合议庭评议制度的理性反思与制度建构

发布时间：2018-02-16 23:42

本文关键词： 独立审判民主评议合议庭评议功能　出处：《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：合议庭评议功能的发挥程度直接影响案件审判质量与效果,事关人民群众能否切实感受到公平、正义。实践中,虽然人民法院四个五年改革纲要对合议庭独立审判地位予以补强,但是合议庭评议却因遭受诸如"评议对象模糊导致评议内容错漏、评议信息失衡导致评议过程扭曲、评议规则粗糙导致评议效果失实、评议考评失范导致评议权力旁落"等内部民主危机而陷入"形合实独"的运行困境继而造成"评议功能"严重缺位。基于此,矫正合议庭评议制度的价值趋向独立与民主融合,并对民主评议规则予以"厘清合议庭评议事项的范围"、"平衡合议庭成员所掌握决策信息"、"细化合议庭评议具体规则"、"规范合议庭评议案件考评机制"等具体设置应成为复归"评议功能"的理性抉择。
[Abstract]:The degree to which the evaluation function of collegial panel directly affects the quality and effect of the trial of a case, is related to whether the masses of the people can really feel fairness, justice, and practice. Although the four five-year reform outlines of the people's court make up the collegial panel's independent trial status, the collegial panel's deliberations suffer from errors in the content of the evaluation due to, for example, "the ambiguity of the object of comment, and the imbalance of the evaluation information leads to the distortion of the appraisal process." The rough evaluation rules lead to incorrect evaluation effect, which leads to the internal democratic crisis, such as "evaluation power falling" and so on, and thus leads to the serious absence of "appraisal function". The value of the evaluation system of the correction panel tends to be independent and democratic, The rules of democratic evaluation should be "to clarify the scope of the deliberations of the collegiate panel", "to balance the decision-making information held by the members of the collegiate panel", "to refine the specific rules of the collegiate panel's deliberations", "to standardize the appraisal mechanism of the collegiate panel case", and so on. It should be the rational choice of reviewing function.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;重庆市梁平县人民法院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“合作主义视野中城镇基层纠纷解决实证研究”(项目编号:13XFX015)
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】