检察建议制度若干问题研究
发布时间:2018-02-22 23:06
本文关键词: 检察建议 法律监督 法律效力 出处:《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:检察机关探索检察建议制度已经多年,取得了丰富经验,产生了较好的法律效果与社会效果。但该制度的产生与发展系我国探索的产物,无他国经验可予借鉴。通过对该制度的考察后认为,检察机关应当整合各种规范性文件,提升关于该制度的法律位阶,明确其法律地位,增强其法律权威,应当尽快提上立法工作日程。对其性质的界定,可以将检察建议看做是一种措施,是检察机关实施法律监督权的一种创新方式,这一司法措施应通过完善立法来运行。但要针对不同的建议对象、建议内容,设定强弱不同的法律效力。应制定相关工作实施细则,规范检察建议书制作标准,完善绩效考核、监督落实等相关配套制度,整合检察建议书、检察意见书、纠正违法通知书等相关法律文书。 本文共分为四章,安排如下: 第一章概括阐述了检察建议的概念。从检察建议的概念入手,对检察建议书与检察意见书、纠正违法通知书等其他法律文书进行区别与分析。 第二章是对检察建议制度的现状考察。该部分包括检察建议的法律规定考察、运行现状以及该制度取得的效果。 第三章是对检察建议制度的理论分析。通过检察机关法律监督属性对检察建议的必要性、功能以及运用原则进行了分析。 第四章是对检察建议制度的完善建言。应当通过提高思想认识、提升检察建议的法律地位、完善检察建议的运行程序、强化检察建议的约束力等方式来完善检察建议制度。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial organ has explored the procuratorial suggestion system for many years, has obtained the rich experience, has produced the better legal effect and the social effect, but the emergence and the development of this system is the product of our country's exploration. No other country's experience can be used for reference. After investigating the system, it is considered that procuratorial organs should integrate all kinds of normative documents, upgrade the legal rank of the system, clarify its legal status, and strengthen its legal authority. We should put it on the legislative agenda as soon as possible. In defining its nature, we can regard the procuratorial proposal as a measure and an innovative way for procuratorial organs to implement the power of legal supervision. This judicial measure should be run by perfecting the legislation. However, it should aim at different suggestion object, suggestion content, set different legal effect of strong or weak, should make relevant work implementation rules, standardize the standard of procuratorial proposal making, perfect the performance appraisal. Supervision and implementation of relevant supporting systems, integration of procuratorial proposals, procuratorial opinions, correction of illegal notices and other relevant legal documents. This paper is divided into four chapters, arranged as follows:. The first chapter generalizes the concept of procuratorial suggestion, starting with the concept of procuratorial suggestion, differentiating and analyzing other legal documents, such as procuratorial proposal and procuratorial opinion, correcting illegal notice and so on. The second chapter is a review of the present situation of the procuratorial suggestion system, which includes the inspection of the legal provisions of the procuratorial proposal, the current operation of the system and the effect of the system. The third chapter is the theoretical analysis of the procuratorial suggestion system. The necessity, function and application principle of the procuratorial suggestion are analyzed through the procuratorial organ's legal supervision attribute. Chapter 4th is about the perfection of the procuratorial suggestion system. We should improve the procuratorial suggestion system by improving the ideological understanding, improving the legal status of the procuratorial proposal, perfecting the operating procedure of the procuratorial proposal, and strengthening the binding force of the procuratorial proposal.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张雪妲;李强;;检察建议立法化问题研究[J];中国司法;2010年02期
2 马宏健;试论提高刑事诉讼效率的途径[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年06期
3 陈克方;;对我国检察权定位与检察改革的理性思考[J];法学与实践;2010年01期
4 陈运红;;运用检察建议预防犯罪和参与社会治安综合治理的问题与对策[J];法制与社会;2008年28期
5 王月青;;公检法三机关互相配合之反思[J];法制与社会;2011年11期
6 吴中远;;检察建议权存在的必要性及规范[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年S1期
7 叶建丰;法律监督权:检察权的合理定位[J];河北法学;2004年03期
8 刘利宁;张俊锋;;再审检察建议若干问题的探索[J];检察实践;2005年06期
9 李学林;;检察建议在司法实践中的困境与出路[J];中国检察官;2006年06期
10 梁凤娣;顾文虎;;检察建议基本理论问题研究[J];中国检察官;2009年06期
,本文编号:1525535
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1525535.html