刑事陪审案件审判程序问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 15:28

本文关键词： 陪审团制度参审制人民陪审员制度程序　出处：《中国青年政治学院》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：陪审制度是普通民众直接参与国家审判权力的表现形式，可分为英美法系的陪审团制度和大陆法系的参审制，我国人民陪审制度在性质上也属于参审制。参审制国家在司法实践中遇到诸多问题，我国也不例外，如何解决这些难题值得关注。每项制度的建立都有一个认识、发展、成熟的过程，，程序作为陪审制度组成部分，是民众实现审判权的工具。本文以对比研究方法、归纳总结方法对陪审的程序问题进行分析，创新之处是以陪审员的特点为中心，为保证陪审员实质性参与案件审判，在各个审判阶段针对陪审员设置相应的程序，尤其对一审陪审案件的上诉结构进行探究。从结构上，本文引言部分对陪审制度的概念及选题做出简要分析。之后的正文共分以下六个部分：第一部分，首先对陪审制度的意义进行分析，认为陪审的功能主要表现为完善僵化的法律、促进审判公正及增进民众对司法的理解，进而提升法院的公信力三个方面。之后，明确本文研究的问题。第二部分，对陪审团制度和参审制模式各自特点进行分析并通过技术设计和功能效果的对比，讨论两大法系适用不同审判模式的原因，从程序角度入手为解决我国人民陪审员制度存在的问题提供思路。第三部分，充分的庭前准备程序为陪审员参与庭审打下良好的基础，对什么条件下适用陪审，被告人是否具有启动陪审的权利，被告人陪审选择权的内容，及陪审员宣誓程序等内容进行研究。第四部分，庭审的好坏直接影响着审判质量，如何使陪审员实质性参与庭审是重要的问题。主要探讨职业法官与陪审员在庭审中的关系，如何根据陪审员事实认知的特点进行庭审程序的安排，如何对案件评议、裁决，怎样协调判决理由与陪审理念冲突等问题，进而做出符合陪审员特点的改变。第五部分，上诉制度具有纠正一审错误、统一法律适用及使被告人服判的价值，但上诉理念与陪审精神存在着冲突，对一审适用陪审的案件是否能提起上诉及上诉之后，二审程序应如何做出相应调整，是本部分研讨的重要内容。第六部分，对全文进行整体总结，程序对保证陪审制度落实起着重要作用，但本文对陪审程序的讨论还不够全面深入，是以后研究的努力方向。
[Abstract]:The jury system is the manifestation of the ordinary people's direct participation in the national trial power. It can be divided into the jury system of the common law system and the civil law system. The people's jury system in our country belongs to the system of trial participation in nature. Countries that participate in the trial system encounter many problems in judicial practice, and our country is no exception. How to solve these problems is worthy of attention. The establishment of each system has an understanding and development. In the mature process, procedure, as part of jury system, is a tool for people to realize judicial power. In this paper, the author analyzes the procedural problems of jury by means of comparative research methods, and the innovation is centered on the characteristics of jurors. In order to ensure the jurors' substantial participation in the trial, the corresponding procedures are set up for jurors at each stage of the trial, especially the appeal structure of the jury cases of first instance. The introduction part of this paper makes a brief analysis of the concept and topic of jury system. The main body is divided into the following six parts:. In the first part, we analyze the significance of jury system, and think that the function of jury is to perfect the rigid law, to promote the justice of trial and to enhance the public's understanding of justice, and then to enhance the credibility of the court. Clarify the problems studied in this paper. In the second part, the author analyzes the characteristics of the jury system and the trial system, and discusses the reasons why the two legal systems apply different trial modes through the comparison of the technical design and the functional effects. From the point of view of procedure, it provides ideas for solving the problems existing in the system of people's assessors in our country. The third part, the full pretrial preparation procedure for jurors to participate in the trial to lay a good foundation, under what conditions applicable jury, whether the defendant has the right to initiate jury, the defendant jury option content, And jury oath procedures and other content to study. In the 4th part, the quality of the trial directly affects the quality of the trial. How to make the jurors participate in the trial is an important issue. This paper mainly discusses the relationship between the professional judges and the jurors in the trial. How to arrange the trial procedure according to the characteristics of jurors' cognition of facts, how to judge the cases, how to decide, how to coordinate the conflict between the reasons of judgment and the jury concept, and then make the changes that accord with the characteristics of jurors. In 5th, the appellate system has the value of correcting the mistakes of the first instance, unifying the application of the law and making the defendant serve the sentence, but there is a conflict between the idea of appeal and the spirit of the jury, and whether or not the case applicable to the jury in the first instance can be appealed or not, and after the appeal, How to adjust the procedure of second instance is an important part of this part. In the 6th part, the whole paper is summarized, the procedure plays an important role in ensuring the implementation of the jury system, but the discussion of the jury procedure in this paper is not comprehensive and deep enough, which is the direction of the future research.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】