the society. After our country's mediation system has experienced the stage of prosperity and decline, We are now in a period of renaissance. The renaissance at this time is not a simple renaissance, but a dregs of the former mediation system of our country. The system of filing mediation is an important system in the process of revival. At the present stage, local courts have adopted the system of filing mediation one after another in order to reform and perfect the mediation system of the court, which has achieved great results. However, in practice, there is no unified legal regulation. Based on the above situation, this paper clearly defines the concept of filing mediation system, and on this basis demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of setting up a record mediation system in China. This paper affirms that the system of filing mediation is a great innovation in the judicial practice of our country. Finally, this article combines the actual situation of our country, draws lessons from some successful mediation experiences of foreign countries, and puts forward some suggestions on the establishment of the mediation system of our country. It is expected that the system of filing mediation will develop successfully in our country's practice. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part, on the basis of clearly defining the concept of the mediation on file, analyzes the connotation of the mediation on file, and analyzes that the emergence of the mediation system on file is the revival of the mediation of the court. This paper makes up for the defects in the operation of the current mediation mechanism of the court and the results of the joint action of the three reasons. At the same time, it introduces the two kinds of mediation modes of the court in our country, compares the two models, and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages. It is obvious that court mediation is needed to establish the mediation system in our country, and the court entrusts mediation and invites mediation to cooperate with each other. The second part is the investigation of the running state of the mediation system in our country, which affirms the achievements in the operation of the mediation system. In line with the requirements of a harmonious society, it is pointed out that due to the absence of a unified regulation on the system of filing mediation in our country, the courts in various places go their own way, which leads to a lot of deficiencies in the practice of filing mediation. The third part demonstrates the foundation of establishing the mediation system in the legislation according to the practice of our country. Whether from the theory level or the practical experience, the mediation system of the case filing has already had the soil to breed in our country. In addition, the needs of judicial practice, so it is imperative to establish a mediation system. The 4th part is an introduction to the mediation practices of countries in the filing stage, and an analysis of the differences between the mediation systems of various countries and China, in order to identify which experiences are worthy of our country's reference, and which practices are not suitable for the reality of our country. The 5th part is to analyze the present situation of our country, draw lessons from some successful experiences of foreign countries, and put forward some suggestions to establish the system of filing mediation in our country. This part is the foothold of this article. On the basis of protecting the basic right of procedure and the right of choice of the parties, the system of filing mediation should be set up so as to reflect the essence of the mediation agreed by the parties.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】